Re: [tw5] Re: Best approach for multiple wikis

In this particular case, the file on disk is 6 hours newer than the copy the browser downloaded. I have not used this feature of TiddlyServer much so perhaps I should take a look at it again, but nothing changed since I made it that I know of. I did run into a scenario where the etag was changing

Re: [tw5] Re: Best approach for multiple wikis

You can set "_datafoldertarget": "../some/path" in settings.json to any TiddlyWiki folder you want. Relative paths are relative to the settings.json file. You can see it in the example in https://arlen22.github.io/tiddlyserver/docs/serverconfig.html although I don't mention it anywhere on that

Re: [tw5] Re: Best approach for multiple wikis

> what should be in folders for example personal folder! > It does not seem TiddlyServer create a wiki there > > --Mohammad > > On Tuesday, December 3, 2019 at 11:30:43 PM UTC+3:30, Arlen Beiler wrote: >> >> Just thought I'd take a minute to chime in here. I made Tid

Re: [tw5] Re: Best approach for multiple wikis

Just thought I'd take a minute to chime in here. I made TiddlyServer to solve my own problem of Massive Multi-file Online wikis. It serves the folders you specify in a sort of tree allowing them to be grouped together and easily navigated with the built-in directory index (even the virtual

Re: [tw5] Re: Taking Node Server to the next level

And here's the link for it: https://github.com/Arlen22/TW5-storage-plugin On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:49 PM Arlen Beiler wrote: > Well, Jed's adapter and everyone's thoughts so far inspired me to do a > little exploring and I managed to put this little proof of concept > together. It tur

Re: [tw5] Re: Taking Node Server to the next level

folder (the folder containing tiddlywiki.js). The readme has rather simple instructions and the npm install command that needs to be run. On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 10:38 AM Arlen Beiler wrote: > I think in this case I'm rather aiming to build something new on top of > TiddlyWiki5. I may revisit th

Re: [tw5] Re: Taking Node Server to the next level

I think in this case I'm rather aiming to build something new on top of TiddlyWiki5. I may revisit the rest of the TiddlyWeb protocol at a later time and take some ideas from it. However, I think that to build something new it would need to be built using TiddlyWiki5 from the ground up, whereas

Re: [tw5] Re: Taking Node Server to the next level

PouchDB is a very good first step because of the way it is setup. SQLite would also be a great first step for targeting SQL databases. On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 9:30 PM TonyM wrote: > Jed, > > Great work, what a Wiz. I will have a closer look. With the pouchDB have > any more persistence that

Re: [tw5] Re: Taking Node Server to the next level

Most Node solutions that I am aware of are either request-based (AWS Lambda and Cloudfront Workers), or VM based. There's also Heroku, but it doesn't allow a persistent file system. However, the data storage structure is a more serious bottleneck for innovation, I believe, and once we have a

Re: [tw5] Re: Taking Node Server to the next level

I'm kind of thinking that if the user is setting up MySQL themselves, then they have control of the server and might as well be setting up TiddlyServer or Bob anyway, unless MySQL is up their alley, in which case it's no big deal. On the flip side, using PouchDB or SQLite instead of the file

[tw5] Taking Node Server to the next level

I have a radical proposal which would take data folders to the next level. What if instead of the file system adapter we would write a new adapter to use a database. We could use PouchDB, but I would vote for something much more widespread like SQLite. We could also write it in a generic way that

Re: [tw5] Re: Single File vs Node.js

The only problem you will run into is relative links. In single file wikis served as a file, your relative links will be to folders beside the FILE. When you move to the server, your relative links will be broken, because your relative links will be to folders beside the FOLDER. The best way to

Re: [tw5] Tiddly Wiki HTML Page in Server

The node server has an option to serve a page without the tiddler body included in the first request. The client then downloads each tiddler the first time it is used. This would be a lot better option. I don’t know the exact steps, but it works well. On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 06:36 TonyM wrote:

Re: [tw5] Re: The penultimate words on saving - multi access and multi user

> I thought you already had had "*The last word in Saving?*" So I will take your "*penultimate*" as evidence you have time travel :-) You have made me seriously question my understanding of EVERY use of this word I have ever seen! Google: define penultimate. last but one in a series of things;

Re: [tw5] Re: The last word in Saving?

or if you don't > want to manage servers and so forth. If you use more than 1 device > regularly though, I would think you'd want some form of syncing between > them and that's why 6. would be beneficial, even if you connect to the > cloud, where someone else runs a variation on 1., 2., 3. for

Re: [tw5] Re: The last word in Saving?

