On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 11:32:00AM +0200, Martin Sluka via Therion wrote:
> 8. 4. 2017 v 10:46, Bruce Mutton via Therion :
> > Both options feel a little bit like hacks.
>
> Nosurvey is nosurvey.
The thbook defers to the Survex manual for the definitions of the data
styles ("See Survex manual for
> I think nosurvey will be the best compromise (when I can get the nosurveys
to stop crashing the extended elevations).
I fixed the crash, and got the extended elevation to work, as per the image
below.
Also figured out that if the nosurvey leg is not in any maps that are
selected for export,
Martin
I think nosurvey will be the best compromise (when I can get the nosurveys
to stop crashing the extended elevations).
I can set it to approximate and duplicate, so that is shows up yellow and
dashed with my metapost customisation.
However
> nosurvey is nosurvey.
True, in the la
> 8. 4. 2017 v 10:46, Bruce Mutton via Therion :
>
> Both options feel a little bit like hacks.
Nosurvey is nosurvey.
m.s.___
Therion mailing list
Therion@speleo.sk
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
: Saturday, 8 April 2017 7:31 PM
To: List for Therion users
Cc: Martin Sluka
Subject: Re: [Therion] Disconnected centrelines - Extended Elevation Control
8. 4. 2017 v 0:51, Bruce Mutton via Therion mailto:therion@speleo.sk> >:
and think I understand extend start, ignore, hide
> 8. 4. 2017 v 0:51, Bruce Mutton via Therion :
>
> and think I understand extend start, ignore, hide
Bruce, have you try to create a nosurvey shot? Just between two stations you
want to be in correct places?
m.s.___
Therion mailing list
Therion@spe
I had this problem for two pits not connected and i resolve it by using a
surface suvey
Guy
De : Bruce Mutton via Therion
Envoyé le :samedi 8 avril 2017 00:52
À : 'List for Therion users'
Cc : Bruce Mutton
Objet :[Therion] Disconnected centrelines - Extended Elevation Control
I am b
