[tw] Re: Is there a permanent TiddlyFox solution?

2017-09-18 Thread Jim W
Forgive my ignorance, I've looked for some kind of consensus on what happens when TiddlyFox stops working when Firefox 57 gets here but haven't really found one. For a long time TiddlyWiki/TiddlyFox user what's the best course of action if I'm not willing to give up standard Firefox (I don't

[tw] Re: Is there a permanent TiddlyFox solution?

2017-09-19 Thread Jim W
>From the FirefoxESR page: "Who is it not for? Individual users who always want the latest features, performance enhancements and technologies in their browser without waiting for them to become available in ESR several development cycles later." Unfortunately I fall into that camp but the

[tw] Re: Is there a permanent TiddlyFox solution?

2017-09-21 Thread Jim W
UTC-5, PMario wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 3:37:20 PM UTC+2, Jim W wrote: >> >> I converted over to Node.js but I guess now I've lost the ability to >> encrypt all my tiddlers >> <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/1073>? There's a plu

[tw] Re: Is there a permanent TiddlyFox solution?

2017-09-20 Thread Jim W
some people are having challenges getting set-up the way they want. Without > a CouchDB server you could easily lose everything (clearing all local data > would delete all your saved content if you don't have CouchDB). > > > On Monday, September 18, 2017 at 3:42:52 PM UTC-4, Jim