Just realized that’s worded badly. You definitely have your bases covered. On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 16:28 Arlen Beiler wrote: > I have not followed your work, unfortunately, but it sounds like you and I > are on the same page then. I was only referring to a way I thought of > yesterda

Re: [tw5] Re: The last word in Saving?

I have not followed your work, unfortunately, but it sounds like you and I are on the same page then. I was only referring to a way I thought of yesterday to make it pretty much bulletproof using a browser plugin, but it sounds like I would have done it exactly as you did for a TiddlyWiki plug-in

Re: [tw5] Re: The last word in Saving?

I think the bob saver can be expanded to use a browser plugin. This can address some of the security concerns with having a freely available saver listening on the network. And it’s also simply installable as you say. I must have heard enough complaints about corporate networks that I thought

Re: [tw5] Re: The last word in Saving?

Can we somehow pin this? On Wed, Nov 20, 2019, 20:26 TonyM wrote: > The *First Save* idea > > I am wondering if installing the local storage and rather than provide a > download you tiddlywiki we just provide a save your changes button, a > backup of changes only that can be restored if the

Re: [tw5] Re: The last word in Saving?

Actually, I just looked it up, and you're right, it is quite similar. The difference in my scenario is it installs the plug-in in the browser instead of the wiki. I will definitely look into this more. On Wed, Nov 20, 2019, 20:13 Arlen Beiler wrote: > There are different scenarios be

Re: [tw5] Re: The last word in Saving?

There are different scenarios being considered here. TiddlyServer already does what you mentioned, however there are some more advanced options we could implement. What I'm referring to is that file:// urls can be saved back to the filesystem via TiddlyFox calling Extension calling a Save Handler

Re: [tw5] Re: The last word in Saving?

omeone will > have to maintain an extension on Edge, FF, and Chrome -- a constantly > changing target. > > Perhaps you should put together an estimate of how much work / money it > would take to make an all-in-one single file solution. > > > > On Wednesday, November 20,

Re: [tw5] Re: TW too slow to use at only 8 MB

Definitely upgrade -- alot of improvements have been made recently. Also, the tag filter starts having performance problems when you start getting into tens of thousands of tiddlers (like a dictionary). It's a known bug and we're working on a solution. You can turn on performance instrumentation

Re: [tw5] Re: [TW5] Wiki opens to blank screen

Press F12 and see if any errors are in the console. Since the file size is almost the same size, try opening it in a text editor and make sure it ends with or something like that. On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 5:28 AM Jon wrote: > Hi, > > there isn't actually anything to interact with - just a

[tw5] TiddlyServer create directory security bug

Hi Everyone, I've fixed it in master and I'll publish a fix tomorrow, but I just realized that the create directory function in the directory index page does not check the folder name before creating it, which means that any relative path will create a folder as long as it doesn't exist. So it's

Re: [tw5] Re: TiddlyServer upgraded to TiddlyWiki 5.1.21

I've add some JSON snippets to https://arlen22.github.io/tiddlyserver/docs/serverconfig.html to hopefully make it more clear what the entire configuration looks like. On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 9:45 AM Arlen Beiler wrote: > Mime types can now be added by specifying them under { "direct

Re: [tw5] Re: TiddlyServer upgraded to TiddlyWiki 5.1.21

Mime types can now be added by specifying them under { "directoryIndex: { mimetypes: { "text/html": ["tw"] } } } On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 9:42 AM Arlen Beiler wrote: > export interface ServerConfig_TiddlyServer { > /** > >* Backup folder to store backups

Re: [tw5] Re: TiddlyServer upgraded to TiddlyWiki 5.1.21

Age option, as the saving mechanism will still * send etags back to the browser, regardless of this option. */ etag?: "required" | "disabled" | "optional" } On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 9:40 AM Arlen Beiler wrote: > The description on etagAge is not correct. It has

Re: [tw5] Re: TiddlyServer upgraded to TiddlyWiki 5.1.21

The description on etagAge is not correct. It has nothing to do with backups. I'm not sure why I wrote that, but backups are always saved no matter what. I must have been tired that day! On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 9:37 AM Arlen Beiler wrote: > Here is the TypeScript interface for the putsa

