[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-09-01 Thread NT
Hey Mat, you are a good observer. Indeed I am interested in using the wiki in a semantic way, in a RDF-like style. Would be awesome if you could do deductive reasoning over the connections of some more tiddlers. Semantic tagging could lift this a step further to realisation. But I am still at

[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-09-01 Thread Mat
NT, you might be interested in tiddlywizard @Jed / @inmysocks "Gen Tags ". It aims to solve the recurring request for different *types *of tags ("typed tags", "sematic tagging", and more

[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-09-01 Thread NT
Oh nice - great stuff, Danielo! Special Thx for this effort. The code is always less than I expect it would be. I have to get back more into Wiki syntax again. For now this topic is solved for me. Thanks to everyone. Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 13:44:52 UTC+2 schrieb Danielo Rodríguez: > >

[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-09-01 Thread Danielo Rodríguez
I have edited my previous answer, but in case anyone is reading the emails, here is the correct filter: <$list filter="[tags[]is[missing]!is[system]]"> {{!!title||$:/core/ui/TagTemplate}} <$list filter="[tag]"> {{!!title}} -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-09-01 Thread Danielo Rodríguez
> > Ok, by trying to answer the question for a list of keywords on my own my >> best guess would be http://tiddlywiki.com/#is%20Operator >> > If you search the keyword Operator you will get a list of operators. No all of them are user friendly or evident, so feel free to ask. If the list

[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-09-01 Thread NT
Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 12:00:37 UTC+2 schrieb NT: > > Eucaly, that's perfect so far. Thank you, man. > > I know the "system" filter, but I didn't know the "missing" keyword. Are > there others keywords as well? Is somewhere a list of keywords? > Ok, by trying to answer the question

[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-09-01 Thread NT
Eucaly, that's perfect so far. Thank you, man. I know the "system" filter, but I didn't know the "missing" keyword. Are there others keywords as well? Is somewhere a list of keywords? If the list would consist of tagpills instead of pure links then - with a click - you could see the tiddlers

[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-09-01 Thread NT
Oh Danielo, you're right - have not seen this. Thanks a lot. Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2016 08:25:22 UTC+2 schrieb Danielo Rodríguez: > > Hello NT, > > Take a look at Eucaly's answer > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To

[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-09-01 Thread Danielo Rodríguez
Hello NT, Take a look at Eucaly's answer -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send

[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-08-31 Thread NT
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2016 13:46:53 UTC+2 schrieb PMario: > > > you can use: > <> .. to show all used tags. *Those, that > are shown in italic don't have a corresponding tiddler. * > > <> to list all tiddlers, that are > untagged. > > You may also have a look at the *right sidebar: More:

[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-08-31 Thread Eucaly J
maybe [tags[]is[missing]] or [tags[]is[missing]!is[system]] PMario ...: > you can use: > <> .. to show all used tags. *Those, that > are shown in italic don't have a corresponding tiddler. * > > <> to list all tiddlers, that are > untagged. > -- You received this message because you are

[tw] Re: Show a list of all tags without "companion" tiddler

2016-08-31 Thread PMario
On Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 1:04:38 PM UTC+2, NT wrote: > > As a prerequisite I want the notion to be clarified. > > Not every tag has a tiddler with the identical name, automatically - you > have to create it. > right > Since also not for every tiddler there is a tag with the same