Hello Paul,
Tetex contains a file lgr10u.tfm, but no corresponding mf file.
lgr10u is a font which is build into some HP LaserWriters. This is for
use with the dvilj* drivers.
Also, the .tfm file for suet14 does not correspond to the mf file.
Maybe the checksums in the pk files for suet14
First problem: the tetex 1.0.6 release says to report problems to
an address "tetex-pretest"
Where exactly?
In the file PROBLEMS.
Ah, I see and I'll fix this.
Thanks,
Thomas
Digital UNIX V4.0F (Rev. 1229); Wed Feb 2 10:48:03 MET 2000
and needed to add a new achritecture (mine is alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f)
to the */config.sub files.
It seems like the most recent version of config.sub / config.guess
available from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/config/ already support the
[Note: I have added Piet Tutelaers, author of dutch96.pat, to the Cc: list]
ftp.tue.nl/pub/tex/GB95/spell-nl-v5b/afbreking/patronen/dutch96.pat
Both, the currently used version (nehyph2.tex) and this one have a
"no sell" restriction.
This contradicts my aim of a teTeX which is free of this
(Incidentally, the reason that I asked my earlier question was that I
installed Omega 1.11 on our site recently, and was concerned that if it
wasn't in teTeX, then maybe it was because it was a buggy version or
something. With the second question about the contents of ftp.dante.de,
Well, if
I suggest that updmap uses kpsewhich to find the locations of the
actual *.map files -- additionally I would like to have my own updmap
program in my local texmf tree so that the main TEXMF tree can stay
completely clean. This would imply that the texconfig script (or
whichever program
Can anybody tell me, where I can find beta_2804 ?
I've tried ftp://ftp.rrzn.uni-hannover.de/pub/local/misc/teTeX-beta
Both, CTAN and ftp.rrzn.uni-hannover.de directly access my machine. There
seems to be a problem with ftp.rrzn.uni-hannover.de and the admin is on
vacation. So, I recommend
You can get it from:
CTAN:/systems/unix/teTeX-beta
The version sitting there is 2000/08/07
Right. CTAN and ftp.rrzn.uni-hannover.de both mirror from my machine. The
rrzn has a problem with the ftpd I use (latest wu-ftp) and their mirror
does not work at the moment.
Thomas
It has been pointed out to me that some of the links in teTeX's local version
of Graham Williams' TeX catalogue are bad. Specifically, the folder and star
links on many of the entries/*.html point to nowhere. For a specific example,
look at the entry for "accents."
The Catalogue is
the lucidabr.map file contains some entries with "850 ExtendFont"
which probably should have been ".85 ExtendFont"
Yes, some version did have that bug. But, it was fixed some time ago.
Thomas
Just to fix two small problems in the current teTeX-beta, I have created
a new (src) pretest release: 20001218. The diff is very short and I have
appended it to this mail.
Thomas
diff -ru teTeX-src-beta-2807/ChangeLog teTeX-src-beta-20001218/ChangeLog
--- teTeX-src-beta-2807/ChangeLog
Giuseppe Ghibo' writes:
there is a recently-announced textrace program which goes some of
URL?
ur, um, I have lost it! did anyone else record it?
http://freshmeat.net/projects/textrace/
Thomas
I just have fixed the depend.mk files for xdvik / oxdvik in the teTeX
pretest. The two new files that I just have uploaded to my server are
teTeX-src-beta-20011103-20011104.xdelta
teTeX-src-beta-20011104.tar.gz
They will appear on CTAN in systems/unix/teTeX-beta in the next few
hours. I will
Yesterday I have uploaded a new texmf tarball which is quite up-to-date
I think (please let me know about any outdated/wrong stuff in it).
Is cm-super included?
No. But I have not yet finally decided about including it in future.
Thomas
Hi,
I just have uploaded
teTeX-src-beta-20011202.tar.gz
teTeX-texmf-beta-20011202.tar.gz
teTeX-texmfsrc-beta-20011202.tar.gz
to the teTeX-beta area (will soon appear at CTAN:systems/unix/teTeX-beta).