Re: [tw5] Re: TiddlyServer upgraded to TiddlyWiki 5.1.21

;> "etagWindow": 10, >> "etag": "", >> "_disableLocalHost": "true", >> "useTW5path" : false >> >> Have these being deprecated? >> >> I believe I will still need >> &

[tw5] TiddlyServer upgraded to TiddlyWiki 5.1.21

Hi everyone, I've upgraded TiddlyServer to TW5.1.21. This release also adds /assets/tiddlywiki which serves the tiddlywiki folder the server is using to mount data folders. It's mainly for convenience, but it has some really great use-cases such as loading plugins as external javascript instead

[tw5] Production bundles for the web

Hello everyone, As some of you know, TiddlyServer uses a "bundled" version of TiddlyWiki intended to improve startup times and reduce file count. I've finally gotten my build script to the point that I am confident that it works right and I've uploaded the bundles to GitHub in two formats -- the

Re: [tw5] TiddlyChrome is back

TiddlyChrome is a chrome extension/app that will open a TiddlyWiki file and then allow you to edit it like you used to be able to with TiddlyFox. When you open the app it pops up a dialog box asking which file you want to open, and then once you select it it is able to edit that file directly. On

[tw5] TiddlyChrome is back

Hi Everyone, as some of you know, TiddlyChrome has been broken for a while. Well, now I think I've fixed it. I could find my old key, so I generated a new one, which means you have to uninstall the old TiddlyChrome before installing the new one to prevent confusion.

Re: [tw5] Re: Hitting a barrier at 36,000 tiddlers

When I step over the line it takes six seconds to show up for the next line. However, when I run a performance profile of the page and do exactly one action -- opening the control panel -- it still takes about 6 seconds but the performance profile shows thousands of refresh calls down the widget

Re: [tw5] Re: Hitting a barrier at 36,000 tiddlers

After stepping through conditional breakpoints and other things, the tag operator is indeed the result of the massive slowdown. [image: Screenshot 2019-09-25 13.46.38.png] The first line takes a long time to return, about 3 seconds per invocation. The rest of it is fairly quick. There is a

Re: [tw5] Re: What's the point of effort?

Josiah, Do you want to use the wiki on https://github.com/Arlen22/TiddlyWiki-DocsWiki/wiki? You're welcome to it. I have it set open so anyone can edit it and if that creates too many problems or we start dealing with trolls from outside, we can either close it or I can add some of you as

Re: [tw5] Re: Discussion: Advantages and disadvantages of an own TiddlyWiki, i.e. TW StackExchange site for documentation of questions and solutions (not discussions!)

That being said, almost all questions are at home on StackOverflow. Just us the tiddlywiki5 tag. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tiddlywiki5 On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:30 AM @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > Actually Arlen tried to get a StackExchange thing going some time ago... >

Re: [tw5] Re: A TiddlyWiki community book.

As an experiment, I created a new repository and opened the wiki for anyone to edit. https://github.com/Arlen22/TiddlyWiki-DocsWiki/wiki Feel free to edit, everyone. Maybe this will give us a good way to stay organized. On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 9:09 AM Arlen Beiler wrote: > For a centrali

Re: [tw5] Re: A TiddlyWiki community book.

For a centralized, collaborative wiki, I've started https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/TiddlyWiki_Manual. Please feel free to contribute to it as you like. It is quite scattered as well, since almost nothing has been done with it. I would be completely open to other alternatives, but I feel like

Re: [tw5] Re: Arlen Good igea for Gzipping $:/core

The NodeJS server version does indeed serve the index gzipped. My focus is more on single-file wikis, however. On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:45 PM Matt DeMoss wrote: > I already see > content-encoding: > gzip > on the initial response from my setup (2.6MB and 636KB transferred). It > could be the

Re: [tw5] Re: Arlen Good igea for Gzipping $:/core

I don't think Gzip would have a hangup with it, in fact, I'm pretty sure it would save on compression time. But I don't know that for sure. A lot of websites don't use compression, however, so I think it would still be a big bonus. On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 3:38 PM Lost Admin wrote: > I had to

Re: [tw5] Re: Arlen Good igea for Gzipping $:/core

This idea has nothing to do with empty.html itself, it really applies to all single-file wikis. All wikis could benefit from this because the core tiddler is exactly the same in all wikis for each version, no matter which other plugins are added. The core is just another plugin, that's all.

