[tw] Re: Plinks! - a simple bookmarking adaptation of TW

I couldn't find the post! Did you remove it for editing or something?!! On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 10:07:26 UTC+5:30, David Gifford wrote: > > I added this to the Reddit everyone has been talking about, but wanted to > mention it here too. > > http://giffmex.org/twexamples/plinks.html > > This

[tw] Plinks! - a simple bookmarking adaptation of TW

I added this to the Reddit everyone has been talking about, but wanted to mention it here too. http://giffmex.org/twexamples/plinks.html This is a simpler bookmarking TW than my old Tidmarks. 1. Title, tag, paste url in the plink field. 2. There is a list of tags with a filtered search on

Re: [tw] Re: Plinks! - a simple bookmarking adaptation of TW

https://www.reddit.com/r/TiddlyWiki5/ On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Riz wrote: > I couldn't find the post! Did you remove it for editing or something?!! > > On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 10:07:26 UTC+5:30, David Gifford wrote: >> >> I added this to the Reddit

[tw] Re: [TW5] MacroCall Widget & sub-macros

I got it from what was used as 3rd example on http://tiddlywiki.com/#MacroCallWidget. Looks like there are a few errors on it. It works now, thanks. Le lundi 12 décembre 2016 05:10:48 UTC+1, Mark S. a écrit : > > Even though they may sometimes seem to perform as functions, macros just >

[tw] Re: Tiddlywiki for business

My understanding is that multi-user (multi-writers) TW is being thought about by @Jermolene as a possible step in the further evolution of TW? On Monday, 12 December 2016 00:31:25 UTC+1, Dragon Cotterill wrote: > > This is where I see the real downsides of using TW in a business situation. > >

Re: [tw] Conveying: Moans about poor documentation

Ciao Mat I'd like to reply to this bit-by-bit ... Mat wrote: I'm against distracting interim solutions or parallel solutions of other > kinds. ANY other system would mean people would have to e.g register for > yet another thing, learn new UI's and more lingo and it would scatter and >

[tw] Re: Lost work two times with tiddlywiki node version

Sorry for the angry vent, that was uncalled for. I was really upset. The bug, wherever it lies, is hard to reproduce. I am running a node.js instance, and accessing it via the browser (actually via a custom-made electron app which I had eventually planned to release publicly). When I usually

Re: [tw] Conveying: Moans about poor documentation

Ciao Mat & all A footnote on Google Groups ... I'm not sure if everyone is aware that Google Groups does support TAGS. The moderator has to create them. And, as far as I understand it, you have have apply at least one when you post. I'm unclear how that works with people who work through

[tw] Re: [TW5] MacroCall Widget & sub-macros

Unfortunately they don't show the contents of the "textMaker" macro. I imagine it would have worked as long as "textMaker" didn't use a transclude widget. Mark On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 3:05:08 AM UTC-8, William RENOU wrote: > > I got it from what was used as 3rd example on >

Re: [tw] Conveying: Moans about poor documentation

Ciao Mat On most things I know jack-shit. On Twitter I know what I am talking about. The Twitter UUID system is elegant & minimalist. Its final result is best viewed in Tweetdeck rather than vanilla Twitter. Tweetdeck makes best use of it. The threading system that depends on the UUID is

Re: [tw] Conveying: Moans about poor documentation

Ciao Mat & all In the space of a short time Riz, a guy who likes to do, has created a Reddit for TW5 that has discussion (http://tinyurl.com/h884qlj) that has six resource libraries (http://tinyurl.com/zmuplqp), that is developing a post labelling system based on tiddlywiki.com tags so you can

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

Tobias I think that could work very nicely. Thanks Steve Wharton. On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 1:04:52 PM UTC-5, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > I could extend: > > http://tobibeer.github.io/tw5-plugins/#contains > > with an option that goes: > > contains: $exactly[] > > In other

[tw] Re: Lost work two times with tiddlywiki node version

Tiddlywiki was running on electron v1.4 on Arch Linux; the server side was running on electron's server (a node.js process), and the webpage was running on electron's chromium process. So all of it was localhost. I was working on a slightly modified fork (https://github.com/bloff/TiddlyWiki5),

Re: [tw] Conveying: Moans about poor documentation

Josiah wrote: > > > In the space of a short time Riz, a guy who likes to do, has created a > Reddit for TW5 that has discussion (http://tinyurl.com/h884qlj) > Riz is doing great stuff! (Thanks Riz!) So, if I understand, Reddit is a substitute for the boards but with "voting" on answers,

[tw] Re: Lost work two times with tiddlywiki node version

You still haven't told us anything about your set-up. What browser are you using? What operating system? Is node.js running on the same machine or a different machine than the machine where you are working? You say that you've lost 14 hours worth of work. But from your description, it sounds

[tw] Re: Tiddlywiki for business

I just had a brief discussion with Jeremy Ruston on Twitter about multi-writer capabilities in TW. He clarified that actually the basic mechanisms of the node.js version of TW ALREADY supports multiple user writes. The issue is "polish" ... i.e. that the UI needs improving for it to work

[tw] Re: Lost work two times with tiddlywiki node version

Hi Bruno, Some questions: - Which OS do you use on your client-browser? OS and Version? - electron version? - Is there a network connection in between, or is it localhost? - Where does the node.js server run? OS, V? that's it for the moment. -m -- You received this message

[tw] Re: Tiddler Movable

Maybe with a storyview ? Do you know to create one ? I need to question the developper forum ? Thanks for your help. Le mardi 22 novembre 2016 15:54:55 UTC+1, Del Vee a écrit : > Hi everybody, > > I would like to meve tiddler like on this old tiddlywiki ( >

Re: [tw] Conveying: Moans about poor documentation

Hi Josiah, > Its worth noting a MAJOR theme is the discussion was we are losing > valuable documentation all the time by not having an organised way to look > at past threads. TAGs might help, at least as an interim. > Please keep in mind that discussing a subject matter and responding with

[tw] Re: Lost work two times with tiddlywiki node version

Yes it was. On Monday, 12 December 2016 19:46:54 UTC+1, Mark S. wrote: > > But, was all that work -- 3 to 5 pages -- in a single tiddler? > > Mark > > On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 9:13:45 AM UTC-8, Bruno Loff wrote: >> >> Tiddlywiki was running on electron v1.4 on Arch Linux; the server side

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

Hi Steve, I could extend: http://tobibeer.github.io/tw5-plugins/#contains with an option that goes: contains: $exactly[] In other words, give me all tiddlers where the field contains exactly and only the titles specified via . Would that help? Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this

Re: [tw] Conveying: Moans about poor documentation

> > Riz is doing great stuff! (Thanks Riz!) > > So, if I understand, Reddit is a substitute for the boards but with > "voting" on answers, right? > > My pleasure. Reddit is more than that. Leaving aside my bias because reddit is an open-source undertaking, it has more features that meets

Re: [tw] Conveying: Moans about poor documentation

It has up-voting. It has tagging (not sure if only moderators can do that?). It has any number of supplemental wikis needed. On Monday, 12 December 2016 18:33:24 UTC+1, Mat wrote: > > Josiah wrote: >> >> >> In the space of a short time Riz, a guy who likes to do, has created a >> Reddit for TW5

[tw] Re: Lost work two times with tiddlywiki node version

But, was all that work -- 3 to 5 pages -- in a single tiddler? Mark On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 9:13:45 AM UTC-8, Bruno Loff wrote: > > Tiddlywiki was running on electron v1.4 on Arch Linux; the server side was > running on electron's server (a node.js process), and the webpage was >