> Thanks, I reported it to AMS but maybe that was not the right place.
> Where should I report the bug?
how did you report it? i recall seeing a discussion of the problem on
one of the latex project internal lists, but that would only happen if
you had reported it to latexbugs/amslatex, or if mi
On 2002-11-05 09:43:15 +0100, Erik Frisk wrote:
> Thanks, I reported it to AMS but maybe that was not the right place.
> Where should I report the bug?
File a LaTeX bug with the category amslatex.
Best regards
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de
> Thanks, I reported it to AMS but maybe that was not the right place.
> Where should I report the bug?
the ams is as good a place as any, for getting the bug fixed.
however, if you'd reported it via the latex bugs system, it would (a)
have been immediately forwarded to the ams, and (b) have bee
Thanks, I reported it to AMS but maybe that was not the right place.
Where should I report the bug?
/Erik
-
Erik Friskemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Electrical Engineering t
Hi,
Debugging shows that this bug is in amslatex, and more specifically,
in the files amsmath.sty and amsgen.sty, where they mess around redefining
the \@ifnextchar command (i don't know why they want to do that).
if you insert this into the document (e.g. just after the \begin{document}):
\makea
+ Erik Frisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| below is a document that fails with teTeX-beta 20020530 (unfortunately I
| have no possibility to try the latest beta). There seem to be some
| problems with \mathfrak and AMSfonts since the text
| [2002/01/19v2.2gAMSfontdefinitions] appears in the middle of the
Hi,
below is a document that fails with teTeX-beta 20020530 (unfortunately I
have no possibility to try the latest beta). There seem to be some
problems with \mathfrak and AMSfonts since the text
[2002/01/19v2.2gAMSfontdefinitions] appears in the middle of the matrix.
I tested this with the MikTe
