[tw] Re: problems to make a javascript macro work

2015-12-04 Thread NT
I adapted the javascript for my purpose and it worked - partly. When I call the javascript function with a string as parameter it works fine, when I call the javascript function with a wikitext variable the wikitext variable it not "solved" into it's "value". I'll open a new issue for that.

[tw] Re: problems to make a javascript macro work

2015-12-01 Thread NT
Hi BJ Am Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2015 16:26:03 UTC+1 schrieb BJ: > > Hi NT, > you may be missing the fields > > type: application/javascript > module-type: macro > > you can set the type by editing the tiddler and selecting > 'application/javascript' from the dropdown list, > thanks, I did this

[tw] Re: problems to make a javascript macro work

2015-12-01 Thread Eric Shulman
On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 9:40:00 AM UTC-8, NT wrote: > > you can add a field 'module-type' from the drop down list and then add the >> value 'macro' >> > YES, that's the thing I expected I could do. But there is no 'module-type' > in the drop down list!!! I am using TiddlyWiki5.1.9 >

[tw] Re: problems to make a javascript macro work

2015-12-01 Thread BJ
On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 5:40:00 PM UTC, NT wrote: > > Hi BJ > > Am Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2015 16:26:03 UTC+1 schrieb BJ: >> >> Hi NT, >> you may be missing the fields >> >> type: application/javascript >> module-type: macro >> >> you can set the type by editing the tiddler and selecting

[tw] Re: problems to make a javascript macro work

2015-12-01 Thread BJ
important! It is necessary to reload you tw after making changes to a javascript tiddler On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 5:59:21 PM UTC, BJ wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 5:40:00 PM UTC, NT wrote: >> >> Hi BJ >> >> Am Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2015 16:26:03 UTC+1 schrieb BJ: >>> >>>

[tw] Re: problems to make a javascript macro work

2015-12-01 Thread NT
Am Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2015 18:51:52 UTC+1 schrieb Eric Shulman: > > On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 9:40:00 AM UTC-8, NT wrote: >> >> you can add a field 'module-type' from the drop down list and then add >>> the value 'macro' >>> >> YES, that's the thing I expected I could do. But there is

[tw] Re: problems to make a javascript macro work

2015-12-01 Thread NT
Am Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2015 18:59:21 UTC+1 schrieb BJ: > > > > On Tuesday, December 1, 2015 at 5:40:00 PM UTC, NT wrote: >> >> Hi BJ >> >> Am Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2015 16:26:03 UTC+1 schrieb BJ: >>> >>> Hi NT, >>> you may be missing the fields >>> >>> type: application/javascript >>>

[tw] Re: problems to make a javascript macro work

2015-12-01 Thread NT
Am Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2015 19:21:55 UTC+1 schrieb BJ: > > important! > It is necessary to reload you tw after making changes to a javascript > tiddler > >> >> Yes I knew and I did, thanks for trying harder :-) But I will repeat it to be sure! -- You received this message because you are

[tw] Re: problems to make a javascript macro work

2015-12-01 Thread BJ
Hi NT, you may be missing the fields type: application/javascript module-type: macro you can set the type by editing the tiddler and selecting 'application/javascript' from the dropdown list, you can add a field 'module-type' from the drop down list and then add the value 'macro' As Mario

[tw] Re: problems to make a javascript macro work

2015-12-01 Thread PMario
Hi NT, I think it would be easier, if you describe, what you want to do, instead let us guess. I personally think, we can solve your problem using standard tools instead of a js macro, which contains hard coded strings. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[tw] Re: problems to make a javascript macro work

2015-12-01 Thread NT
Ok, that's a point. So I'll split the solution I want to have in two parts. First, a direct solution, second a solution with help of a javascript macro. First things first: I have a "normal" macro that works. It's: \define d1jpg(filename) [img[./_new/Scout/$filename$.jpg]] \end That macro gets