I'll spend some time testing this - though probably not much over the
Christmas period :-)
It would be good if other could also do some testing.
Note also that grmble hasn't finished working on this yet, see:
https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/tiddlywiki/issues/78#issuecomment-3254138
so we will need
Given Jeremy's statement I'd be interested in trying to make
TiddlyWiki5's format compatible with WikiCreole, but only if it can be
done without substantially impacting existing texts.
I've started a new discussion on this topic. I think it is certainly
possible to make TW more compatible with
I concur with HansBKK that you should adopt a standard wiki markup for
TW 5. I differ from in that I think you should adopt WikiCreole see:
http://www.wikicreole.org/wiki/Creole1.0
and
http://www.wikicreole.org/wiki/CreoleAdditions
The main reason for this recommendation is the WikiCreole markup
You also need to tag the tiddler with MarkdownFormat
Note also that this is a fairly experimental formatter and doesn't
support all markdown format.
Martin
On 18 October 2011 06:58, Data Computist lumeng@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:14 AM, colmjude colmj...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the reason we put the shadow area above the content is because
we thought that it made the TiddlyWiki file more human readable, at a
small cost to SEO. However I agree that SEO is probably more important
now so we can make the change in the next release.
Martin
On 23 August 2011 12:24,
The problem is that browsers have increased their security settings,
so the upgrade code cannot download the new tiddlywiki. The way around
this is to download the latest version of TW and then import you old
tiddlywiki into it. Once you have the latest TW, you should be able to
do future
does not get sufficient usage to
give us confidence in the release. The plan is to adopt a similar
approach with the next release.
Martin
On 19 August 2011 11:55, cd...@peermore.com chris.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 10, 5:54 pm, Martin Budden mjbud...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce
I'm not sure if I understand the difference between a fully
announced and tentative release.
The difference is that we are not yet recommending that general users
upgrade. Only developer users should upgrade. I know that new users
get 2.6.4, but new users tend not to have plugin compatibility
Ton,
I'm not sure why discussing a problem hurts TW and the community.
Surely it's best to be open with any problems.
I also don't really understand the reasoning behind reverting to
2.6.2. It's not that the upgrade functionality became broken in 2.6.3,
it's that the upgrade functionality that
Paulo,
your statement that TW is dead without explanation is rather
provocative. My view is that it is still very useful in its niche,
although that niche has changed with time and with other developments
on the web (not least TiddlySpace). Perhaps you no longer find it
useful, but that does not
I'm pleased to announce the release of version 2.6.3 of TiddlyWiki.
This is a minor upgrade, the main changes are a number of bug fixes
and also so minor refactoring of the code. See
https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/tiddlywiki/issues?sort=createddirection=descstate=closed
for a list of issues
Markus,
I'm inclined to agree with Ben - it's likely to be related to Apple
dropping Java support. Can you confirm if this issue is Java related?
(I won't be upgrading to Lion for a few days yet, but will check this
out when I have.)
Martin
On 21 July 2011 15:11, Ben Gillies
Thanks for finding this and pointing this out. I'll get it fixed.
Martin
On 2 February 2011 21:13, tiddlygrp tiddly...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A short test with a wget http://www.tiddlywiki.com and some
experimentation showed that the SplashScreen plugin was not run, i.e.
that the tiddlywiki
Following on from the comments:
All in all, I think the best route would be to leave the choice of
future platform to someone with an unbiased point of view.
I'll be perfectly happy to accept the decision of the community, if I
feel that it has been made through an open, transparent process.
I'll
Simon,
have you had any luck in isolating the plugin that causes the problem?
Martin
On 19 January 2011 07:23, Scott Simmons goo...@secret-hq.com wrote:
Hi, Jeremy --
I noticed it last night in my go-to browser, Maxthon (version 2.5.16), on
Windows 7. It also occurs in plain old IE8 on
We've just released version 2.6.2 of TiddlyWiki.
This is a maintenance release containing a variety of bugfixes and
enhancements.
It does have one major new feature: the ability to save options in the
TiddlyWiki document itself (this is in addition to the current ability
to save options in
, 14:06, Martin Budden mjbud...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the TiddlyWiki 2.6.2 beta release.
This release consists of a number of minor usability and hackability
enhancements, as described athttp://trac.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/History,
and one fairly major enhancement
We'll certainly give consideration to the suggestion of using the
filename as part of the cookie id, but not as part of the 2.6.2
release - it's too large a piece of work to slip in at the end of the
release cycle.
However, the baked cookies do offer a solution to your problem - the
UserName has
, Martin Budden mjbud...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the TiddlyWiki 2.6.2 beta release.
This release consists of a number of minor usability and hackability
enhancements, as described athttp://trac.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/History,
and one fairly major enhancement.
The major
I'm pleased to announce the TiddlyWiki 2.6.2 beta release.
This release consists of a number of minor usability and hackability
enhancements, as described at http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/History,
and one fairly major enhancement.
The major enhancement is the addition of persistent options,
At Jeremy's suggestion I'm looking at a halfway-house. So rather than
just have evaluated macro parameters switched on or off, we could have
a restricted evaluation: the code would be parsed and only executed if
it was 'safe'. The user would then have the choice of setting macro
parameter
that would be benificial from a version-mgt. perspective to all
translators. If not, the translations for v2.6.1 need to become kind
of a new branch.
