Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub (cont)

2016-11-22 Thread Marc Ferguson
Thank you I will take a look. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 22, 2016, at 5:42 PM, John Newell wrote: > > Thanks - and "hi" Richard... > > I am aware of the TiddlyManuals - an extensive project that - in my humble > opinion - is great as a resource - but not as a

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub (cont)

2016-11-22 Thread John Newell
Thanks - and "hi" Richard... I am aware of the TiddlyManuals - an extensive project that - in my humble opinion - is great as a resource - but not as a "good read" It works as a manual. But have you tried opening it in a mobile device? ( several accessibility issues! ) For those of us

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub (cont)

2016-11-22 Thread RichardWilliamSmith
To start a new thread just click "new topic" on the main page of the group. Although it's not exactly the same thing, you may be interested in Dickon Bevington's extensive use of tiddlywiki for producing clinical manuals. http://tiddlymanuals.tiddlyspace.com/ Regards, Richard -- You received

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub (cont)

2016-11-21 Thread Marc Ferguson
Thanks for your nod of support. I don't want to get in the way of providing ePub type stuff. Perhaps a new thread but I don't know how to start it. I'm thinking that TW is pretty useful as it is and could make some great dynamic textbooks or notebook where a basic accelerometer is all you

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub (cont)

2016-11-21 Thread John Newell
Hi Marc - and thanks for your input. It's great to see another format where TW can provide a solution as a dynamic (e)book. I hope I am reading this correctly - but the idea you have it to produce a collective TWebook - pristine -organised -well presented. distribute it and allow for each

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub (cont)

2016-11-21 Thread Marc Ferguson
I thought I'd chime in on this. I may be a renegade but I think TW5 can be much better than an ePub because of its ability for the user to make changes. Our church has an excellent but dated family activity book. It has lots of ideas with descriptions of each idea. Families that can't think of

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub (cont)

2016-11-21 Thread magillamax
Hi Jed with Spiritual Quest - that required a mix of icon navigation, images, embeds, large icons plus feature art as well as text. I could get away with iphone & ipad on the one template ( portrait format ) which is the "natural" tilt for their readers but laptops and desktops SWITCH to

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub.

2016-07-04 Thread Josiah Hincks
no idea what you are talking about :-). *Josiah Hincks* - jos...@assays.tv +39 392-635-5267 skype "beabonobo" - twitter "beabonobo" - linkedin "josiah hincks" www.flickr.com/assays - www.vimeo.com/assays On 4 July 2016 at

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub.

2016-07-04 Thread JN mag@gmail
That’s the rendering that TiddlyWiki gives you when it is viewed with JavaScript disabled. It’s not clear why that would be happening. The padlet service cannot forcibly disable JavaScript while serving the file over http(s); the only alternative I can think of is that the service is stripping

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub.

2016-07-04 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi John > On 4 Jul 2016, at 05:31, John Newell wrote: > > Hi there - I would love to provide templates as requested - except I have > come across a recent hurdle - I can't get a reliable delivery of the final > HTML file from server to iphone (etc) = my favoured "padlet"

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub.

2016-06-17 Thread John Newell
hi there TOTALLY agree ▶️ I've introduced hundreds to TW - and if each of us TW aficionados has been doing the same - then there's a big userbase out there - but the increased complexity confuses many, ( like it's built for nerds and not Joe Average ) Following the lead of Ghost.org and

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub.

2016-06-17 Thread Josiah
Ciao John Newell I am very much in harmony with the idea of wide USAGE without needing full blown editing. By way of background it seems to me that there is a huge userbase for TW that never appears here and is hard to document because (by design) TW does not track users. The MASS effect of

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub.

2016-06-17 Thread John Newell
Missed a bit . My objective is to have thousands of reader using tiddlywiki - with ease ( though not editing it ) . Or at least - not in the way you'd imagine. Cheers JN John Newell MAGILLA ENTERPRISES 0419992172 j...@social.as tw: @magillamax > On 17 Jun 2016, at 4:24 PM, Mat

Re: [tw] Re: TW5 as a better option than ePub.

2016-06-17 Thread John Newell
Hi Mat Thanks for the email, I would be honoured to do so. Soon after launching I will strip it back as a twBook template and provide it - don't think of it as earth-shattering stuff ( but with help I am sure it could be ! ) I believe what TW is capable of FAR EXCEEDS the functionality and