Re: [tw] Re: Help Me Get Past A Nearly Insurmountable Startup Hurdle on TW5 (experienced TWC user)

2016-08-17 Thread Arlen Beiler
Hi Steve, glad to be of help. The way TiddlySpace, TiddlyWeb, and the NodeJS server work is that all of them serve a copy of your tiddlywiki to the browser and then as you make changes each tiddler is saved individually back to the server, changes from the server also end up on the TiddlyWiki in

[tw] Re: Help Me Get Past A Nearly Insurmountable Startup Hurdle on TW5 (experienced TWC user)

2016-08-16 Thread stevesuny
(stripped out comments above). This is an interesting and informative discussion; thanks all for the contributions. Moving to TW5 was a bit painful, but so worth it. Though I still do miss some of the TWC features as discussed above. There was one sentence that Arlen wrote: *As far as

Re: [tw] Re: Help Me Get Past A Nearly Insurmountable Startup Hurdle on TW5 (experienced TWC user)

2016-08-15 Thread Arlen Beiler
What most people don't know about the TiddlyWiki NodeJS version is that it can actually run a file server and rest API to serve and save TiddlyWikis. I've used it quite a bit and it works very well. The biggest advantage for you in using it is that one wiki can inherit another. The biggest

[tw] Re: Help Me Get Past A Nearly Insurmountable Startup Hurdle on TW5 (experienced TWC user)

2016-08-15 Thread PMario
On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 1:43:37 PM UTC+2, PMario wrote: > > >> >> D) Is it best practice to use TW-style wiki markup or something else, >> specifically, is the Markdown plugin officially supported? >> > > I personally use TW markup and I don't even need to see it rendered. It > just

[tw] Re: Help Me Get Past A Nearly Insurmountable Startup Hurdle on TW5 (experienced TWC user)

2016-08-15 Thread PMario
David, Welcome back! On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 3:42:49 AM UTC+2, da...@bakins-bits.com wrote: > > First my questions, which I hope you'll help me with, then, if you care, > the context. > > I want to use TW5 for notetaking, on Windows, but shared (not > simultaneously) between multiple

[tw] Re: Help Me Get Past A Nearly Insurmountable Startup Hurdle on TW5 (experienced TWC user)

2016-08-15 Thread PMario
On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 10:37:09 AM UTC+2, Mat wrote: > > da...@bakins-bits.com wrote: >> >> >> A) I can choose from TiddlyIE, Node.js, and TiddlyDesktop. >> > > > TiddlyIE - I'm guessing you know that there is no such thing. There is > regular TW used on IE. I can't tell anymore if IE is

[tw] Re: Help Me Get Past A Nearly Insurmountable Startup Hurdle on TW5 (experienced TWC user)

2016-08-15 Thread Mat
It seems to me a few things have been mixed up: To first answer your question; you should likely have regular TW5 and I'd recommend tiddlyspot. da...@bakins-bits.com wrote: > > First my questions, which I hope you'll help me with, then, if you care, > the context. > > I want to use TW5 for

[tw] Re: Help Me Get Past A Nearly Insurmountable Startup Hurdle on TW5 (experienced TWC user)

2016-08-15 Thread 'Birthe C' via TiddlyWiki
Hi David, I agree with Mark. You can forget about Tiddlyspace. It was great with TWc, not so with TW5 and it is closing soon. Birthe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[tw] Re: Help Me Get Past A Nearly Insurmountable Startup Hurdle on TW5 (experienced TWC user)

2016-08-14 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
Yes, TWC was great and in many ways better than TW5. But time marches on. I notice that TiddlyFox on Firefox isn't on your short list. I think you're likely to get a lot of varying opinions. You're probably just going to have try things and see what works best for you. For me, node.js is too