Re: [tw5] Re: Coming in v5.1.22: dynamic loading of plugins

Unfortunately I don't think it would be possible for a LocalStorage plugin to not use Javascript. However, it could be possible to make a Chrome extension that would load this functionality for all wikis if the user desired to install such an extension. It would also be possible to enable this

Re: [tw5] Re: Announcing TiddlyServer 2.1 Stable

Actually there is an easier way than replacing the folder. Just set _datafoldertarget property in settings.json to whatever folder you want to use. The plugins are bundled so they load faster. It doesn't matter, TiddlyWiki just loads them either way. On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 5:16 AM mauloop

Re: [tw5] Re: Re-installing TiddlyWiki

f I want to load them through > TiddlyServer? > > I am sure you have already given answer to all these questions, but as a > newbie I wish to follow up the instruction and be able to setup > TiddlyServer + working Wikis. > > > > > Best wishes > Mohammad > &g

Re: [tw5] Re: Losing Multiple Versions On Server Restart - node.js

Nothing happens on server shutdown. You should be able to kill it without losing anything as long as the Node process has finished writing to disk, which is normally instantaneous. On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 1:29 PM Arlen Beiler wrote: > A few questions. > > In your wiki, open cont

Re: [tw5] Re: Losing Multiple Versions On Server Restart - node.js

A few questions. In your wiki, open control panel, then go to the plugins tab. Please tells us which plugins are enabled. Several of us work with the TiddlyWiki core code so we know which plugins should be enabled in this situation and which might cause conflicts. Enable logging like Jeremy

Re: [tw5] Re: Re-installing TiddlyWiki

Just thought I'd take a minute to chime in here. I apologize that TiddlyServer appears so complex to get started with. I'm quite sure it is much simpler than the other options you've mentioned above, especially IIS and WebDAV. So here's how to get started.

Re: [tw5] Re: Announcing TiddlyServer 2.1 Stable

Maybe just making a sample file with lots of different possibilities > commented out would help. > > I think TS is great, but it really needs some specifics to help people. > > Thanks! > Mark > > On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 2:47:01 PM UTC-7, Arlen Beiler wrote: &g

Re: [tw5] Re: Announcing TiddlyServer 2.1 Stable

y > > > On Thursday, 5 September 2019 07:47:01 UTC+10, Arlen Beiler wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, TiddlyServer 2.1 is finally here. I believe it's stable >> and I've gotten most of the bugs worked out. I specifically tested >> single-file saving (which I've gotten a lot

[tw5] Announcing TiddlyServer 2.1 Stable

Hello everyone, TiddlyServer 2.1 is finally here. I believe it's stable and I've gotten most of the bugs worked out. I specifically tested single-file saving (which I've gotten a lot of bug reports about lately) and I'm pleased to say that is working as well. Please continue making suggestions. I

Re: [tw5] Re: TiddlyServer 2.1.2 beta

You can also just create a new settings.json file using example-settings.json and then copy the tree over from your old file. On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:19 PM Arlen Beiler wrote: > Yes, you can just copy settings.json over and if it doesn't complain then > you're good. > Yes, d

Re: [tw5] Re: TiddlyServer 2.1.2 beta

Yes, you can just copy settings.json over and if it doesn't complain then you're good. Yes, datafolder-template.json is a tiddlywiki.info template. It is the tiddlywiki.info file from the server edition and is used when you create a data folder from a directory index page. Yes, TiddlyServer 2.1 is

[tw5] TiddlyServer 2.1.2 beta

I've gotten another round of updates made to TiddlyServer. The old tree format is back so an object works as a group and a string works as a folder. If an object contains only folders or the more advanced group element format which provides a key property for the group, you can use an array

Re: [tw5] Re: Update to TiddlyServer 2.1 Beta

you have been for now and let me know if anything breaks. I'll add the basic auth back in for now. I'll let you know when I do that. On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:16 AM Arlen Beiler wrote: > The static tiddlers are still experimental and the path may change in > 5.1.20. TiddlyServer keeps it

Re: [tw5] Re: Update to TiddlyServer 2.1 Beta

that. It takes the default port 80 and > does not interfere with any other server on my computer. > > Thanks heaps > Tony > > Regards > Tony > > On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 7:30:51 AM UTC+10, Arlen Beiler wrote: >> >> Thank you. Keep the feedback and

Re: [tw5] How http://do/I/access/_THISPART_ ?