Hope you understand my point. Thanks in advance and best regards,
Ton.
On 20 aug, 16:54, Martin Budden mjbud...@gmail.com wrote:
Ton
this is a maintenance release, is it correct to assume that
there are no consequences for translators c.q. TW translations?
I.e. there will be no changes in locale.en.js?
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Ton van Rooijen
On 18 aug, 15:02, Martin Budden mjbud...@gmail.com wrote:
We are pleased to announce
We are pleased to announce the release of TiddlyWiki 2.6.1:
http://www.tiddlywiki.com/
This is a maintenance release, containing a variety of bugfixes and
enhancements, but no new major features, see:
http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/History
Many thanks to all the contributors!
-- Martin
Works for me as well.
Dave - have you been able to repeat the problem?
Martin
On 15 August 2010 09:07, FND f...@gmx.net wrote:
Here is the file: http://www.giffmex.org/NotasGiffmex.html
1. When I rightclick to save to a folder and then open the saved file
in the folder, it tells me it wasn't
Eric,
Just to add my support to what everyone else has said.
Rudeness says much more about the person being rude than it says about
the person they are being rude to.
Martin
On 13 Apr, 09:56, Alex Hough r.a.ho...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Eric,
Just to add my support. The guy doesn't
Ton,
the original intention was to replace a lot of the core TiddlyWiki
functionality with its jQuery equivalent, by implementing that
functionality as lightweight wrappers around jQuery functions. It
turned out that this caused subtle incompatibilities with the old
TiddlyWiki functionality:
It's been pushed back.
Unfortunately there are some significant problems in allowing
ColorPalette support in themes, which is one of the reasons for
pushing it back.
Martin
On 1 Apr, 01:39, Mike eris...@gmail.com wrote:
Just noticed that Ticket #717 milestone has not changed . . .
Will,
I've done some testing using jQuery 1.4.1 and can confirm that all of
the basic functions work correctly.
We plan to upgrade the version of jQuery used in release 2.6 of
TiddlyWiki. We expect that jQuery 1.4.2 will be available before the
release of TW 2.6, so expect to use that.
Martin
Glad you like the adaptor.
To answer your questions: no, there are no immediate plans to support
table of contents. And no, there are no javascript scripts to convert
from TW to MW and vice-versa. As you say, there are various Perl
scripts that do this, but there not much use for what you want.
The MediaWikiAdaptor allows you to use sync to post tiddlers back to a
Mediawiki. The latest version of the MediaWikiAdaptor is at:
http://svn.tiddlywiki.org/Trunk/contributors/MartinBudden/adaptors/MediaWikiAdaptorPlugin.js
Martin
2009/12/9 kev kj...@hotmail.com:
thanks, some interesting
maybe?
Martin
2009/11/13 Raghu raghusidda...@gmail.com:
On Nov 12, 9:23 pm, Martin Budden mjbud...@gmail.com wrote:
You can specify the username and password in the MediaWikiAdaptorPlugin
tiddler.
I can see the two text boxes(username and password) in mediawiki
unplugged but I don't see
This is the root of the problem: ISO 8601 defines the start of the
week to be Monday, so if you set the start of the week to be any other
day, week numbers won't be correct.
I wrote the week number code (years ago) and tested it quite
extensively. I don't believe there are any errors if the
Rouilj,
well spotted. This is definitely an error.
Thanks,
Martin
On Aug 15, 5:45 am, rouilj rou...@cs.umb.edu wrote:
On Aug 14, 11:40 pm, Jonnan jonnan.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 13, 1:45 pm, FND f...@gmx.net wrote:
Have you tried the 2.5.3 beta?
Andrew,
this is very strange. I can't see how an upgrade can add these
tiddlers. Are you absolutely sure you didn't have them before the
upgrade?
Martin
2009/6/25 AndrewMc newsp...@post.com:
Hi Everyone
I just upgraded two of my TiddlyWikis to 2.5.2. I immediately noticed
that each TW had
tiddlers.
Cheers
Andrew
On Jun 25, 11:29 pm, Martin Budden mjbud...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew,
this is very strange. I can't see how an upgrade can add these
tiddlers. Are you absolutely sure you didn't have them before the
upgrade?
Martin
2009/6/25 AndrewMc newsp...@post.com:
Hi
You can use the filterTiddlers function
// Filter a list of tiddlers
//# filter - filter expression (eg tidlertitle [[multi word tiddler
title]] [tag[systemConfig]])
//# Returns an array of Tiddler() objects that match the filter expression
TiddlyWiki.prototype.filterTiddlers =
Shanny,
were these old TiddlyWikis created from a mediawiki? That is, is the
format of the tiddlers mediawiki format, or tiddlywiki format?
If the format is TiddlyWiki, then I'm afraid there is not really an
easy way of doing this.
Martin
2009/6/12 Shanny shan.poora...@googlemail.com:
How much data do you have to convert? If there is not too much, it
could be done manually: the syntax of mediawiki and tiddlywiki is not
that different, especially if you do not use markup.
An alternative would be to write a plugin that did most of the syntax
conversion and then manually check
39 matches
Mail list logo
