On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:23:24PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Several tools may operate on specific routing tables (or routing domains
> in special cases).
>
> With the exception of `tableid' in ifconfig(8), route(8) and netstat(1),
> all other manuals denote the respective argument as `rtable'
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 02:38:07PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:07:58AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> > On 2018 Apr 11 (Wed) at 23:01:45 +0200 (+0200), Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > :On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:28:03AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> > :> No, all of these uses a
>On 2018/04/13 14:38, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>> I propose to use `rtable' exclusively to ease searching and improve
>> consistency as that's the wording already used across the majority of
>> manuals including rtabe(4) and pf.conf(5) for example.
>
>There's not a lot in it, but tableid is slightly mo
On 2018/04/13 14:38, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> I propose to use `rtable' exclusively to ease searching and improve
> consistency as that's the wording already used across the majority of
> manuals including rtabe(4) and pf.conf(5) for example.
There's not a lot in it, but tableid is slightly more com
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:07:58AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2018 Apr 11 (Wed) at 23:01:45 +0200 (+0200), Klemens Nanni wrote:
> :On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:28:03AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> :> No, all of these uses are correct as-is.
> :`tableid' surely isn't wrong, but using the argume
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:07:58AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> :Or is there any real difference between `tableid' and `rtable' I'm not
> :aware of?
> :
>
> rtables are layer 3.
>
> rdomains are layer 2 (aka, arp and ndp lookups).
The question was not about rtables vs rdomains.
It is about tab
On 2018 Apr 11 (Wed) at 23:01:45 +0200 (+0200), Klemens Nanni wrote:
:On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:28:03AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
:> No, all of these uses are correct as-is.
:`tableid' surely isn't wrong, but using the argument name across manuals
:seems nicer to me.
:
No, they are different th
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:28:03AM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> No, all of these uses are correct as-is.
`tableid' surely isn't wrong, but using the argument name across manuals
seems nicer to me.
Or is there any real difference between `tableid' and `rtable' I'm not
aware of?
No, all of these uses are correct as-is.
On 2018 Apr 10 (Tue) at 23:23:24 +0200 (+0200), Klemens Nanni wrote:
:Several tools may operate on specific routing tables (or routing domains
:in special cases).
:
:With the exception of `tableid' in ifconfig(8), route(8) and netstat(1),
:all other manual
