Re: trying to "dnf system-upgrade" to F30 reboots and hangs

[Alessio Ciregia]

Maybe it is someting related to this bug?



On Fri, Mar 8, 2019, 2:55 PM Robert P. J. Day 
>   still following the instructions here for upgrading to fedora 30:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade
>
> and, this time, the (massive) download succeeded, at which time i ran:
>
>   $ sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot
>
> the result of which was to ... hang. black screen. the laptop was
> still powered up (backlit keyboard was still backlit), but nothing on
> the screen, even after i left it for a while just to make sure it
> wasn't simply taking a long time.
>
>   eventually, i power-cycled and it came back to fedora 29. tried it
> again, exactly same result. i'm loath to try it a third time without
> at least a vague idea as to what might be going on.
>
>   is there a log file that i can examine? open to other suggestions as
> well.
>
> rday
>
> --
>
> 
> Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
>   http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki
>
> Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday
> LinkedIn:   http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
> 
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing Fedora 30 Workstation potential beta drop 0224

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019, 5:59 PM pmkel...@frontier.com  If you haven't already filed a bug report on this, please file one
>


Ok


> On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 19:23 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> >> g-c-c has a newly found problem with the window re-sizing the panels
> >> within the window when the Notifications, Search, Universal Access,
> >> or
> >> Network tabs are clicked. This results in the Settings becoming
> >> temporarily unusable. The work
>


And what about that? There is already an issue on bugzilla?

A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 30 Gnome 3.32 Test Day 2019-02-05

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019, 11:35 AM Alessandro  Excuse me, I'm sorry
>

BTW this list, test@lists.fedoraproject.org, is the right one where to send
and to discuss such issues.

Thank you Alessandro.
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Request Testing on 1637751 - gnome-maps

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018, 5:37 PM Geoffrey Marr  wrote:

> Julen,
>
> Thanks for testing. If possible, can you try testing on a bare-metal
> install and see if you have the glitch?
>

On a laptop (nvidia graphic card with noveau driver), I have the same
behaviour we can see in the video attached to the bug.

Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: DNF test day.

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:40 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
 wrote:
>
> I tried to run the dnf test day cases, but didn't have much luck. The

Similar issue here.

# dnf update --refresh
Fedora Modular 29 - x86_64   15 kB/s |  20 kB 00:01
Fedora Modular 29 - x86_64 - Updates 26 kB/s |  26 kB 00:00
Fedora Modular 29 - x86_64 - Test Updates81 kB/s |  23 kB 00:00
Fedora 29 - x86_64 - Test Updates11 kB/s |  24 kB 00:02
Fedora 29 - x86_64 - Test Updates   1.7 MB/s | 9.6 MB 00:05
Fedora 29 - x86_64 - Updates 22 kB/s |  26 kB 00:01
Fedora 29 - x86_64   12 kB/s |  20 kB 00:01
Dependencies resolved.

 Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package
libnghttp2-1.33.0-1.fc29.x86_64
  - package libnghttp2-1.33.0-1.module_2177+2526c218.x86_64 is excluded
Nothing to do.
Complete!

Looking at bugzilla, I found this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616118#c25
I also installed libsolv-0.6.35-3.fc29 from koji, but the problem remains.
(I'm using Fedora Server).

Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unusable dnf after dnf system-upgrade to F29

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 6:29 PM Adam Williamson 
wrote:

>
> Please don't tell people to delete it. Ask them to *rename* it. Access
> to the files associated with bugs like this very useful for the
> developers to debug them. Thanks.
>

Yeah yeah. Sorry. :-)

Thanks,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unusable dnf after dnf system-upgrade to F29

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 5:27 PM Frantisek Zatloukal 
wrote:

> Can you try to delete this file?
>> /var/lib/dnf/history.sqlite
>>
>
> Maybe try to backup that file first, it might be useful for tracking down
> and fixing that bug.
>

Sorry. You are right. It is always better to backup a file instead to
remove it.

Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Unusable dnf after dnf system-upgrade to F29

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 1:55 PM Ankur Sinha  wrote:

> Hiya,
>
> I upgraded to F29 via dnf last evening and it went off without a hitch.
> However, now dnf is unusable. Each time I try to run it, I get this:
>

Can you try to delete this file?
/var/lib/dnf/history.sqlite
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: proposal: drop optical media from release criteria

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 10:26 PM Matthew Miller 
wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 04:17:52PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > I burn CDs regularly for my wife.  I cannot do this on my F28 Xfce
> > system with k3b. See bug 1583845.  I have to use my F24 old system.
> > Can't burn DVDs (for backups of video lectures) either.
>
> Burning DVDs is a completely separate issue.
>

Indeed.
Again. The proposal is just to remove
the test as a blocking release criteria.

> +1 to the proposal

Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 9:26 PM Adam Williamson
 wrote:
> Can anyone who is still struggling with DNF crashes on *basic*
> operations on F29 or Rawhide please reply, and provide a few details on
> what you're seeing and any workarounds or fixes you've found?


FWIW, I never hit such problem.
The only way to get in troubles consists in hammering the history.sqlite file:
echo 1 > /var/lib/dnf/history.sqlite

Now almost all dnf operations fails (except dnf search):

dnf update
...
RuntimeError: C++ std::exception: Exec failed: file is not a database

And in the journal:
Sep 14 10:20:11 hostname python3[8830]: detected unhandled Python
exception in '/usr/bin/dnf'
Sep 14 10:20:11 hostname abrt-notification[8856]: Process 8830 (dnf)
of user 0 encountered an uncaught RuntimeError exception
-- Subject: ABRT has detected an uncaught RuntimeError exception in dnf
...

Deleting the "corrupted" history.sqlite, it restores the normal situation.

Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: What about interoperability test day?

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 12:02 PM Sumantro Mukherjee 
wrote:

> Hey!
>
> This can also be covered as a part of Gnome Test day. we just need to add
> the test cases. It usually happens during every beta.
>

Yeah, you are right, I can't check right now which tests we are supposed to
run during this test days. Maybe I can propose, and write the steps for
additional tests, right? Like, as stated in the previous mail, online
accounts as well gmail calendar integration, mount remote resources (cifs,
sftp).

Thanks
A.

>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WHSRB5K5M7DDKPKBYRLR4DTK3FLSW6CI/

Kernel test day

[Alessio Ciregia]

As you know tomorrow will be a kernel test day.
It is fine to use F29 to test 4.18 kernel?

Thanks,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6QLWNXAZHKRVMI2NQVW7OKPEB3UOZFMR/

What about interoperability test day?

[Alessio Ciregia]

Hello.
I would like to ask if a test day about interoperability, if it is the
right term to use, makes sense.
Test cases that come to mind could be related to online accounts (in
gnome), to mount remote resources (cifs, sftp, etc.) in nautilus, and ssh
to remote servers.
Such test days I think could be organized when each beta release hits the
road.
What do you think?

Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BOARAFKOSUQEYKR25MHABK64GIVS5RCW/

Re: Kernel Test Results Failed to Send

[Alessio Ciregia]

I hit the same issue, but on F29.
Try to install python3-fedora with dnf.



Ciao,
A.

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 8:26 PM Garry Williams  wrote:

> I just upgraded to 4.17.7-200.fc28.x86_64 and ran the kernel tests.
> When the results were to be sent, I got this:
>
> Test suite complete  PASS
>
> Your log file is being submitted...
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "./fedora_submit.py", line 6, in 
> from fedora.client import OpenIdBaseClient
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'fedora'
>
> (Yes, I did git pull first.)
>
> --
> Garry Williams
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TSKMU2PFRBMKF4BVABQRHZMHVQ2L5Q7I/
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RORSSULFIDDZBUGNI4DVHUWZSIQL3PNU/

F29 network issues

[Alessio Ciregia]

Using F29 I've spotted that sometimes (1 time every 5 reboots, more or
less) the network interface doesn't work. Upon reboots, the network
address of the ethernet interface is not configured.

Issuing the command
  nmcli connection show
I get that the NetworkManager is not running.
Starting the service, the network start to work.

I've spotted this issue on two F29 installations.
How to diagnose this behaviour?

Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZLAT7ECYLPILVTPVIF5HBSUKBQTEETSB/

kernel-tests on F29

[Alessio Ciregia]

Just for information.
kernel-tests on F29 requires python3-fedora (and not python-fedora).

In addition, running such tool on F29 (kernel
4.18.0-0.rc2.git4.1.fc29.x86_64) I get this vulnerability status:

/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/meltdown:Mitigation: PTI
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spec_store_bypass:Vulnerable
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v1:Mitigation: __user
pointer sanitization
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v2:Mitigation: Full
generic retpoline

Is this ok?

Thanks,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/66L46ILNRBVPHGWP247Y3DVED7MFQHOE/

Re: [Test-Announce] [Test Day] Kernel 4.16 2018-04-13

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 5:09 AM Sumantro Mukherjee 
wrote:

> Hey All,
>
> Tuesday 2018-04-13 will be Kernel Test Day[1] Test Day! As Fedora 28
> will be using 4.16 , we want to test it across all arcs and different
> variants of F28.
>

Hello.
I would like to know if the kernel test tool is supposed to work on
architectures others than x86. Because as reported on pagure [1], the last
times I have used the tool on a Raspberry Pi I got a lot of messages and
some failures. And, since I'm not an expert, I don't understand if it is
the tool itself that is not designed for ARM, or if the reported failures
are true.

[1] 

Thanks,
A.

>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Live CD creator

[Alessio Ciregia]

2018-04-02 22:38 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Livemedia-creator-_How_to_create_and_use_a_Live_CD
> provides some help with using it. Good luck!

Thanks!

A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Live CD creator

[Alessio Ciregia]

Hello.
Let's say I want to try a package not included in a Live CD, or in
other words, I would like to add a package to the Live CD, maybe an
updated package from koji. Or in short, I want to create a Live CD.
Is livecd-tools the right choice? Is livecd-creator the right tool?

Thanks,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Keyboard layout

[Alessio Ciregia]

Hello.
Installing F28 using the Live image, I selected a keyboard layout
other than English.
Once installed, after the reboot, in the initial setup phase, the
layout is still English, so the user must take care of non
alphabetical characters, for instance, while setting up the passwords.

Have you spotted the same issue? Anyway I filed a bug: 1561864.


Thanks,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Testcase upgrade previous workstation encrypted problem

[Alessio Ciregia]

Performing the test case "upgrade dnf previous workstation encrypted"
I hit the following problem: once upgraded F26 to F28, after the log
in, I'm flooded by a never ending selinux notifications.
I hit the same issue upgrading the system using either dnf or
gnome-software as well.

I'm able to reproduce the issue also after the Beta 1.2 compose hits
the road right today.

Yesterday I filed a bug, 1561072
The bug was closed providing a solution (running fixfiles command)
that in fact resolves the issue.

However this doesn't meet the test requirement, since the upgrade
should lead to a system not showing any crash or warning report; so
the bug should not have been closed. Isn't it?


Ciao
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180324.n.0.iso

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:21 PM pmkel...@frontier.com 
wrote:

> Since the Gnome 3.28.0 test object for today was delivered as
> Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180324.n.0.iso, I went ahead and did
> the rest of the testing. I was surprised when I could not report the
> results. relval said there was no test event for 20180324.n.0. Did I do
> something wrong



Hello. Maybe someone else can explain better than me.
However, every day one or more composes are produced (let's call them
nightly builds) but you can report the results (directly on the wiki or via
relval) only on composes nominated for test (test event). Such nomination
is made automatically based on some heuristic rules.
In fact, if you visit the wiki page containing the results [1] you are not
supposed to find the latest compose, but instead the last nominated for
testing.
I think you can find more info here [2].

I hope I didn't wrote anything wrong.


[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_Branched_20180323.n.0_Installation
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan#Nightly_validation


Ciao
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: The new gnome-software update with "third party repositories" support

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018, 1:30 PM Ankur Sinha  wrote:

> 
> Was this discussed somewhere? Could someone please point me to a ticket
> or an ML thread if it was? I must've missed it.
>


I think that this discussion in the council could be related to this new
behavior: "Request for final approval of third party software proposal" [1].

Even if personally I'm not very happy, the decision has been taken.
However I don't actually know the criteria or any further discussion on
which repos should be included: could someone provide some link?

[1] 


Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Help test GNOME 3.28.0 megaupdate

[Alessio Ciregia]

2018-03-16 12:35 GMT+01:00 Felipe Borges :
>
> And after some time it falls back into emergency mode.
>
> The media test also fails. I have downloaded it three times to make sure.
>
> Has somebody else run into the same problem?


Same problem here.

A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Local Test Cloud Installation and sudo

[Alessio Ciregia]

2018-03-14 12:47 GMT+01:00 Lukas Brabec :
> I just tried Fedora-Cloud-Base-28-20180313.n.0.x86_64.qcow2 and sudo works
> as expected without any errors, it's probably fixed.

Yeah. You are right.
I was using the latestest compose nominated for testing.

Thank you.
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Local Test Cloud Installation and sudo

[Alessio Ciregia]

2018-03-14 12:13 GMT+01:00 Lukas Brabec :

> Nope, that is not expected. It seems that
> Fedora-Cloud-Base-28-20180310.n.0.x86_64.qcow2 is missing the
> libsss_sudo.so. Could you please file a bug?

Sure.

Thank you,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Local Test Cloud Installation and sudo

[Alessio Ciregia]

Using Fedora-Cloud-Base-28-20180310.n.0.x86_64.qcow2 and following the
Local Test Cloud Installation Guide [1], once logged in via SSH, if I
use the sudo command, I get this warning:

sudo: unable to load /usr/lib64/libsss_sudo.so:
/usr/lib64/libsss_sudo.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
sudo: unable to initialize SSS source. Is SSSD installed on your machine?

The command subsequently works; I can imagine that in the base
installation are not included some "inessential" packages for the
installation type, however: do you know if is this expected?


[1] 

Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Test Results wiki page info

[Alessio Ciregia]

Hello.
In the Test Results wiki page, in the table containing all the media
available for the download, there is a new column named "src": what is
this?

Thanks,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testcase upgrade gnome-software current workstation

[Alessio Ciregia]

2018-03-03 11:08 GMT+01:00 Kalev Lember :
> There's probably something that has broken dependencies. Can you try
> doing 'dnf distro-sync --releasever=28 --best' (and press 'no' when it
> asks if you want to continue) and post the output somewhere? It should
> say somewhere why it wants to remove all of those packages.

Here you can find the output of such command:


Thanks,
Alessio
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Testcase upgrade gnome-software current workstation

[Alessio Ciregia]

Hello.
I was following the test case "upgrade gnome-software current
workstation" [1] upgrading F27 to F28 using GNOME Software.
I got the warn as in the screenshot [2] stating that fwupdate related
software is incompatible with Fedora 28. Is this ok?

Thanks,
A.

[1] 

[2] 

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] [REPORT] Kernel 4.15 Test Day 2018-02-22

[Alessio Ciregia]

2018-03-02 9:52 GMT+01:00 Sumantro Mukherjee :
> Hey All,
>
> Hi folks! Test Day[1] on Kernel 4.15 was a great success! Here's the Test Day 
> report.

Great!

A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: anyone else seeing long delay before responsiveness after resume?

[Alessio Ciregia]

2017-10-21 21:28 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller :

> With my up-to-date F27 beta Workstation system, on resume from suspend,
> there's a long (5-20 second) period of non-responsiveness. The "shield"
> screen is shown, and there's a mouse cursor, but it won't move typing
> doesn't appear to do anything. After a few seconds, it unfreezes and I
> get the password entry box. This didn't happen before the update --
> anyone else seeing similar?
>

No such issue here.

--
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Beta 1.5 and Virtualbox

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Oct 3, 2017 9:09 AM, "Tenk Tenk"  wrote:

I install the Fedora 27 Live workstation Beta using basic graphics mode on
virtualbox, boot on the new installed system and it's work as usuale.
So there are an easy workaround for this one.


So we should document this in the common bugs wiki page. What do you think?

Ciao
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Running most recent update from updates-testing repo proposes to erase k3b (incompatibility with poppler and k3b)

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Oct 12, 2017 18:50, "Joachim Backes" 
wrote:

Trying to run f26 update including updates-testing repo wants to uninstall
k3b (Skipping packages with conflicts:
(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade):
 k3b  x86_64 1:17.04.1-1.fc26
 poppler  x86_640.52.0-2.fc26
 poppler  x86_640.52.0-8.fc26
  updates-testing830 k)

Anybody sees this too?


Yes. But in F27.
Try to "add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their
upgrade", then install k3b again.

Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Beta 1.5 and Virtualbox

[Alessio Ciregia]

2017-10-03 15:01 GMT+02:00 Quentin Tayssier :

> I am interrested to know if you have this in your log.
>
> clutter_input_device_get_device_type assertion failed
> CLUTTER_IS_INPUT_DEVICE (device) failed
> JS ERROR: TypeError: device is null
>
> https://github.com/GNOME/mutter/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93;
> q=CLUTTER_IS_INPUT_DEVICE=
>

Sorry, but I cannot spot such error anywhere.

However. When GDM is running and I see the black screen, so supposedly
there is the user name displayed, then I hit Enter and I type my password,
looking at the logs I can see a successful login...

Ciao,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Beta 1.5 and Virtualbox

[Alessio Ciregia]

Finally I was able to install F27 using netinstall and text interface.
I'm able to login in a text console, and to enable ssh.
Using startx I'm able to get the GNOME GUI.
But, instead of startx, if I issue the command "systemctl start gdm" the
virtualbox screen goes black.
If I stop gdm (via ssh), I get a core dump. Process 1273 (gnome-shell) of
user 42 dumped core.
I'm collecting logs in order to file a bug.

Ciao
A.


2017-10-03 9:50 GMT+02:00 Quentin Tayssier <ten...@gmail.com>:

> Just to be complete , i got the issue if i boot normaly with the Fedora 27
> Live Workstation image Beta. Got this issue the first time i try to boot a
> Fedora 27 Live workstation for a testday that need Workstation (probalbly
> september 19 th).
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Alessio Ciregia <alcir...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 3, 2017 09:09, "Tenk Tenk" <ten...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I install the Fedora 27 Live workstation Beta using basic graphics mode
>> on virtualbox, boot on the new installed system and it's work as usuale.
>> So there are an easy workaround for this one.
>>
>>
>> Nice to know.
>> Btw, I can not be more precise right now, but I had issues even with
>> basic graphics mode, and also with netinstall. In short, maybe my fault, I
>> have not yet been able to install F27 on virtualbox. :-(
>>
>> Ciao
>> A.
>>
>> ___
>> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>>
>
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Beta 1.5 and Virtualbox

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Oct 3, 2017 09:09, "Tenk Tenk"  wrote:

I install the Fedora 27 Live workstation Beta using basic graphics mode on
virtualbox, boot on the new installed system and it's work as usuale.
So there are an easy workaround for this one.


Nice to know.
Btw, I can not be more precise right now, but I had issues even with basic
graphics mode, and also with netinstall. In short, maybe my fault, I have
not yet been able to install F27 on virtualbox. :-(

Ciao
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Beta 1.5 and Virtualbox

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Sep 30, 2017 06:37, "Ed Greshko"  wrote:

> But F26 workstation live works without any issue. Isn't Wayland in use
also in the
> previous versions of Fedora?

Sure.  But this is a new version.  So, a change could have been made that
is causing
this.


In any case I think that it is a bad issue. I can suppose that many people
use virtualbox, for instance as a way to try Linux distributions, and
shipping a release not booting on it, isn't nice.
Saying this I mean that we should better investigate this issue.

Ciao
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Beta 1.5 and Virtualbox

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Sep 30, 2017 03:42, "Ed Greshko"  wrote:

I don't know what you mean by "basic graphics mode".   But I confirmed your
observation with WS Live.  I'm


I mean using the safe graphics mode under troubleshooting menu.

 it is trying to start in Wayland and not
detecting that it isn't in a Wayland capable environment.


But F26 workstation live works without any issue. Isn't Wayland in use also
in the previous versions of Fedora?

Greetings
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Beta 1.5 and Virtualbox

[Alessio Ciregia]

I'm unable to use Fedora 27 beta 1.5 in Virtualbox: the screen (inside the
VM) become black.
I've not spotted this issue in previous composes.
Someone is aware of this issue?

Thank you.
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Kernel test day

[Alessio Ciregia]

In the community blog it is stated that: "Monday, 2017-09-27" is kernel
4.13 test day. But September 27 is Wednesday: so, the test day is today or
is it the day after tomorrow?

Thanks.
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Branched 20170617.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

[Alessio Ciregia]

Missing expected images:

Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Kde live i386
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing request: libdb -21 for F24 and F25

[Alessio Ciregia]

2017-06-08 17:37 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :

> Hi folks!
>
> So there are F24 and F25 updates for libdb in updates-testing as part
> of the effort to fix
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397087 , the F26 Beta
>

I tried to upgrade from F25 to F26 a RPi3 (arm) following
QA:Testcase_upgrade_dnf_current_server and without installing libdb -21
update: the upgrade process got stuck on cleaning up some package.

Then I did a fresh install of F25 on such device. Before performing the
system upgrade I installed this package update: the system upgrade was
successful.

Ciao
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Netinst taking long time to look at a mirror?

[Alessio Ciregia]

Using netinst images, I'm experiencing a long time waiting for setting up
installation source.
I'm using KVM, and in a NAT configuration it seems that, in addition, there
are issues with geoip (geoip.fedoraproject.org), or in other words
determining the location. Maybe this is a expected behaviour.
Thinking that the two issues were linked, I've set up a bridge
configuration. Now the location is successfully determined (the proposed
language is no more English in the first screen of the installation
process). Anyway the Installation Source continues to take a long time
before being available.

Someone is experiencing the same issues?
Is it an expected behaviour since that there are not so many mirrors around
the world working for Fedora 26?


Thanks
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: SELinux is preventing useradd from using the net_admin capability.

[Alessio Ciregia]

2017-06-01 10:23 GMT+02:00 Shakhar Dasgupta :

> Hi everyone,
>
> I am not sure whether this should be considered a bug. For testing
> Testcase_desktop_login, I needed two user accounts. I created the root and
> first user account during installation. I logged in using the first user
> account and tried to create the second account using "Settings -> User".
> After using the root password, I created a new account. Then I got an
> SELinux Alert. It looks like this:
> 
> --
> SELinux is preventing useradd from using the net_admin capability.
>
> *  Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests
> **
>
> If you believe that useradd should have the net_admin capability by
> default.
>


Maybe it is related to 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

[Alessio Ciregia]

2017-05-31 9:50 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :

> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 06:57 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
> > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
>
> Note that I messed up the compose request for this a bit and it's
> definitely missing some FEs that should've been in it and *may* be
> missing a blocker fix. So there may well be a 1.4. I'll update in the
> morning. Sorry!


Excuse me. Then it is pointless to test 1.3?

Ciao
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Another silly question

[Alessio Ciregia]

2017-05-18 23:53 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller :

> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:21:33AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > image to test with. This isn't actually super hard, though you do need
> > somewhere to host a repository via HTTP (unless there's a way to pass a
> > local repo to lorax that I don't know about). Create a repo with the
>
> Lorax takes file:/// URLs.
>

I confirm that file URL works.
Make the directory a repomd repository with: "createrepo -v /var/tmp/repo"
(/var/tmp/repo contains some RPMs)
Then issue the command
sudo lorax -p Fedora -v 26 -r 26 -s
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-26-20170518.n.0/compose/Everything/x86_64/os/
-s file:///var/tmp/repo ./results

Thanks. There is always something to learn.
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Another silly question

[Alessio Ciregia]

Let's say that a package was updated.
Such package is involved in the installation process, like for example
anaconda. I'm referring, for instance, to this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.
com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451754

How to test it? We need to wait the next compose that includes such updated
package?


Thanks
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: What is Everything boot

[Alessio Ciregia]

2017-05-16 18:45 GMT+02:00 stan <stanl-fedorau...@vfemail.net>:

> On Mon, 15 May 2017 19:53:36 +0200
> Alessio Ciregia <alcir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Just another question: where "product image" or "flavor-specific
> > configuration" (do these terms refer to the same thing, right?) are
> > defined?
>
> (Yes)
> I think that is here,
> https://getfedora.org/
> about half way down the page on the left.  This shows the various
> flavors of Fedora available other than workstation, server, or atomic.
> That is mostly about the desktop they run, or the hardware they run on.
>

No no, this is ok. I mean, where is the default set of installed packages
defined?
Where is the default partition scheme specified?
I mean, there should be something like a configuration file at compose
time, isn't it?
Or in other words, there is a document that describe how the build process
of an image works?

Sorry for bothering you.
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: What is Everything boot

[Alessio Ciregia]

Ok. Thank you all for the explanations.
Just another question: where "product image" or "flavor-specific
configuration" (do these terms refer to the same thing, right?) are defined?

Thank you
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

What is Everything boot

[Alessio Ciregia]

Excuse my question, but I'm pretty new in the Fedora community, so I'm
still not very practical with terminology.

What is Everything boot? What is the difference between Everything boot
and, in example, Workstation boot?

Thanks in advance.
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Langpacks

[Alessio Ciregia]

I was wondering why, if I install Fedora Workstation in a language other
than English, I can find langpacks-en.noarch installed, but not the one
related to the language selected during the installation process.

In fact, while many applications are in the language selected during the
installation phase (and during the gnome initial setup), for instance
LibreOffice and man pages are still in English, and I have to install
langpacks-it by hand.


Ciao
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing requests: blocker bug confirmations

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Apr 25, 2017 13:22, "Michael Schwendt"  wrote:


The latter request is not so helpful, since it turns this into a popularity
contest and may depend on which websites are visited.


Well, it is true that this request could easily turn into a contest. But
looking at the bug report, it seems this is an always reproducible issue.
But if a big part of us are not affected, maybe we need more investigation,
but the bug should not be considered as a blocking one.
As stated before if I visit Twitter (as reported in bugzilla) or the link
you have posted, I don't hit any Firefox crash under various installations
of Fedora.

