Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-10 Thread John Long
Fantastic! Will be great for quick jobs without banshee fan wail and roasted
office space in the long summers.

Thank you.

/jl



Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Mark Kettenis
 Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 19:20:09 +0100
 From: Mark Cave-Ayland mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk
 
 Hi all,
 
 Following up from my posts at the beginning of the summer, I'm pleased 
 to announce that as of today, qemu-system-sparc64 built from QEMU git 
 master will successfully install OpenBSD from an .iso and boot back into 
 it in serial mode with its default sun4u emulation:

...

 There are still some issues with the device tree to work out; in 
 particular NVRAM and networking (I'd guess that the OpenBSD sparc64 
 kernel doesn't contain the Realtek device driver so at some point I'll 
 need to create a virtual hme device) but it's good enough to 
 install/boot an OS on different hardware for testing - what could be 
 more fun than that?

Sweet.

The RealTek 8129 should be supported by the rl(4) driver, and is
AFAICT included in the RAMDISK kernel.  Not sure why it doesn't
attach.  If it is easy to hook up QEMU's e1000 hardware emulation to
the emulated sparc64 hardware, that should be supported as well on the
OpenBSD side.

OpenBSD expects the device tree node for the PS/2 keyboard to be named
8042.  That's how it is named on the Ultra AXi boards.

The NVRAM is supposed to be described by a node named eeprom under
ebus.  proper emulation of this device will get rid of the 

  unix-gettod:interpret: exception -13 caught
  interpret h# 01c099fc unix-gettod failed with error ffed
  WARNING: bad date in battery clock -- CHECK AND RESET THE DATE!

spam.

Cheers,

Mark







Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Brad Smith

On 09/09/14 2:20 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:

Hi all,

Following up from my posts at the beginning of the summer, I'm pleased
to announce that as of today, qemu-system-sparc64 built from QEMU git
master will successfully install OpenBSD from an .iso and boot back into
it in serial mode with its default sun4u emulation:


$ ./qemu-system-sparc64 -cdrom install55.iso -boot d -nographic
OpenBIOS for Sparc64
Configuration device id QEMU version 1 machine id 0
kernel cmdline
CPUs: 1 x SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi
UUID: ----
Welcome to OpenBIOS v1.1 built on Aug 26 2014 12:48
   Type 'help' for detailed information
Trying cdrom:f...
Not a bootable ELF image
Not a bootable a.out image

Loading FCode image...
Loaded 4829 bytes
entry point is 0x4000
OpenBSD IEEE 1275 Bootblock 1.3
..
Jumping to entry point 0010 for type 0001...
switching to new context: entry point 0x10 stack 0xffe8aa09
  OpenBSD BOOT 1.6
Trying bsd...
open /pci@1fe,0/pci-ata@5/ide1@2200/cdrom@0:f/etc/random.seed: No such
file or directory
Booting /pci@1fe,0/pci-ata@5/ide1@2200/cdrom@0:f/bsd
3901336@0x100+6248@0x13b8798+3261984@0x180+932320@0x1b1c620
symbols @ 0xffc5a300 119 start=0x100

Unexpected client interface exception: -1
console is /pci@1fe,0/ebus@3/su
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
 The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 1995-2014 OpenBSD. All rights reserved.
http://www.OpenBSD.org

