[tw] Re: TiddlyLock - a simple multi-user TiddlyWiki dumb question

2013-11-08 Thread Tobias Beer
Whomever maintains TiddlyFox, Theoretically speaking, how far fetched would it be to have TiddlyFox provide a read+write API allowing TiddlyWiki (i.e. its javascript framework) to access the local filesystem? ...so as to be able to: — manage backups (LessBackupsPlugin style) — update lock files

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlyLock - a simple multi-user TiddlyWiki dumb question

2013-11-08 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi Tobias I'll never support TiddlyLock-type functionality with TiddlyFox. TiddlyLock is broken; it tries to do something that is only possible if you've got atomic file system operations. Using TiddlyLock for it's intended purpose would lead to data loss under stress. Best wishes Jeremy On

[tw] Re: TiddlyLock - a simple multi-user TiddlyWiki dumb question

2013-11-07 Thread Jeff Smith
I was afraid it might be something like that. Thanks for the info! On Wednesday, November 6, 2013 6:50:36 PM UTC-5, Eric Shulman wrote: On Wednesday, November 6, 2013 1:56:36 PM UTC-8, Jeff Smith wrote: I am trying to use the TiddlyLock plugin with the latest TiddlyWiki core (2.8.1) and it

[tw] Re: TiddlyLock - a simple multi-user TiddlyWiki dumb question

2013-11-06 Thread Jeff Smith
Richard, I am trying to use the TiddlyLock plugin with the latest TiddlyWiki core (2.8.1) and it doesn't seem to be working. Have you been able to validate that it works with this core? Thanks, Jeff On Thursday, June 21, 2007 10:52:17 AM UTC-4, weta wrote: Is that because - the same PC

[tw] Re: TiddlyLock - a simple multi-user TiddlyWiki dumb question

2013-11-06 Thread Eric Shulman
On Wednesday, November 6, 2013 1:56:36 PM UTC-8, Jeff Smith wrote: I am trying to use the TiddlyLock plugin with the latest TiddlyWiki core (2.8.1) and it doesn't seem to be working. Have you been able to validate that it works with this core? The problem you're having probably isn't