Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-09 Thread Rajaram Krishnamurthy
nation which LKG may not >>> understand; here is stand ; so use those malayalam words for yourself, >>> instead of mad dog sentences as if trying to become smart; in that time you >>> can read and vet your Q and A. KR NB try to understand the inner meaning

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-09 Thread Rajaram Krishnamurthy
d of mad dog sentences as if trying to become smart; in that time you > can read and vet your Q and A. KR NB try to understand the inner meaning > than word watching without your sense > > -- Forwarded message - > From: *gopala krishnan* > Date: Wed, 8 May 20

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-09 Thread 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty
: Wed, 8 May 2024 at 09:16 Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg To: keralaiy...@googlegroups.com , Narayanaswamy Iyer , Iyer , Patty Thatha , Rajaram Krishnamurthy Mr Rajaram, I pointed out your reaction, by missing words in your response. You don't recco

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-08 Thread Rajaram Krishnamurthy
tead of mad dog sentences as if trying to become smart; in that time you > can read and vet your Q and A. KR NB try to understand the inner meaning > than word watching without your sense > > -- Forwarded message - > From: *gopala krishnan* > Date: Wed,

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-08 Thread 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty
2024 at 09:16 Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg To: keralaiy...@googlegroups.com , Narayanaswamy Iyer , Iyer , Patty Thatha , Rajaram Krishnamurthy Mr Rajaram, I pointed out your reaction, by missing words in your response. You don't recco

Fwd: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-08 Thread Rajaram Krishnamurthy
3] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg To: keralaiy...@googlegroups.com , Narayanaswamy Iyer , Iyer , Patty Thatha , Rajaram Krishnamurthy < keyarinc...@gmail.com> Mr Rajaram, I pointed out your reaction, by missing words in your response. You don't reccognize it . There is a Malayalam sa

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-08 Thread 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty
May, 2024 at 06:41:00 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy wrote: Has he gone Mad ? Really I think -Qand A  Can you tell a mad joke?    -- Forwarded message - From: gopala krishnan Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:29 Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg T

Fwd: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-08 Thread Rajaram Krishnamurthy
Has he gone Mad ? Really I think -Qand A Can you tell a mad joke? -- Forwarded message - From: gopala krishnan Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 at 23:29 Subject: Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg To: Rajaram Krishnamurthy , Patty Thatha < thatha_patty@googlegroups.

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-07 Thread 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty
Truth is bitter Mr Rajaram ; You are one among the Brahmins who downtrodden the Brahmin varna without substance , because of your  interpretations without proper knowledge  Gopalakrishnan On Wednesday, 8 May, 2024 at 08:01:24 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy wrote: Truth is bitter

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-07 Thread 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty
Mr Rajaram, In your reaction you wrote- not reading in between lines, perhaps you meant reading in between lines. In your reaction you wrote-"If you are not a learned to under that only you" perhaps you meant understand and not under. You have used Brahmin tribe in your posting at many

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-07 Thread Rajaram Krishnamurthy
I know your lack of knowledge, not reading in between the lines, when someone writes, and hasty generalisation alone place you in misery; as long as you are controlled by that Singapore Butler and canteen server your resurrection is impossible. I have written clearly " *Only people like your tribe

Re: [iyer123] Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-07 Thread 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty
Sir, You have not still pointed out his statement- Brahmin tribe.  There is difference between caste and tribe.  I have never read in any book a Brahmin, Kshathriya, Vaisya or Soodra is included in  TRIBE. They are included under castes. Probably in Mr Rajaram's Lexicon it may be so. Only

Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-07 Thread 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty
Mr Rajaram, Very good. You were cutting the  tree from the wrong side. When I pointed it out, now you have thrown the axe itself on me. But by my timely movement, axe has fallen on the ground and least harmed me. But Mr Rajaram, like you I will not take the axe and throw at you. I know it will

Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-07 Thread Rajaram Krishnamurthy
Aha your calling uncivilised is in order dragging all into and I am hitting you is anger No Sir I am asking what right you have to write nonsense? It is not anger. Anger springs only from your side without content. I also replied to you on dot. If you were to act on one point conveniently then I

Re: [KeralaIyers] Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-07 Thread 'gopala krishnan' via Thatha_Patty
Mr Rajaram, My response is not PROVOCATIVE. Don't react, be calm and respond. Read what I wrote with a calm mind. You will understand what I wrote. When you post some thing every member can respond. I don't understand the reason for your anger. Yes , being a former Government servant in IRS

Re: age at marriage-reg

2024-05-07 Thread Rajaram Krishnamurthy
Who are you? Who are you to tell? Who are you to tell in a manner?; and who are you to tell someone in an uncivilised manner as interpreted in your lexicon, as a civilised manner? You wrote elsewhere "I am afro sri vatsa Gotra and aprvaras; what was that?; age old books is it not?; Only people