OpenBSD 5.5 (RAMDISK) #153: Tue Mar  4 15:12:10 MST 2014
 dera...@sparc64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/sparc64/compile/RAMDISK
real mem = 134217728 (128MB)
avail mem = 122011648 (116MB)
mainbus0 at root: OpenBiosTeam,OpenBIOS
cpu0 at mainbus0: SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi (rev 9.1) @ 100 MHz
cpu0: physical 256K instruction (64 b/l), 16K data (32 b/l), 256K
external (64 b/l)
psycho0 at mainbus0: SUNW,sabre, impl 0, version 0, ign 7c0
psycho0: bus range 0-2, PCI bus 0
psycho0: dvma map c000-dfff
pci0 at psycho0
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Sun Simba rev 0x11
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
ppb1 at pci0 dev 1 function 1 Sun Simba rev 0x11
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
unknown vendor 0x1234 product 0x (class display subclass VGA, rev
0x00) at pci0 dev 2 function 0 not configured
ebus0 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 Sun PCIO EBus2 rev 0x01
fdthree at ebus0 addr 0- not configured
com0 at ebus0 addr 3f8-3ff ivec 0x2b: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
com0: console
kb_ps2 at ebus0 addr 60-67 not configured
Realtek 8029 rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 4 function 0 not configured
pciide0 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 CMD Technology PCI0646 rev 0x07: DMA,
channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI
pciide0: using ivec 0x7d4 for native-PCI interrupt
pciide0: channel 0 disabled (no drives)
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: QEMU, QEMU DVD-ROM, 2.1. ATAPI 5/cdrom
removable
cd0(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
prtc0 at mainbus0
softraid0 at root
scsibus1 at softraid0: 256 targets
bootpath: /pci@1fe,0/pci-ata@5,0/ide1@2200,0/cdrom@0,0:f
root on rd0a swap on rd0b dump on rd0b
unix-gettod:interpret: exception -13 caught
interpret h# 01c099fc unix-gettod failed with error ffed
WARNING: bad date in battery clock -- CHECK AND RESET THE DATE!
erase ^?, werase ^W, kill ^U, intr ^C, status ^T

Welcome to the OpenBSD/sparc64 5.5 installation program.
(I)nstall, (U)pgrade, (A)utoinstall or (S)hell? I
At any prompt except password prompts you can escape to a shell by
typing '!'. Default answers are shown in []'s and are selected by
pressing RETURN.  You can exit this program at any time by pressing
Control-C, but this can leave your system in an inconsistent state.

Terminal type? [sun]
System hostname? (short form, e.g. 'foo') openbsd

Available network interfaces are: vlan0.
Which network interface do you wish to configure? (or 'done') [vlan0] done
DNS domain name? (e.g. 'bar.com') [my.domain]
DNS nameservers? (IP address list or 'none') [none]

Password for root account? (will not echo)
Password for root account? (again)
Start sshd(8) by default? [yes]
Start ntpd(8) by default? [no]
Do you expect to run the X Window System? [no]
Setup a user? (enter a lower-case loginname, or 'no') [no]

... etc.


There are still some issues with the device tree to work out; in
particular NVRAM and networking (I'd guess that the OpenBSD sparc64
kernel doesn't contain the Realtek device driver so at some point I'll
need to create a virtual hme device) but it's good enough to
install/boot an OS on different hardware for testing - what could be
more fun than that?


The Realtek hardware in that dmesg is an NE2000 PCI adapter which
the sparc64 kernel config indeed does not have a driver for at the
very moment, although it could be added. Having a QEMU driver for
the Happy Meal MAC would provide the best level of compatibility
with other OS's as that is what comes with a lot of Sun 

Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Bryan Steele
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:20:09PM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 Following up from my posts at the beginning of the summer, I'm pleased to
 announce that as of today, qemu-system-sparc64 built from QEMU git master
 will successfully install OpenBSD from an .iso and boot back into it in
 serial mode with its default sun4u emulation:
 
 
 $ ./qemu-system-sparc64 -cdrom install55.iso -boot d -nographic
 OpenBIOS for Sparc64
 Configuration device id QEMU version 1 machine id 0
 kernel cmdline
 CPUs: 1 x SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi
 UUID: ----
 Welcome to OpenBIOS v1.1 built on Aug 26 2014 12:48
   Type 'help' for detailed information
 Trying cdrom:f...
 Not a bootable ELF image
 Not a bootable a.out image
 
 Loading FCode image...
 Loaded 4829 bytes
 entry point is 0x4000
 OpenBSD IEEE 1275 Bootblock 1.3
 ..
 Jumping to entry point 0010 for type 0001...
 switching to new context: entry point 0x10 stack 0xffe8aa09
  OpenBSD BOOT 1.6
 Trying bsd...
 open /pci@1fe,0/pci-ata@5/ide1@2200/cdrom@0:f/etc/random.seed: No such file
 or directory
 Booting /pci@1fe,0/pci-ata@5/ide1@2200/cdrom@0:f/bsd
 3901336@0x100+6248@0x13b8798+3261984@0x180+932320@0x1b1c620
 symbols @ 0xffc5a300 119 start=0x100
 