The main change for the src-tarball is the merge with web2c-7.3.7
pretest and a bugfix
But I admit that it is a bit difficult (Hans Hagen changed the ISP and
was not yet able to move the DNS over to the new provider). The official
Yes, I have downloaded from the wrong site. Oh, if only CTAN was really
*comprehensive*...
page is: http://ds035.xs4all.nl/download.htm
Ok, I just
Current is 2001.11.13, 13.14
You have
2001.7.11, 16.33
can you explain what 13.14 and 16.33 mean? is there some sort
of versioning here?
It is 2001.11.13.13.14 on Hans' server.
My interpretation is
.MM.DD.HH.MM
in which case why does it go backwards?
:-)
Thomas
-- After configuring, there is no libs/xpdf/xpdf/c-auto.h. I went to
libs/xpdf and configured again (by hand) and xpdf/c-auto.h was created.
This did not happen in the first run (I did a make clean in the root dir
and then did another make) which makes me suspect that 'make clean'
--with-system-t1lib doesn't work, too. From config.log:
...
It seems the check for t1lib is broken?
Yes. Even more broken is the libtype1 stuff, because libtype1 is
usually part of libt1. So, the configure options for libtype1 do not
make any sense.
I think that I have fixed these issues now.
The patch to implement this is simple:
--- tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202.orig/texk/tetex/texconfig
+++ tetex-bin-1.0.7+20011202/texk/tetex/texconfig
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@
{ u=`uname -s`; } 2/dev/null
case $u in
FreeBSD|Linux)
+ test -f /usr/bin/whiptail
Dear Thomas, just to know, do you plan to add dvipdfm and ttf2pk support
in your latest beta?
BTW, do you plan also to include the tx/pxfonts (they are GPL)
in the main texmf tree? As I've not seen yet them in 20011202 beta.
There are other things that I plan to do first. A stable teTeX
While we are being nosy... Are there any plans to include Type1
versions of the EC fonts, like cmsuper or so? Or has this already
happened?
Has not happened and will propably not happen in the near future.
Thomas
Hi,
I am pleased to announce a new teTeX pretest release. Download from
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20020129.tar.gz
or use any other CTAN mirror. It might take a few hours until dante and
the other CTAN hosts and mirros pick up the file from my server.
-- I would like to suggest the inclusion of framed.sty by Donald Arseneau
Seems very reasonable. Done.
-- shouldn't pdfpages be under $TEXMF/tex/pdlatex instead of
$TEXMF/tex/latex?
tex/pdflatex does not make sense. We could use pdftex/latex, but I don't
see what we'd gain by this.
--
Hi,
I am pleased to announce a new teTeX pretest release. Download from
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20020401.tar.gz
or use any other CTAN mirror. It might take a few hours until dante and
the other CTAN hosts and mirros pick up the file from my server.
Hi,
just today, a new texinfo (4.2) appeared and I have upgraded it and
released a new teTeX pretest. It will soon be available at
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20020401b.tar.gz
and on the other CTAN hosts, I hope.
Thomas
Hi,
somehow, my automake / autoconf has messed up the Makefile.in's of
texinfo and I had to update the pretest. Since a new day has just begun,
the filename now is
teTeX-src-beta-20020402.tar.gz
The file will soon appear on
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/
and the
somehow, my automake / autoconf has messed up the Makefile.in's of
texinfo and I had to update the pretest. Since a new day has just begun,
the filename now is
teTeX-src-beta-20020402.tar.gz
The file will soon appear on
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/
This seems to strip --prefix arguments away from being passed to the
subdirs. This produces warning in subdirs when looking for the texmf
tree unless the tree is installed in /usr/local/texmf.
Hm... I just recently have reactivated that prefix strip (I once
implemented it and someone else
Same here (Redhat 7.x). I guess it depends on an environment
variable TEXMFsomething being set in a system-wide profile
to work from scratch.
