On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:29:30AM GMT, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On 2017/01/24 09:06, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > > Another way to look at it is, "Let me have a look if there's anything
> > > new on faq/current.html - I open the page and, *without* moving
> > > forward, can see straight away if
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 01:13:03PM GMT, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 01/24/17 04:06, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> ...
> > Another way to look at it is, "Let me have a look if there's anything
> > new on faq/current.html - I open the page and, *without* moving
> > forward, can see straight away if something
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:26:21AM GMT, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017/01/24 09:06, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > Another way to look at it is, "Let me have a look if there's anything
> > new on faq/current.html - I open the page and, *without* moving
> > forward, can see straight away if something
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:13:51AM GMT, STeve Andre' wrote:
> On 01/24/17 04:08, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > Another way to look at it is, "Let me have a look if there's anything
> > > new on faq/current.html - I open the page and, *without* moving
> > > forward, can see straight away if something
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:08:07AM GMT, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Another way to look at it is, "Let me have a look if there's anything
> > new on faq/current.html - I open the page and, *without* moving
> > forward, can see straight away if something new has been added. No?
> > Then I move on with
On 01/24/17 04:06, Raf Czlonka wrote:
...
> Another way to look at it is, "Let me have a look if there's anything
> new on faq/current.html - I open the page and, *without* moving
> forward, can see straight away if something new has been added. No?
> Then I move on with my life without scrolling
> On 2017/01/24 09:06, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > Another way to look at it is, "Let me have a look if there's anything
> > new on faq/current.html - I open the page and, *without* moving
> > forward, can see straight away if something new has been added.
>
> Since we've been doing it the other way
On 2017/01/24 09:06, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> Another way to look at it is, "Let me have a look if there's anything
> new on faq/current.html - I open the page and, *without* moving
> forward, can see straight away if something new has been added.
Since we've been doing it the other way for 12 years,
On 01/24/17 04:08, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Another way to look at it is, "Let me have a look if there's anything
new on faq/current.html - I open the page and, *without* moving
forward, can see straight away if something new has been added. No?
Then I move on with my life without scrolling down or
> Another way to look at it is, "Let me have a look if there's anything
> new on faq/current.html - I open the page and, *without* moving
> forward, can see straight away if something new has been added. No?
> Then I move on with my life without scrolling down or doing anything
> else apart from
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:46:52PM GMT, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > As faq/current.html[0] grows, each major change is being added at
> > the very bottom, chronologically. There already are several other
> > pages where this kind of ordering makes sense, i.e. innovations.html[1].
> >
> > Given the
> As faq/current.html[0] grows, each major change is being added at
> the very bottom, chronologically. There already are several other
> pages where this kind of ordering makes sense, i.e. innovations.html[1].
>
> Given the "current" (unintentional pun) nature of changes on the
> aforementioned
12 matches
Mail list logo
