Ciao Mat I'd like to reply to this bit-by-bit ...
Mat wrote: I'm against distracting interim solutions or parallel solutions of other > kinds. ANY other system would mean people would have to e.g register for > yet another thing, learn new UI's and more lingo and it would scatter and > fragment the docs and info (or repeat it) and I strongly fear this would > split the community and be confusing. > I agree AND disagree. I AGREE that interim solutions that are not in a core central solution add to fragmentation. I guess the question is whether fragmentation is worth the upsides that better ways of helping people NOW help enough. Its a trade-off and one worth considering. I DISAGREE mainly about TIMING (hence the NOW, above). This thread, perhaps more than many previous on documentation issues, is closer to a clearer consensual outcome than any before. I love what you guys are doing with TWED. But, as you say, you are small in number and many, many issues needs to be sorted AND implemented. Do you have the time? When will it happen? THAT should be a factor in this. Because otherwise we are just gonna go round this loop again in a few months. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/34a21ffe-c18e-4d67-b81e-499b66817887%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