If you need to read the location hash for Javascript purposes, you could use a raw head tiddler with a script tag to save it in a global variable. Or put it in a tiddler in the preload array. On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:37 PM Mat wrote: > Then I know. Much appreciated that you replied. > > <:-) >

Re: [tw5] Re: Update to TiddlyServer 2.1 Beta

very similar to > 2.0.14. > > There's a visual distraction problem where missing branches have no icon. > See image below. > > Thanks! > > > > On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 1:41:47 PM UTC-7, Arlen Beiler wrote: >> >> And then I forgot to push the last bit. So

[tw5] Re: Update to TiddlyServer 2.1 Beta

And then I forgot to push the last bit. So here's the updated link. https://github.com/Arlen22/TiddlyServer/tree/02b47908381a987411ec2fdf1c8d4f0e64055bd4 Enjoy! Arlen On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:39 PM Arlen Beiler wrote: > Hi TiddlyServer testers, > > > https://github.com/Arlen22/

[tw5] Update to TiddlyServer 2.1 Beta

Hi TiddlyServer testers, https://github.com/Arlen22/TiddlyServer/tree/324342c58882b994b98365a6e34515b779f6e07d Here is an update to TiddlyServer 2.1 Beta. The simplified tree format from 2.0 is back, but the expanded format is available. A string represents a folder element and an object with no

[tw5] I'm still here, and so is TiddlyServer

Hi everyone, just wanted to let you know I haven't disappeared. I'm taking a few weeks break as I've inserted myself back into America, but I plan to wrap up the TiddlyServer 2.1 update, doing my best to make sure it works flawlessly. I'll be deferring some of the more ambitious features, such as

Re: [tw5] [Sharing] Local desktop server to LAN server TiddlyServer, Node or Bob (Windows?)

Just thought I would mention (since it appears that you're using TiddlyServer) that TiddlyServer was created to do away with this exact scenario. Specifically, data folders may be arranged in folders, and TiddlyServer is then configured to serve the entire folder. When a data folder is loaded,

Re: [tw5] Re: Paragraph tags in layout

Ok, they should be working now. On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 09:08 PMario wrote: > Hi Arlen, > None of the links work for me. using FF latest. > -m > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [tw5] Re: Paragraph tags in layout

Ok, fixed it. It should work now. Sorry for the trouble. https://arlen22.github.io/tiddlywiki-auto-paragraph.html On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 9:08 AM PMario wrote: > Hi Arlen, > None of the links work for me. using FF latest. > -m > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [tw5] Re: Paragraph tags in layout

://arlen22.github.io/tiddlywiki-auto-paragraph.html Arlen On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:55 PM Arlen Beiler wrote: > It turns out that the fix requires only six lines of code! > > Well, OK, six lines spread across six files. It's pretty obvious that all > user-generated content is insi

Re: [tw5] Re: Paragraph tags in layout

It turns out that the fix requires only six lines of code! Well, OK, six lines spread across six files. It's pretty obvious that all user-generated content is inside a tiddler body in the story river, so we just turn on auto-generated paragraphs inside the tiddler body in the story river (and in

[tw5] Paragraph tags in layout

Hi Everyone, I'm running into a puzzling problem and am curious if someone could explain it to me. I'm trying to change the layout of the TiddlyWiki UI using CSS but I keep running into p tags at random places that completely break the proper flow of the layout. I can't figure out what's causing

[tw5] Macro parameters may contain variable substitutions

I just discovered something that I think is undocumented but could be extremely useful! When arguments are passed to the macrocall widget, it first processes the param substitutions of the macro, AND THEN processes the variable substitutions. This means that you can pass in a variable substitution

Re: [tw5] Re: A man went into the Foo Bar ... (humour)

He went into the foo bar and ordered a foo baz. On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:44 PM @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > LOL Thomas & S. S ... :-) > > I went into the Foo Bar and all the barman ever said was "HELLO WORLD!" > > All I wanted was a lager. > > Josiah > > S. S. wrote: >> >> And after a foo too many

Re: [tw5] Sidebar tc-reveal breaks theme hierarchy

There are many places where tc-reveal inside a list breaks customizing the individual items in the list. But as far as I can think, this is the only place where it matters, because most other lists are used in places where all items are styled the same. On Wed, Feb 6, 2019, 00:07 Jeremy Ruston

[tw5] Sidebar tc-reveal breaks theme hierarchy

In trying to modify the theme of the sidebar, I discovered that the reveal widget makes it impossible to reposition the sidebar elements because they do not have the appropriate classes. [image: image.png] I am wondering if it would be possible to change the sidebar tiddler to allow the