 Unexpected client interface exception: -1
 console is /pci@1fe,0/ebus@3/su
 Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
 The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
 Copyright (c) 1995-2014 OpenBSD. All rights reserved. http://www.OpenBSD.org
 
 OpenBSD 5.5 (RAMDISK) #153: Tue Mar  4 15:12:10 MST 2014
 dera...@sparc64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/sparc64/compile/RAMDISK
 real mem = 134217728 (128MB)
 avail mem = 122011648 (116MB)
 mainbus0 at root: OpenBiosTeam,OpenBIOS
 cpu0 at mainbus0: SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi (rev 9.1) @ 100 MHz
 cpu0: physical 256K instruction (64 b/l), 16K data (32 b/l), 256K external
 (64 b/l)
 psycho0 at mainbus0: SUNW,sabre, impl 0, version 0, ign 7c0
 psycho0: bus range 0-2, PCI bus 0
 psycho0: dvma map c000-dfff
 pci0 at psycho0
 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Sun Simba rev 0x11
 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
 ppb1 at pci0 dev 1 function 1 Sun Simba rev 0x11
 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
 unknown vendor 0x1234 product 0x (class display subclass VGA, rev 0x00)
 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 not configured
 ebus0 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 Sun PCIO EBus2 rev 0x01
 fdthree at ebus0 addr 0- not configured
 com0 at ebus0 addr 3f8-3ff ivec 0x2b: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
 com0: console
 kb_ps2 at ebus0 addr 60-67 not configured
 Realtek 8029 rev 0x00 at pci0 dev 4 function 0 not configured
 pciide0 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 CMD Technology PCI0646 rev 0x07: DMA,
 channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI
 pciide0: using ivec 0x7d4 for native-PCI interrupt
 pciide0: channel 0 disabled (no drives)
 atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0
 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
 cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: QEMU, QEMU DVD-ROM, 2.1. ATAPI 5/cdrom
 removable
 cd0(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
 prtc0 at mainbus0
 softraid0 at root
 scsibus1 at softraid0: 256 targets
 bootpath: /pci@1fe,0/pci-ata@5,0/ide1@2200,0/cdrom@0,0:f
 root on rd0a swap on rd0b dump on rd0b
 unix-gettod:interpret: exception -13 caught
 interpret h# 01c099fc unix-gettod failed with error ffed
 WARNING: bad date in battery clock -- CHECK AND RESET THE DATE!
 erase ^?, werase ^W, kill ^U, intr ^C, status ^T
 
 Welcome to the OpenBSD/sparc64 5.5 installation program.
 (I)nstall, (U)pgrade, (A)utoinstall or (S)hell? I
 At any prompt except password prompts you can escape to a shell by
 typing '!'. Default answers are shown in []'s and are selected by
 pressing RETURN.  You can exit this program at any time by pressing
 Control-C, but this can leave your system in an inconsistent state.
 
 Terminal type? [sun]
 System hostname? (short form, e.g. 'foo') openbsd
 
 Available network interfaces are: vlan0.
 Which network interface do you wish to configure? (or 'done') [vlan0] done
 DNS domain name? (e.g. 'bar.com') [my.domain]
 DNS nameservers? (IP address list or 'none') [none]
 
 Password for root account? (will not echo)
 Password for root account? (again)
 Start sshd(8) by default? [yes]
 Start ntpd(8) by default? [no]
 Do you expect to run the X Window System? [no]
 Setup a user? (enter a lower-case loginname, or 'no') [no]
 
 ... etc.
 
 
 There are still some issues with the device tree to work out; in particular
 NVRAM and networking (I'd guess that the OpenBSD sparc64 kernel doesn't
 contain the Realtek device driver so at some point I'll need to create a
 virtual hme device) but it's good enough to install/boot an OS on different
 hardware for testing - what could be more fun than that?
 