No, see my previous mail.
### SU: added using `kpsewhich' as last fallback before giving up; since
### xdvik is most likely to be
While this makes sense for a single driver, I don't recommend this for
complete systems like teTeX. People might be suprised if files get
installed into their old system even though a new prefix was chosen.
But wouldn't that only be for those directories where --datadir
isn't passed down
Hi,
Tomas Rokicki just has finnished an important bugfix concerning the
character shifting feature of dvips.
The bug which is not hopefully fixed is that character shifting when
activated e.g. via -G1 or -Ppdf has not checked whether the used slots
for remapping are free in the font or not.
I've been installing the teTeX beta (src: 20020402; texmf: 20020207) and my
shadow utility detected a number of files with different versions in the
texmf tree, which may be harmful in my opinion if they belong to the same
Thanks for reporting this. Most are already fixed in my tree (not yet
when compiling teTeX-src-beta-20020402 on Compaq Tru64 Unix 4.0D
with gcc 2.95.2 compilation fails on texk/web2c/omegafonts/lex.yy.c
with the error:
pl.l:314: arguments given to macro `yywrap'
The fix is to _prevent_ that /usr/bin/flex (shipped with Tru64)
which puts the macro #define
With the April 2002 snapshot, I find that if I use the --prefix=PREFIX
option, some of the subconfigures complain that they fail to find the
texmf tree even though I've put it under PREFIX/share/texmf. I must
Yes, they complain, but this is harmless.
also give --datadir=PREFIX/share. I
compiling teTeX-src-beta-20020402 with
env LDFLAGS=-L/my/path/to/libs ./configure --with-system-tifflib \
--with-system-t1lib
gmake
gives problems in the linking stage of texk/web2c/pdftex,
texk/oxdvik/oxdvi.bin and texk/xdvik/xdvi.bin since LDFLAGS is not
used there:
I
configure from teTeX-src-beta-20020402 doesn't detect an installed
tifflib (--with-system-tifflib) if libtiff has been compiled with
JPEG support and therefore depends on libjpeg.
Ok, I have fixed that. Thanks for your report.
Thomas
If I su to my home directory from root (or su to root from my home dir), then
texexec gives the error
Don't do
su userid
Better do
su - userid
That su without - just gives you a shell which initialy inheritares
environment variables from the root shell. E.g. HOME will not be set
to
what's the story behind --with-cxx-runtime-hack being a default configure
option (at least in beta-20020402)? From reading texk/web2c/configure
I see that it causes libstdc++ to be linked statically which may make sense
for a binary distribution, but IMHO not for custom installations from
Hi,
I am pleased to announce a new teTeX pretest release. Download from
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20020530.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-texmf-beta-20020530.tar.gz
Hi Reinhard,
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/dtp --with-mfw=mf make world
`mfw -ini -base=mfw -progname=mfw mf.ini' failed
Obviously the binary mfw is missing.
...
I wonder whether an interactive menue should appear during the
installation process at all.
To solve this, I suggest to run
TeX Live has:
% These are pdftex-specific.
obj_tab_size = 20 % PDF objects
dest_names_size=30 % destinations
Well, I have taken this to sync all array sizes with texlive. I don't
have taken settings for xmltex, jadetex stc. which are not part of teTeX,
however.
To solve this, I suggest to run fmtutil --all instead of
texconfig init. fmtutil will never be interactive.
It was called by make install.
Sure. My suggestion was ment to be implemented by changing Makefile.in.
It is probably sufficient to check whether there is an entry for mfw
Could you please add teTeX-src-beta-20020402-20020530.xdelta to
ftp tree?
An oversight, sorry. It is now on my server and will be mirrored to the
other sites.
Thomas
Addendum: After some more digging, the culprit has been found to
be t1lib 1.0.1, which doesn't even make an attempt at
understanding dvips-style .enc files. From t1lib/CHANGES:
Thanks for finding this.