[tw5] How to use the a field in a widget call inside a list

>From the sidebar tiddler <$reveal type="nomatch" state=<> class= *{{<>!!containerClass}}* text="hide" tag="div"> Adding this doesn't seem to work. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [tw5] Re: Programmatically add tiddlers to running TW instance (node)

is reload from inside the wiki to which it applies, > an action tiddler to close all, save then reload would be a good safety > would it not? > > Tony > > On Friday, January 25, 2019 at 3:08:32 PM UTC+11, Arlen Beiler wrote: >> >> TiddlyServer just uses TiddlyWiki unde

Re: [tw5] Re: Programmatically add tiddlers to running TW instance (node)

TiddlyServer just uses TiddlyWiki under the hood, but if you add "?restart=true" to the data folder path, it will immediately reload the data folder instance from disk. So if you're accessing your data folder at http://localhost/mydatafolder/ you would change that to

Re: [tw5] Re: [TS] TiddlyServer upgraded to TiddlyWiki 5.1.17!

> folders, and, if so, where should the files go? > > Thanks! > -- Mark > > On Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 7:54:37 PM UTC-7, Arlen Beiler wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> I've upgraded TiddlyServer to TiddlyWiki 5.1.17. >> >> I've also implemented the

[tw5] Proposal: "Plugin per file" should be used more

I would like to mention to everyone that there is a feature in the boot code which is often overlooked but is very useful. And that is that you can distribute a plugin as a single JSON file. This has a massive advantage when we're looking at hosting wikis online because these could be compiled and

Re: [tw5] Re: Main problem of TiddlyWiki site - is bad Google indexation.

Having the static landing pages is an awesome idea if TiddlyWiki doesn't play well with Google, because it has the added benefit of being able to async'ly load the core javascript (if served as a separate file) putting it in the browser cache before the user gets to the page where it's needed

Re: [tw5] Publicly hosting a read-only tiddlywiki where tiddlers are served individually?

If your site is mostly static, then use individual static HTML files exported using the examples on TiddlyWiki.com. If it is mostly interactive, or has a lot of cross-reference links that would benefit from a story river, then use the single file approach and insert pictures as relative links

[tw5] Some Christmas stats and my current situation

Hi Everyone, I thought I would list a few interesting tidbits from my various projects. On Christmas Day, TW Cloud Connector for Dropbox had 1761 users on full Dropbox access and 1466 users on apps folder access (remember that there is probably significant overlap between the two). Full access

Re: [tw5] Re: TW5 vs Dokuwiki

I'll second this. I think it would be useful to have some type of information on the headings in a tiddler. On Thu, Dec 20, 2018, 13:32 TonyM Rahul, > > I belive tiddlywiki can do anything you want. Search tiddlywiki.com for > toc and read what you find. Perhaps the toc tabbed internal is

Re: [tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki On A Stick (particularly for iOS)

What I think you should do is host it on the network then access it from your iOS device. You could setup a secure VPN solution that would allow them to connect to the home network remotely. Or you could just have it sync changes once they get back home. I really think that would be a lot easier

Re: [tw5] Re: Alternative to Google Groups suggestion

> we NEED more people (activists) to even begin to make something of places > like stackoverflow. > > Best wishes > Josiah > > Arlen Beiler wrote: >> >> If we are going to do that, we should really just dust off >> stackoverflow.com. Most of the wikitext

Re: [tw5] Re: Alternative to Google Groups suggestion

If we are going to do that, we should really just dust off stackoverflow.com. Most of the wikitext and javascript related questions could easily be moved there. More community-related questions such as suggestions and philosophical think-tank type discussions would continue to happen here. So

Re: [tw5] Re: Alternative to Google Groups suggestion

I think the fact that a lot of groups are moving to it is partly an indication that it will stay around for a while. As far as the pricing, I thought that was just for attachments, but that is a valid concern. Google Groups is free, but Google just announced they are going to close Google Plus,

[tw5] Alternative to Google Groups suggestion

I was about to forward this to Jeremy and then remembered that last time I emailed him directly he gave me his thoughts and then said I should post it on the group so we can hear everyone's thoughts. I'm pretty sure he would say that this time too. So here it is. Another software community much