 
 ATB,
 
 Mark.

Neat! :-)

It seems the GENERIC sparc64 kernel already has PCMCIA/CardBus ne(4), so
adding 'ne* at pci?' might just work.

OpenBSD/sparc64 already supports sun4v LDOMS, so there's 

Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Miod Vallat
 The RealTek 8129 should be supported by the rl(4) driver, and is
 AFAICT included in the RAMDISK kernel.  Not sure why it doesn't
 attach.  If it is easy to hook up QEMU's e1000 hardware emulation to
 the emulated sparc64 hardware, that should be supported as well on the
 OpenBSD side.

Nothing a pcidump -vx dump from qemu wouldn't help diagnosing.



Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland

On 09/09/14 19:54, Mark Kettenis wrote:


Sweet.

The RealTek 8129 should be supported by the rl(4) driver, and is
AFAICT included in the RAMDISK kernel.  Not sure why it doesn't
attach.  If it is easy to hook up QEMU's e1000 hardware emulation to
the emulated sparc64 hardware, that should be supported as well on the
OpenBSD side.

OpenBSD expects the device tree node for the PS/2 keyboard to be named
8042.  That's how it is named on the Ultra AXi boards.


Thanks for the information. I've had some interest from the NetBSD folk 
too and it seems that they don't build 8042 support into their default 
sparc64 kernel, so it looks like I'd have to switch over to su serial 
ports instead like the real thing (the QEMU sun4u model is fairly close 
to an Ultra 5). My aim is to try and provide an environment that mostly 
just works for as many OSs as possible.



The NVRAM is supposed to be described by a node named eeprom under
ebus.  proper emulation of this device will get rid of the

   unix-gettod:interpret: exception -13 caught
   interpret h# 01c099fc unix-gettod failed with error ffed
   WARNING: bad date in battery clock -- CHECK AND RESET THE DATE!

spam.


Brilliant - very useful. The one issue I am aware of is that currently 
the NVRAM chap is wired up as ioport rather than MMIO so that will need 
to change. I believe Artyom posted some patches for this a year or so 
ago, however they will likely need a bit of work to get them suitable 
for upstream QEMU.



ATB,

Mark.



Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland

On 09/09/14 19:57, Brad Smith wrote:


The Realtek hardware in that dmesg is an NE2000 PCI adapter which
the sparc64 kernel config indeed does not have a driver for at the
very moment, although it could be added. Having a QEMU driver for
the Happy Meal MAC would provide the best level of compatibility
with other OS's as that is what comes with a lot of Sun systems.


Agreed. Once I've sorted out the NVRAM issues in theory QEMU should be 
able to run some older 64-bit Solaris 9-10 kernels, and I suspect I'll 
need to implement a virtual hme device in order for that to work. It 
seems like people on this list have quite a bit of SPARC experience, so 
would it be okay to ask questions about hme drivers on this list? Or 
would somewhere else be more appropriate?



But for OpenBSD and sparc64 there are other options that could be
used from QEMU's perspective such as the e1000 [em(4)], i82551 /
i82559er [fxp(4)] and rtl8139 [re(4)] drivers that should work
well.


Interesting. Longer term the aim of the QEMU project is to move the 
hardwired machine types into pluggable devices, e.g. you can build a 
whole machine on the command line from multiple -device parameters or 
preload the default machine types such as sun4u using instructions from 
a file. So while this is not practical now without source hacks, it is 
likely to become possible in the future.



ATB,

Mark.



Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Miod Vallat
 Interesting. Longer term the aim of the QEMU project is to move the
 hardwired machine types into pluggable devices, e.g. you can build a whole
 machine on the command line from multiple -device parameters or preload the
 default machine types such as sun4u using instructions from a file. So while
 this is not practical now without source hacks, it is likely to become
 possible in the future.

Do not expect any support for the fanciest device combinations. While
most sparc64 systems will probably be able to cope with whatever
five-feet sheeps you can build, sparc32 qemu will happily attempt to
emulate systems which make no sense, physically, and dismissing reports
that BSD does not run on such artificial setups is annoying, to say the
least.



Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland

On 09/09/14 20:04, Bryan Steele wrote:


Neat! :-)

It seems the GENERIC sparc64 kernel already has PCMCIA/CardBus ne(4), so
adding 'ne* at pci?' might just work.

OpenBSD/sparc64 already supports sun4v LDOMS, so there's drivers implementing
the virtual protocols (..vnet(4)/vdsk(4)). Does QEMU support this?

Could the PCI virtio stuff be adapted to non-x86 architectures?


QEMU already has a virtio PCI device that can be plugged into 
qemu-system-sparc64 (see Artyom's blog at 
http://tyom.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/debiansparc64-wheezy-under-qemu-how-to.html 
for an example of how to do this with Linux).


This could be an amusing project; in theory it would be possible to work 
on an x86 laptop to test/debug big-endian virtio support with the help 
of QEMU's virtual hardware.  You can do this by plugging in a standard 
virtual cdrom/hd along with an additional virtio hd/nic, booting from 
the standard devices and then testing the drivers accessing the extra 
devices as required.


I should probably add that there may still be some CPU bugs lying 
around, and also you'd need a power source since as I don't believe the 
UIIi processor has any power-saving instructions (or at least QEMU 
doesn't emulate them) which causes qemu-system-sparc64 to take a lot of 
CPU...



ATB,

Mark.



Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland

On 09/09/14 21:26, Miod Vallat wrote:


Interesting. Longer term the aim of the QEMU project is to move the
hardwired machine types into pluggable devices, e.g. you can build a whole
machine on the command line from multiple -device parameters or preload the
default machine types such as sun4u using instructions from a file. So while
this is not practical now without source hacks, it is likely to become
possible in the future.


Do not expect any support for the fanciest device combinations. While
most sparc64 systems will probably be able to cope with whatever
five-feet sheeps you can build, sparc32 qemu will happily attempt to
emulate systems which make no sense, physically, and dismissing reports
that BSD does not run on such artificial setups is annoying, to say the
least.


Oh sure. It was more to make a point that at some point the QEMU machine 
will become ultimately more flexible, which I see as something useful 
for development rather than production use. As I mentioned in one of my 
earlier emails, my aim is to get the basic sun4u Ultra 5 machine good 
enough to be able to run the main Linux/*BSD/Solaris OSs out of the box 
so the final choices of hardware for the virtual device model will be 
quite limited.



ATB,

Mark.



Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 21:27:37, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
  Could the PCI virtio stuff be adapted to non-x86 architectures?
 
 QEMU already has a virtio PCI device that can be plugged into 
 qemu-system-sparc64 (see Artyom's blog at 
 http://tyom.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/debiansparc64-wheezy-under-qemu-h
 ow-to.html  for an example of how to do this with Linux).
 
 This could be an amusing project; in theory it would be possible to
 work  on an x86 laptop to test/debug big-endian virtio support with
 the help of QEMU's virtual hardware.  You can do this by plugging
 in a standard virtual cdrom/hd along with an additional virtio
 hd/nic, booting from the standard devices and then testing the
 drivers accessing the extra devices as required.

From the openbsd side, virtio should work with sparc. But since nobody 
has tested it on big endian so far, there will be bugs. And it needs 
to be enabled in the config, of course.

If you look at generic PCI network adapters, I would recommend trying 
e1000 if possible. Last time I tried it (on x86), qemu's rtl8139 
emulation did not work with openbsd's driver, and I think there were 
some problems with the ne2k emulation, too. Or maybe ne2k just had 
terrible performance.

Cheers,
Stefan



Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/09/09 21:18, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
 On 09/09/14 19:57, Brad Smith wrote:
 
 The Realtek hardware in that dmesg is an NE2000 PCI adapter which
 the sparc64 kernel config indeed does not have a driver for at the
 very moment, although it could be added. Having a QEMU driver for
 the Happy Meal MAC would provide the best level of compatibility
 with other OS's as that is what comes with a lot of Sun systems.
 
