On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 3:54:28 PM UTC+2, michaelha...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thank you for clearing that up, and for your patience with me. I can only
> assume I am one of the awkward people who uses an awkward date format.
>
No, You and your date format are perfectly fine ;). ... It's just
Mark,
Thank you for clearing that up, and for your patience with me. I can only
assume I am one of the awkward people who uses an awkward date format.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
The filter Mario is suggesting doesn't exist -- that's why it doesn't work.
I guess I wonder how often anyone needs this particular functionality?
Mark
On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 7:54:27 PM UTC-7, michaelha...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Mario,
>
> If I were to try sortbydate:finished[DD/MM/],
Mario,
If I were to try sortbydate:finished[DD/MM/], how would you suggest I
integrate it into the list I have at the moment?
If this is the basic form:
<$list filter="[!has[draft.of]tag[reading]sort[finished]]">
//<$link to={{!!title}}><$view field="title"/>// <$view
field="author"/> |
On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 8:00:58 PM UTC+2, Mark S. wrote:
>
> sortddmm[mydatefield]
>
>
I was thinking about a syntax similar to this
sortbydate:fieldname[format] eg: sortbydate:finished[DD/MM/YYY] which
would make it possible to use any http://tiddlywiki.com/#DateFormat
-m
--
You
For anyone interested in living dangerously, here is my first attempt at
writing a filter. In the filter syntax, it takes the form
sortddmm[mydatefield]
I have barely tested it, and have no idea what happens if you throw
incorrectly formatted stuff at it. It wants dates like
That has done it! Thank you, Mark, and everyone who was kind enough to help
me find a solution.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
The syntax is !sort[created]
Good luck!
Mark
On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 10:13:26 AM UTC-7, michaelha...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> Thank you, that method looks like it should work. Having tried it though,
> I find myself running into a bit of an issue. I have updated my code to
> look
Mark,
Thank you, that method looks like it should work. Having tried it though, I
find myself running into a bit of an issue. I have updated my code to look
like this:
<$list filter="[!has[draft.of]tag[reading]sort[!created]]">
//<$link to={{!!title}}><$view field="title"/>// <$view
If your "finished" tiddlers were created on the same date they were
finished, then sorting by "created" instead of "finished" should accomplish
what you want. The "finished" field then becomes a link/descriptor field.
For those tiddlers that you did not create on the actual finish date, you
Thank you, everyone, for your input, but--and I may be mistaken--I think
this may have gotten off topic somewhere. I am not trying to change my
journal tiddlers (if I can help it). I am trying to make a list of books I
have read, each as its own tiddler, and organized by the date I finished
... or sort[created] for the creation date.
You can also make the created date visible by changing the value of
$:/config/EditTemplateFields/Visibility/created to "show". That would allow
you to fix those journal entries that had been created out of order. You
have to be careful not to delete
If your "finished"-field is identical to your last modification you could
try sort[modified].
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
michaelha... & PMario
i am not a programmer BUT isn't the fact that these JOURNAL entries were
CREATED at certain exact times recorded at that moment into a (hidden)
field? Could they not be sorted by that?
josiah
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 15:06:32 UTC+2, PMario wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, May
may be an extension similar to sortby:
http://tiddlywiki.com/#sortby%20Operator:[[sortby%20Operator]]%20[[sortby%20Operator%20%28Examples%29]]
eg: sortbydate[DD/MM/] or so
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe
On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 2:44:55 PM UTC+2, michaelha...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Thank you for your help. Unfortunately I have about three and a half years
> worth of journal tiddlers already, and renaming all of those for the sake
> of one list really does not seem efficient. I expect I will
Mario,
Thank you for your help. Unfortunately I have about three and a half years
worth of journal tiddlers already, and renaming all of those for the sake
of one list really does not seem efficient. I expect I will just have to
find some other way of organizing the information.
Thanks,
On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 1:54:36 PM UTC+2, michaelha...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Thank you for your suggestion. While that is certainly something I can
> try, my difficulty stems from the fact that my journal tiddlers are titled
> in a dd/mm/ format.
>
I see!
> If I was to list the
Mario,
Thank you for your suggestion. While that is certainly something I can try,
my difficulty stems from the fact that my journal tiddlers are titled in a
dd/mm/ format. If I was to list the dates in the "began" and "finished"
fields as /MM/DD, then they would no longer function as
Hi Michael,
TW doesnt know that your field should be interpreted as a date, So the sort
order is alphabetical.
You can use /MM/DD as a format. It will still be sorted alphabetically
but this time it works, since this format naturally sorts.
have fun!
mario
--
You received this message
20 matches
Mail list logo