Thomas
I don't use the beta release myself, but ca. 2 weeks ago Thomas Esser has
informed me about the structure of a very recent release, possibly the
30-5-2002 one. I have the thrown together the database halfway and can fix
something up soon for preliminary use.
That's right. The 30-5-2002
texdoc-103.dat
Description: Binary data
Thomas Anders wrote:
compiling teTeX-src-beta-20020530 on Tru64 Unix 5.0A PK3
using Compaq compilers (cc -std1) fails
While we're at it: make distclean fails with Tru64's stock
/usr/bin/make:
foo# make clean
[...]
cd ../../../libs/xpdf make clean
Make: Don't know how to make clean.
Trying to compile on Solaris/SPARC 7, under gcc-3.1,
in xdvik get:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -I../../libs/libwww -I./../../libs/libwww
-DHAVE_LIBWWW -DHAVE_WWWLIB_H -I../../libs/t1lib -I./../../libs/t1lib
-I../../libs/t1lib/../type1 -I./../../libs/t1lib/../type1 -DPS_GS
I guess xdvik should try to mimick teTeX's defaults as close as
possible (because most people installing xdvik will already have
teTeX installed).
Well, the xdvik in teTeX does not install any map or config file nor
does it install the app-default file. If you want to follow, you need
to add
but when doing
./configure --disable-a4 --prefix=/usr/local/teTeX-2.0
--disable-multiplatform
...
running `pdfetex -ini -efmt=cont-en -progname=context *cont-en.ini' ...
(/usr/local/teTeX-2.0/share/texmf/tex/context/base/math-tex.tex
! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [hash
this problem? I'd always thought that exit x should set $? to x on all
platforms.
I guess that the systems in question don't show rc=0 when executing the
following code:
/bin/sh -c trap 'echo rc=\$?; exit \$rc' 0; false; exit 0
On Linux with bash and with the /bin/sh on Sun Solaris 2.7, I
Hi,
I have uploaded a new teTeX-beta release, which will soon appear here:
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20020901.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-texmf-beta-20020901.tar.gz
Main differences from previous release:
when configured to use the Adobe Base 35 fonts updmap erroneously maps
the fonts from the phv*8an family to Helvetica-Condensed instead of
Helvetica-Narrow. I have included a patch for updmap below.
Whow! Thanks a lot for spotting this one! How silly of me to assume that
simple u - p
Hi,
I just have uploaded a new teTeX-beta release. It will soon be available
for download at:
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20020905.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-texmf-beta-20020905.tar.gz
Hi,
I just have uploaded a new teTeX-beta release, which will sonn be
available for download at:
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20020906.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-texmf-beta-20020906.tar.gz
This works. Thanks.
Good to know.
Does make -j2 work?
Yes. When compiling in texk/web2c, only one CPU will be used, however
(a .NOTPARALLEL prevents make -j2 from failing there).
Thomas
Hi Reinhard,
running make world I got the message
...
Error: `tex -ini -fmt=dklatex -progname=dklatex dklatex.ini' failed
...
The message says that I have to update my format file but what I do
not understand is why texconfig init dklatex works without any error
messages.
And the LaTeX
Dear David,
I found that the following ditty which in earlier incarnations of my
system just died almost immediately with a Segmentation Fault, will
under current 2.4 Linux kernels under, say, RedHat's (null) beta,
cause the machine to more or less freeze:
tex '\def~{\if~}~'
My system
Hi,
I just have uploaded a new teTeX-beta release:
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20020911.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-texmf-beta-20020911.tar.gz
Differences from previous release:
src tarball:
*
CTAN. It compiled here under debian Linux/Pentium II without problems.
The package does not automatically work on 64bit platforms. Anyway,
this is easy to fix using GNU autoconf. In short: I'll think about
including it, but no promisse now...
Thomas
Hi,
dante does not yet have the new files (uploaded today at about 4:20
a.m. local time). They are, however, available at the cam.ctan.org:
ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20021013.tar.gz
teTeX-src-beta-20020922
teTeX-texmf-beta-20021006
...
The following are missing from the list given in INSTALL:
cont-en
metafun
These should no longer be called directly. texexec supports them better.
The list in INSTALL is wrong and I'll fix that.
iniomega lambda mkocp mkofm odvicopy
Well, I've been trying to create PDF from a .texi document where makeinfo and
texi2html work fine. But, texi2pdf always fails. I'm attaching the document
which is part of the emacs package ESS as an example. Any help would be
appreciated. Thanks.
That seems to be an invalid texinfo
I have a metapost file that begins with %latex. I could process
this file until teTeX-beta-20021013 (web2c-7.3.8). Now I have to use
the commandline option --tex=latex. %latex is ignored and plain
TeX is used. Is this desired?
texmf.cnf now has parse_first_line = f to ensure that TeX
so its main action was texconfig init, I believe.
Ah, yes. And that calls fmtutil --all. I was not aware of the fact that
fmtutil --all tries to locate all hyphen setup files using kpsewhich.
This does not make sense and I have fixed this now in fmtutil (even
though the real bug was in
Hi,
I just have uploaded a new teTeX-beta release which will soon appear on ctan, e.g.
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20021025.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-texmf-beta-20021025.tar.gz
BTW, wouln't it be practical to have dvi files of the standard TeX
programs (Knuth's tangle, weave (webman), dvitype,...) in the
/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf/doc directory for reference?
I can recommend everyone who really wants to read the weave-output to
run pdftex instead of tex on these
Hi,
I just have uploaded a new teTeX-beta release which will soon appear on
ctan, e.g.
ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20021210.tar.gz
or
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20021210.tar.gz
This just fixes the image
Vladimir, thanks for reporting this so quickly.
Thomas
We have the following bugfix for the 20021216 pretest. I don't want to
make a new release just because of that (on the other hand, I don't want
to let you be uninformed about this bug, too). The file exists in the
texk/kpathsea directory.
Thomas
diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
--- tex-make.c 14 Dec 2002
Hi,
I just have uploaded a new teTeX-beta release which will soon appear on ctan, e.g.
ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20021216.tar.gz
or
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20021216.tar.gz
This again is another sync
Hi,
I just have uploaded a new teTeX-beta release which will soon appear on ctan, e.g.
ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20021221.tar.gz
or
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20021221.tar.gz
This again is another sync
are the xdelta files wrong, or they are correct, and you just renamed
the texms and texmfsrc tarballs after making xdeltas?
Thanks for checking. Yes, I have just renamed the two tarballs after
creating the deltas. So, this time, everything should be ok.
Thomas
Hi,
I just have uploaded a new teTeX-beta release which will soon appear on ctan, e.g.
ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-src-beta-20021225.tar.gz
ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX-beta/teTeX-texmf-beta-20021225.tar.gz
sortid.c: In function `sort_idx':
sortid.c:53: `LC_COLLATE' undeclared (first use in this function)
sortid.c:53: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
...
Willem Jan Palenstijn has found the reason for this and submitted
a patch:
From what I can tell, it's caused by checks for
I noticed that in teTeX-texmf-beta-20021225.tar.gz
bsr-interpolated.map bsr.map seemed missing.
$ tar ztvf /t/src/archiv/teTeX-texmf-beta-20021225.tar.gz '*/bsr*.map'
-rw-r--r-- te/users 6958 2002-12-25 15:05:25 ./dvips/tetex/bsr.map
-rw-r--r-- te/users 2315 2002-12-25 15:14:37
Sorry to ask this again but is there any rough
plan when teTeX 2.0 will be released?
Hopefully in some days. My plan is to wait for pdftex-1.10a and that's
not yet released.