 Agreed. Once I've sorted out the NVRAM issues in theory QEMU should be able
 to run some older 64-bit Solaris 9-10 kernels, and I suspect I'll need to
 implement a virtual hme device in order for that to work.

In terms of real Solaris, one of the machine types it runs on is the
netra x1 which has a Davicom DM9102, which is a dec 21140 tulip clone
using the dc(4) driver on OpenBSD. As far as NICs go, this might not be
too horrendous to emulate - at least, Microsoft managed to emulate a
21140 in Virtual Server, and numerous NIC vendors made clones of it.



Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Mark Kettenis
 From: Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de
 Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 22:41:53 +0200
 
 On Tuesday 09 September 2014 21:27:37, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
   Could the PCI virtio stuff be adapted to non-x86 architectures?
  
  QEMU already has a virtio PCI device that can be plugged into 
  qemu-system-sparc64 (see Artyom's blog at 
  http://tyom.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/debiansparc64-wheezy-under-qemu-h
  ow-to.html  for an example of how to do this with Linux).
  
  This could be an amusing project; in theory it would be possible to
  work  on an x86 laptop to test/debug big-endian virtio support with
  the help of QEMU's virtual hardware.  You can do this by plugging
  in a standard virtual cdrom/hd along with an additional virtio
  hd/nic, booting from the standard devices and then testing the
  drivers accessing the extra devices as required.
 
 From the openbsd side, virtio should work with sparc. But since nobody 
 has tested it on big endian so far, there will be bugs. And it needs 
 to be enabled in the config, of course.
 
 If you look at generic PCI network adapters, I would recommend trying 
 e1000 if possible. Last time I tried it (on x86), qemu's rtl8139 
 emulation did not work with openbsd's driver, and I think there were 
 some problems with the ne2k emulation, too. Or maybe ne2k just had 
 terrible performance.

Sounds like faithful emulation to me ;).



Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Mike Larkin
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:56:59PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
  From: Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de
  Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 22:41:53 +0200
  
  On Tuesday 09 September 2014 21:27:37, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
Could the PCI virtio stuff be adapted to non-x86 architectures?
   
   QEMU already has a virtio PCI device that can be plugged into 
   qemu-system-sparc64 (see Artyom's blog at 
   http://tyom.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/debiansparc64-wheezy-under-qemu-h
   ow-to.html  for an example of how to do this with Linux).
   
   This could be an amusing project; in theory it would be possible to
   work  on an x86 laptop to test/debug big-endian virtio support with
   the help of QEMU's virtual hardware.  You can do this by plugging
   in a standard virtual cdrom/hd along with an additional virtio
   hd/nic, booting from the standard devices and then testing the
   drivers accessing the extra devices as required.
  
  From the openbsd side, virtio should work with sparc. But since nobody 
  has tested it on big endian so far, there will be bugs. And it needs 
  to be enabled in the config, of course.
  
  If you look at generic PCI network adapters, I would recommend trying 
  e1000 if possible. Last time I tried it (on x86), qemu's rtl8139 
  emulation did not work with openbsd's driver, and I think there were 
  some problems with the ne2k emulation, too. Or maybe ne2k just had 
  terrible performance.
 
 Sounds like faithful emulation to me ;).
 

IIRC there were problems with the rl(4)/re(4) watchdog timer not being
implemented in qemu (or implemented in a way that is incompatible with
OpenBSD), which caused a stream of watchdog timeouts. I've switched to
em(4) since about a year ago so I don't know if this is still a problem.

-ml



Re: sparc64: fledgling QEMU support

2014-09-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014/09/09 14:05, Mike Larkin wrote:
 IIRC there were problems with the rl(4)/re(4) watchdog timer not being
 implemented in qemu (or implemented in a way that is incompatible with
 OpenBSD), which caused a stream of watchdog timeouts. I've switched to
 em(4) since about a year ago so I don't know if this is still a problem.

That was re(4), fixed some time ago (I believe it was in this commit
http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=05447803d034fc634c8372091c031578043dd80d)
but it took ages to trickle over to various downstreams/distros.