Re: [tw5] Re: sending email from a tiddler

Also check out this post on stack overflow which specifically addresses Gmail. https://stackoverflow.com/q/2583928/258482 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: [tw5] Node.js TW not responding to HTTP requests in AWS EC2

That was my first suspicion. I believe you can specify which IP address to use in the command line. On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:21 PM Andrés Pérez wrote: > So a netstat -an shows that the server is only listening for traffic on > localhost > tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:8080 0.0.0.0:*

Re: [tw5] Re: Tiddlywiki on Hackernews

One thing we should add is a notebook theme or plugin that would convert the layout to more of a OneNote/Evernote layout where you can access your notebooks and notes on the left side, and edit them on the right. The sidebar should be moved to either the top right or bottom left and made

[tw5] Loading data folders directly into the browser (skipping the server)

Hello all, I need your input here. Is there any concievable situation in which it matters whether someone loads a datafolder directly into the browser from the file system? Yes, I actually have a real world use for this, and it might surprise you a little. But first I have to know under what

Re: [tw5] Re: [NodeJS][Android] TiddlyWiki takes 30 seconds to load modules in ARM architecture

You definitely don't have to compile stuff. You just need to do a little configuring of apps, but now that I discovered Dory, the need for that has gone down. Sometime soon I will write an app to generate the configuraton automatically. If you want to contribute toward the cost of time, there's a

Re: [tw5] Re: [NodeJS][Android] TiddlyWiki takes 30 seconds to load modules in ARM architecture

Issue created. https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/3450 Arlen On Sat, Sep 15, 2018, 10:24 Arlen Beiler wrote: > Wow, vm.runInNewContext is the culprit. I changed the code to use the > Function factory and it loads in 2.5 seconds. > > I think I'll open an issue. > &

Re: [tw5] Re: [NodeJS][Android] TiddlyWiki takes 30 seconds to load modules in ARM architecture

Wow, vm.runInNewContext is the culprit. I changed the code to use the Function factory and it loads in 2.5 seconds. I think I'll open an issue. On Fri, Sep 14, 2018, 12:01 Riz wrote: > > > My input > > > -- > You received

Re: [tw5] Re: [TW5] Bob version 1.0.5 Salt Bagels, or I should probably let people know about the plugin library

How does the websockets work? Do you have it setup for data folders or just for the main Bob wiki. I don't know how Bob works (sorry, I should, I know), but I am trying to implement a standard interface for plugins to communicate with the server in a server-agnostic way, and I'm curious what your

Re: [tw5] Re: [NodeJS][Android] TiddlyWiki takes 30 seconds to load modules in ARM architecture

Maybe we should add a feature where it saves a render of the startup tiddlers which will display until the render tree is up and running. I wonder if it is possible to show a progress indicator as well, but the code we're talking about here is completely synchronous. I also wonder what would

[tw5] Re: [NodeJS][Android] TiddlyWiki takes 30 seconds to load modules in ARM architecture

After some more investigation, it seems like this is a known problem with v8 on ARM. On Wednesday, September 12, 2018 at 11:58:35 AM UTC+8, Arlen Beiler wrote: > > I ran some tests this morning and discovered why it takes so long for > TiddlyWiki and TiddlyServer to load datafolders o

[tw5] [NodeJS][Android] TiddlyWiki takes 30 seconds to load modules in ARM architecture

I ran some tests this morning and discovered why it takes so long for TiddlyWiki and TiddlyServer to load datafolders on Android with Dory and Termux. Apparently there is something about the process of converting the tiddlers into code that is very slow on android. TiddlyServer loads one file

Re: [tw5] Re: Twitter News -- Short Discussion of Logo

Totally! This has been my biggest pain point with TiddlyWiki. The pallate system is excellent but underused by the vanilla theme. We don't have enough good looking pallates. I made a dark background pallate that I use in all my wikis but I had to do a couple tweaks, I think. And codemirror should

Re: [tw5] Re: Implementing a true single tiddler display mode

That actually sounds like the easiest thing to do out of everything discussed here. All you need to do is hide the sidebar and make the background the same color as the tiddler. Then insert a widget in the tiddler that prevents navigation and put the tiddler content inside that. Or just don't have

Re: [tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki Saving Button on Windows

The full console output will definitely help to diagnose the problem. Thanks Arlen On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 3:38 AM Adam wrote: > I know that I need to reproduce the error and I will try. > > I have obviously changed the paths and it works, it saves the tiddlers, > but the behaviour is as I

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >