At 07:24 PM 9/20/00 -0300, George White wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Hans Hagen wrote:
Appearances will suffer if you just do a straight replacement of lbr with
cmr or pos.
The problem is that the user doesn't get helpful feedback if they try to
use lbr under the impression that it should
George White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
It would be nice to see ConTeXt used by more people, but I am
concerned that if it becomes as readily available as plain tex then
people will assume that it has a similar license, and as a result,
violate the license unintentionally. This implies
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Hans Hagen wrote:
At 07:02 PM 9/19/00 -0300, George White wrote:
Note: this thread started out as a discussion of whether the ConTeXt
formats should be enabled by default in teTeX. Behind this is an
underlying concern that many system administrators will only support
Note: this thread started out as a discussion of whether the ConTeXt
formats should be enabled by default in teTeX. Behind this is an
underlying concern that many system administrators will only support
the default, so if a user wants ConTeXt they will have to create their
own texmf directory
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Thomas Esser wrote:
Is there a reason why the context formats are commented out in the
fmtutil.cnf file? I'm sure that uncommenting it in the tetex
Yes. I restrict teTeX to the formats which I consider "basic". These are
plain and latex. I might change my view with
George White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
There are some restrictions in the ConTeXt license, so it is
probably better to require that someone (presumably one who has read
the documentation!) has to explicitly enable ConTeXt.
You may want to check that. I don't think that is why the
