Your suggestion is the idea behind TiddlyServer. It's a nw.js app (so it
has a UI and everything) that basically runs a proxy server on
localhost:8000 that saves to the local filesystem. It doesn't even need to
all be in the same folder.
On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 7:39:49 AM UTC-4, Arlen B
Hi,
> Interestingly, Chrome Extensions from the chrome store are okay
Maybe you can use: 'Downloads Overwrite Existing Files',
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/downloads-overwrite-exist/fkomnceojfhfkgjgcijfahmgeljomcfk
Cheers,
Ton
--
You received this message because you are subscri
In my case, I opened the empty.html from tiddlywiki.com and used the normal
save button in empty.html which prompted the standard browser save dialog.
The only annoying part about that is I have to use the browser save and
figure out which of the numbered files is the latest version when opening
No Dropbox (it's blocked at the firewall, as is some of Google and many of
the more popular consumer cloud storage offerings). I can technically get
to OneDrive but I'm only allowed to use the work provided account. They get
grouchy if you use your own.
On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 4:28:38 PM
How do you get the TW html to your machine in the first place? Can you use
the default download/save mechanism, or does the security block all
downloads?
Have fun,
Mark
On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 11:47:20 AM UTC-7, Lost Admin wrote:
>
> In the extremely locked down corporate environment I wo
Hi Arlen,
That would certainly be interesting to see. Don't know if I would make the
shift, but I'm sure it would help others. To make it portable, I'd have to
compile the TW into single file format and save it to a device. That might
be a bit of a hassle on a regular basis.
I'm pretty sure wh
Lost Admin,
Would you consider possibly hosting your work TiddlyWikis on Dropbox and
accessing them through the browser this way? Or are you not allowed to for
some reason?
Thanks,
-Arlen
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Arlen Beiler wrote:
> I think you may have mentioned this before. This is w
I think you may have mentioned this before. This is what I was thinking of
when I wrote the above. Did you try installing TiddlyChrome at all?
I would also be interested to hear if there are others in this situation
and what you are able to do about it.
Mark S, I would be interested to hear your
In the extremely locked down corporate environment I work in, TiddlyWiki
itself is technically okay because it is 'just an html file'. Node.js
(node.exe) is not okay because it's not on the approved application list.
Firefox is not okay unless there is a good business need for it (basically
onl
Ok, what if I would write a new script for node that would basically be a
static file server? When you type in localhost it would show you a list of
directories to choose from. Once you open one of those directories it would
show you all the files and folders in it and allow you to open any one tha
This.
On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 9:26:24 AM UTC-5, Mark S. wrote:
>
> TW on node.js doesn't serve images. The fact that node.js can serve images
> is totally irrelevant until someone writes a version of TW on node.js that
> does.
>
> The thing is, if you start having to run a server, you no
TW on node.js doesn't serve images. The fact that node.js can serve images
is totally irrelevant until someone writes a version of TW on node.js that
does.
The thing is, if you start having to run a server, you no longer have a
simple solution. In fact, you could run any of a half dozen wikis
Node serves images. Chrome apps might be able to as well if done right, but
never tried. Any server-type solution will be able to serve images.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:49 AM, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki <
tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Much of the world spends their computing times on table
Much of the world spends their computing times on tablets and smart phones.
Some models can run a terminal (mine can't) if you want to spend a lot of
time fiddling with that sort of thing -- but by then you no longer have a
simple, easy to use turnkey solution.
It still doesn't address the ima
This is true, but on windows it is very easy to run a portable version, and
may be on Linux as well, I'm not sure. I'm pretty sure that covers most of
our users, though I realize it doesn't cover everyone. But isn't that
already a problem with TiddlyFox and TiddlyChrome?
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:
If TW on node.js served up images and other files, that might be almost
acceptable. Of course, you would still have problems when away from your
home node.js server.
Mark
On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 4:39:49 AM UTC-7, Arlen Beiler wrote:
>
> If someone knew how to do it, they would have. My Ti
If someone knew how to do it, they would have. My TiddlyChrome plugin is
the easiest way that I know of for Google Chrome. One thing I have not
explored is whether I can have the user select a folder and then edit any
file in that folder. Other than that (which is a good option) I don't know
of any
Firefox looks like its chosen to die for a while.
Its userbase is shrinking month by month.
Its ALREADY a minority report.
In November this year its goes over to WebExtensions.
By that time how will it differ from Chrome with market share already?
Would it be best if TiddlyWiki could have
18 matches
Mail list logo
