Hi, Matthias--
You wrote
>...
> So do I get you right that Ae does not only make the space between the
> systems equal, but also tries to spread the systems equally over the page,
> i.e. tries to fill the whole page (if some threshold, how full the page
has to
> be, is passed)?
No, not exactly.
Dear Don,
"Don Simons" wrote:
>I think our wires got crossed. You seem to be referring to your 2nd posting on
>4/29,
>which did have an example with 3 systems, and which seems to correspond to
>one of the two pdf's you just posted . However, I had not analyzed that one at
>all,
>but rather was
"Matthias Holländer" wrote
>
> Dear Don,
>
> I really didn't mean to offend you or get you upset, if that was the case I
> firmly beg your pardon.
Absolutely no offense taken. It ALWAYS makes me happy to see new evidence of
anyone using PMX.
> I only wanted to make clear what I mean. And
TL;DR: The last emails actually answered my core questions and solved all my
problems with that topic. Thank You all.
Dear Don,
I really didn't mean to offend you or get you upset, if that was the case I
firmly beg your pardon. I only wanted to make clear what I mean. And you're
right, I
2018-04-30 6:54 GMT+02:00 Don Simons :
> "Matthias Holländer" wrote
>> So here comes the "two pieces of music in one document" thing.
>>...
>> With the help of Andres code -- thank you for that -- I can, in my view,
>> significantly improve the procedure to:
>>
>>
Whenever a PMX/TeX issue crops up on the list, it seldom seems to be
an M-Tx issue too :-) because M-Tx has its own mtx.tex file for inline
TeX. There is nothing mystical and "M-Tx only" about mtx.tex. It's
just a collection of macros useful when one is coding in PMX. Some of
them I borrowed from
"Matthias Holländer" wrote
> So here comes the "two pieces of music in one document" thing.
>...
> With the help of Andres code -- thank you for that -- I can, in my view,
> significantly improve the procedure to:
>
> ==
>...
>
"Matthias Holländer" wrote
>...
> Quoting Don:
> >I can help you most effectively if you could provide a .pmx file that is as
> close to as possible to what you finally want, and then clearly explain what
> you’d >like to change from that.
> I will try to explain myself better. I wanted to know,
d4 b4 ) a4 /
>
>% Bar 6
>e43 a42 c4 d4 d4 oc c4 /
>( g44 a4 ) e44 g4 f4 oc e4 /
>
>% Bar 7
>b22 d4 e4 b42 c4 /
>( d44 e4 ) f4 ( g4 b4 ) a4 /
>
>% Ending bar
>m5400
>c43 a4 d4 g22 /
>( e44 g4 ) f4 g2 /
>
>L4M+16
>%K+0+2
>m6464
>\\\def\titel{L
4 /
a24 g4 f2 oc d4 /
% Bar 5
g23 g4 d2 d4 /
( b44 c4 ) b4 ( d4 b4 ) a4 /
% Bar 6
e43 a42 c4 d4 d4 oc c4 /
( g44 a4 ) e44 g4 f4 oc e4 /
==
Andre
From: "Matthias Holländer"
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2018 1:31 PM
To: tex-music@tug.org
Subject: [Tex-music] Varying the vertica
Dear all!
When using the Ae option for making vertical inter-sytem space equal between all systems in PMX, is there a possibility to scale this vertical space still globally? I wanted to get two pieces of music on the same A4 page and therefore wanted to reduce the space, determined by Ae, a
11 matches
Mail list logo