Ciao
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing requests: blocker bug confirmations

[Alessio Ciregia]

2017-04-25 1:51 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :

>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439282 (Firefox tabs
> crashing on certain sites)
>
> For the first one, if you run Firefox (from the Fedora package) on
> Fedora 26, if you see tabs crashing unexpectedly, can you look at the
> bug report (and some of the instructions for getting more information
> on the crashes) and see if your experience matches any of the reporters
> in the bug, and if so add a comment to the bug? On the other hand, if
> you run Firefox (from the Fedora package) on Fedora 26 and you have
> *not* had issues with tabs crashing regularly, please reply to this
> mail and say so.
>

I used Firefox 51.0.1 on Fedora 26 Alpha 1.7, Firefox 52.0.2 and 53.0 on
Fedora 26 and Fedora 25, all on a 64bit machine, and I have never
encountered any of the problems reported in such bugzilla ticket.

My 2 cents,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Progress bar

[Alessio Ciregia]

On Apr 23, 2017 17:42, "Chris Murphy"  wrote:

The progress bar is almost useless. A bunch of research has been done
on progress estimation, and it's actually a hard problem.


That's ok. Generally speaking, progress bar is only a visual effect and it
can report wrong informations. A famous progress bar was the one visible
during the Mac os X boot process, that was based on the last boot time and
not on any estimation.
What I mean is that, while percentage​goes on, progress bar is full from
start to finish, there are no progresses from 0 to 100%
And I haven't spotted such issue on previous versions of Fedora. If I'm not
wrong.

Ciao
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Progress bar

[Alessio Ciregia]

During installation, the progress bar is "full", all blue I mean, during
the installing software process. Even if the percentage of the installation
is not 100%

I'm using Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-26-20170420.n.0.iso

Is this expected?


Ciao
A
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Just a question

[Alessio Ciregia]

Ok. Found the answer: <https://lists.fedoraproject.
org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/
HCBFJCWHRIJBTBSU3UHC6GBRANXN6ORF/>



On Mar 12, 2017 14:00, "Alessio Ciregia" <alcir...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Excuse my ignorance.
> The wiki[1] points to Fedora 26 Branched 20170307.n.0
> But I have used 20170310, I think.
> And as far as I can understand there is a new build almost every day.
> I cannot understand that. If a test is successful today, maybe tomorrow
> could go wrong?
>
> Thanks.
> A.
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_26_
> Branched_20170307.n.0_Summary?rd=Test_Results:Current_Summary
>
> On Mar 12, 2017 13:26, "Sumantro Mukherjee" <sumuk...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> - Alessio Ciregia <alcir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I've performed the Testcase Boot Methods Pxeboot (
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Pxeboot) for
>> x86_64
>> > platform. It seems to work without any issue.
>> >
>> > My question is: is that sufficient? So I can edit the wiki and put
>> PASSED
>> > in the related section?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > A.
>>
>> If the new system boots properly , you can edit with 'PASS'
>> ___
>> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Just a question

[Alessio Ciregia]

Excuse my ignorance.
The wiki[1] points to Fedora 26 Branched 20170307.n.0
But I have used 20170310, I think.
And as far as I can understand there is a new build almost every day.
I cannot understand that. If a test is successful today, maybe tomorrow
could go wrong?

Thanks.
A.

[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_26_Branched_20170307.n.0_Summary?rd=Test_Results:Current_Summary

On Mar 12, 2017 13:26, "Sumantro Mukherjee" <sumuk...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> - Alessio Ciregia <alcir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've performed the Testcase Boot Methods Pxeboot (
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Pxeboot) for
> x86_64
> > platform. It seems to work without any issue.
> >
> > My question is: is that sufficient? So I can edit the wiki and put PASSED
> > in the related section?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > A.
>
> If the new system boots properly , you can edit with 'PASS'
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Just a question

[Alessio Ciregia]

I've performed the Testcase Boot Methods Pxeboot (
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Pxeboot) for x86_64
platform. It seems to work without any issue.

My question is: is that sufficient? So I can edit the wiki and put PASSED
in the related section?

Thanks,
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org