I heard once that it would be near the end of 2002
but it is 2003 already ;)
The beginning of 2003 is near the end of
[added Tomas Rokicki to the recepients, throwing him into this
discussion]
Hi,
-o |lpr no longer works, because the default config file of dvips now
correctly sets secure mode on. Secure mode can be turned off by putting
z0 into a config file for dvips or by specifying -R0 on the commandline
I am one of tetex maintainers of Debian and we got a bug report
that please include pdftosrc in tetex-bin
I see. pdftosrc was even included in good-old-teTeX-1.0... I have
just added
@PTEX@pdftosrc = pdftosrc
...tie $(ttf2afm) $(pdftosrc) ...
to texk/web2c/Makefile.in. Seems that this is
Don't see the necessity. root filters (like in line spoolers) are
run in separate directories and with command line options specified
by the filter programmer.
Full ACK. Whoever writes such a filter should know what he is doing and
put something like an explicit -f or -o argument into the
Hi,
Karl Berry plans a new pretest of texinfo and a new release just in
time for teTeX-2.0. There will be an announce (by Karl) about that new
texinfo-pretest very soon.
If you have the possibility/time, please, test this texinfo pretest and
report any bug / problem.
Thomas
1) Would it be possible to have a configure option to use the xpdf libraries
already installed on the system? (We package them already in Fink.)
It is quite late for that request (the release is planned for this
weekend). Do you mean that you have libxpdf.a (resp. .so) and libGoo.a
(resp. so)
doing that (you might need to mark changes in some way or
rename modifies files and some files might only be distributed
together with other files)
If you find any file that violates any of these conditions, please report
that to me.
February, 2003, Thomas Esser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the licenses if you do that
If you find any file that violates any of these conditions, please report
that to me.
February, 2003, Thomas Esser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
this is the second release candidate for teTeX-2.0. I have put the files to
my server, but they'll soon be available for download at CTAN:
ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/systems/unix/teTeX/2.0/distrib/tetex-src-2.0-rc1.tar.gz
* texbook.tex / mfbook.tex removed (license, argh!)
Definitely the right thing to do. If you have found them on CTAN in a
location outside of the nonfree tree, you should notify the CTAN
maintainers: it would be definitely not nice to Addison Wesley and
Knuth to suggest by a bad
fixed the problem. I recommend upgrading all config.guess/config.sub
files in the tree.
Done, thanks.
I'm also testing on Solaris, HP-UX, IRIX, Redhat Linux, and AIX. I'm
out for the rest of the day but will continue tomorrow.
Good. omega is known to be broken due to obsolete files in the
I'm sharing format, pool and base files between a sparc64 (32-bit
userspace) box and an i386 box --- or I was; but between 20021225 and
-rc1, the byte-order independence of these files has broken, even
without NO_DUMP_SHARE; all .base, .fmt. .efmt and .mem files differ
between those platforms
fun!
Thomas Esser, February 2003
Bob Tennent notified by, that updmap (in teTeX-2.0) generates wrong
output for the map files of cm-super for dvipdfm. The following patch
should fix this (and other cases where the name of the .enc file contains
characters other than [A-Za-z0-9]).
Thomas
--- updmap-2.0 Sat Feb 1 18:57:18 2003
and changing this to:
parse_first_line = t
would make things work again.
Sure, but I suggest to give the user a real TeX by default. If he
wants to change this default, that's his decision...
Further, he advised to add to the beginning of /usr/bin/makempx
parse_first_line=t
--- texk/etc/autoconf/acspecific.m4.orig Mon Feb 3 18:47:42 2003
+++ texk/etc/autoconf/acspecific.m4 Mon Feb 3 18:48:02 2003
@@ -1754,7 +1754,7 @@
#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H
#include sys/socket.h
#endif
-extern select
texconfig should no longer try to call fmtutil --byfmt mfw. Doing
so gives
fmtutil: no info for format `mfw'
(but does not cause any harm).
The following patch fixes this.
Thomas
--- 2.0.2/texk/tetex/texconfig Sat Mar 1 10:13:18 2003
+++ texk/tetex/texconfigSat Mar 1 16:05:23 2003
94 matches
Mail list logo
