Fedora 25 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing: Age URL 64 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb exim-4.87.1-1.fc25 20 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c3739273e5 mingw-gtk-vnc-0.7.0-1.fc25 12

Re: Package caching

On Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:29:33 + Russel Winder wrote: > Debian has the approx system for package caching. This is just a proxy > for caching actually demanded packages. It does mean though that I > only download once and can upgrade 5 machines. Since Internet is still >

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, 01 Mar 2017 18:04:04 + Russel Winder wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 17:58 +, Russel Winder wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 14:29 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > […] > > > > > > This should work: > > > > > > koji download-build --quiet --arch=$(uname -m)

Multiple packages installed

Advice required… I have four installations of Rawhide. Three of them seem fine, consistent, and as expected: all packages except the kernel installed once and up to date – I keep multiple kernels for fairly obvious reasons. However one machine has a large number of not fully upgraded packages.

Last released kernel

I appreciate that Rawhide always has the latest kernel snapshot as the one and only kernel and that it is up to users to manage their own kernels. However I wonder if there should be a simple, standard way of being able to install the last released kernel, perhaps a package last- release-kernel or

Re: Wallpapers on Fedora

Thanks, I'll give it a try, though thus far I haven't really needed any extensions for GNOME. I try to keep my install as stock as possible so as to report here accurately. I'll see if I can mailing list the GNOME guys, didn't get very far on IRC. On February 28, 2017 4:47:38 PM GMT+03:00,

Package caching

Debian has the approx system for package caching. This is just a proxy for caching actually demanded packages. It does mean though that I only download once and can upgrade 5 machines. Since Internet is still metered during working hours for some of us, this caching is extremely useful. So the

Re: Package caching

On Wed, 01 Mar 2017 09:29:33 + Russel Winder wrote: > Debian has the approx system for package caching. This is just a proxy > for caching actually demanded packages. It does mean though that I > only download once and can upgrade 5 machines. Since Internet is still >

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > I appreciate that Rawhide always has the latest kernel snapshot as the > one and only kernel and that it is up to users to manage their own > kernels. However I wonder if there should be a simple, standard way of > being

Re: Package caching

On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 10:45 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: […] > > you can set a private Fedora mirror using squid, my old write up is > at > http://sharkcz.livejournal.com/2534.html (my server still works :-)) > and I'm sure there were other guides too. People have mentioned "Just use Squid" in the

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 11:07 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > […] > You can always just pull it from koji either via the website or cli. > > For cli you can use "koji download-build --arch=x86_64 kernel-4.10.0- > 1.fc26" > > For web grab what ever version you want from >

Re: Last released kernel

On 01.03.2017 10:07, Russel Winder wrote: I appreciate that Rawhide always has the latest kernel snapshot as the one and only kernel and that it is up to users to manage their own kernels. However I wonder if there should be a simple, standard way of being able to install the last released

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 12:10 +, Russel Winder wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 11:07 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > […] > > You can always just pull it from koji either via the website or > > cli. > > > > For cli you can use "koji download-build --arch=x86_64 kernel- > > 4.10.0- > >

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 13:17 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > […] > Don't know if this helps, but I have > > exclude=kernel* > > in dnf.conf and use a script like > > ver=$(( $(cat /etc/redhat-release | awk '{print $3}') - 1 )) > dnf -y --disablerepo=* --releasever=$ver --enablerepo=updates*  >

Re: Package caching

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 10:45 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > […] >> >> you can set a private Fedora mirror using squid, my old write up is >> at >> http://sharkcz.livejournal.com/2534.html (my server still works :-)) >> and

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 12:10 +, Russel Winder wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 11:07 +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > >> >> […] >> > You can always just pull it from koji either via the website or >> > cli. >> > >> >

Re: Last released kernel

On 01.03.2017 13:30, Russel Winder wrote: On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 13:17 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: […] Don't know if this helps, but I have exclude=kernel* in dnf.conf and use a script like ver=$(( $(cat /etc/redhat-release | awk '{print $3}') - 1 )) dnf -y --disablerepo=* --releasever=$ver

Re: F25 much more worse then F24, I hope F26 will be better

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:19:18AM -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote: > - last dnf update took far too much time > - shutdown process not tolerable, takes too much time. > - usb connection erroneous. i.e. after copying to flash medium or > external disk connected by an usb adapter in most trials, when I

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 13:24 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > […] > It depends, sometimes they might still be in the signing queue, > sometimes they might have been replaced before they were signed but I > suspect you're using a f26 kernel on a different release which means > it'll be signed with a

Re: F25 much more worse then F24, I hope F26 will be better

Hi, thank You Matthiew, I will investigate and give more details. Kind regards -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- Von: Matthew Miller An: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases Verschickt: Mi, 1. Mrz 2017 14:45

Fedora 24 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing: Age URL 102 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-93679a91df jenkins-1.651.3-2.fc24 jenkins-remoting-2.62.3-1.fc24 71 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08 squid-3.5.23-1.fc24 64

Re: Multiple packages installed

On Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:40:05 + Russel Winder wrote: > Advice required… > > I have four installations of Rawhide. Three of them seem fine, > consistent, and as expected: all packages except the kernel installed > once and up to date – I keep multiple kernels for fairly

Re: Multiple packages installed

On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 10:12 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > […] > > It sounds very much like there was a transaction in the past that > didn't complete for whatever reason ( power lost, reboot, etc).  Aha. Of course. I was doing an upgrade a couple of weeks ago or so, and something associated with

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:24:29 + Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Russel Winder > wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 12:10 +, Russel Winder wrote: > >> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 11:07 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> > >

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 17:58 +, Russel Winder wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 14:29 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > > […] > > > > This should work: > > > > koji download-build --quiet --arch=$(uname -m) $(koji latest-build  > > --quiet f25 kernel | awk '{print $1}') I guess the import point here

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 14:29 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > […] > > This should work: > > koji download-build --quiet --arch=$(uname -m) $(koji latest-build  > --quiet f25 kernel | awk '{print $1}') > > but it downloads all the rpms of the kernel package so in the end it  > might be slower than the

Re: Last released kernel

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > I appreciate that Rawhide always has the latest kernel snapshot as the > one and only kernel and that it is up to users to manage their own > kernels. However I wonder if there should be a simple, standard way of > being

Re: F25 much more worse then F24, I hope F26 will be better

Can confirm on the very last package on my update internet speeds tanked (dnf upgrade being the command) The others I haven't experienced. On March 1, 2017 4:45:09 PM GMT+03:00, Matthew Miller wrote: >On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 06:19:18AM -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:

Re: Last released kernel

On 03/01/2017 11:18 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Russel Winder wrote: >> I appreciate that Rawhide always has the latest kernel snapshot as the >> one and only kernel and that it is up to users to manage their own >> kernels. However I wonder if