[tw] Re: [NOOB] Transclusion, Templates, Filters and Tags vs Fields

2016-05-13 Thread progetti
*One of the things in TW is how it looks easy, but isn't so always. its very power and flexibility can leave one in a desert of uncertainty. That is my experience of it.* On Friday, 13 May 2016 20:57:54 UTC+2, wolfsong wrote: > > Mark > > This fixed it but after testing it again I really need

[tw] Re: [NOOB] Transclusion, Templates, Filters and Tags vs Fields

2016-05-13 Thread wolfsong
Mark This fixed it but after testing it again I really need to dig into this solution and make it work for me. The way I'm doing it creates the tabs but not the actual tiddlers and I may have a case where one of the subsections won't be required. This still helps though because now I know how

[tw] Re: [NOOB] Transclusion, Templates, Filters and Tags vs Fields

2016-05-12 Thread Mat
Much too late, shouldn't write this as it may be just be... not what you want. But at least it works; <$set name="aa" filter="[tag[HelloThere]]"> <$macrocall $name="tabs" tabsList=<> class="tc-vertical"/> I'm aksing my brain how to put inthe name of currentTiddler there but it tells me nto to

[tw] Re: [NOOB] Transclusion, Templates, Filters and Tags vs Fields

2016-05-12 Thread wolfsong
Hi Mat Yes. I want to create a template for a tabbed tiddler where the parent tiddler and each of the tabs have the same title but the tabs will also have a suffix. This way if I need to edit a tab, I will be able to verify which tiddler is the parent. I maybe looking at doing this the wrong

[tw] Re: [NOOB] Transclusion, Templates, Filters and Tags vs Fields

2016-05-12 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
I think you want a macro like this: \define monitoringtabs() <> \end put that in a tiddler with the tag $:/tags/Macro so that it is globally available. and then invoke it like this in each of your "parent" tiddlers: <> As Mat mentions, the tabs macro will use the caption field for the tab

[tw] Re: [NOOB] Transclusion, Templates, Filters and Tags vs Fields

2016-05-12 Thread Mat
Hi wolfsong On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 10:27:18 PM UTC+2, wolfsong wrote: > > After looking through the forum a bit I think I need something that's a > close to this > > where >

[tw] Re: [NOOB] Transclusion, Templates, Filters and Tags vs Fields

2016-05-12 Thread wolfsong
After looking through the forum a bit I think I need something that's a close to this where I have a template for a tabbed document that separates each section into it's own

[tw] Re: [NOOB] Transclusion, Templates, Filters and Tags vs Fields

2016-05-06 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
I think we would need to know more about your use case. For instance, what will all these articles have in common that might benefit from a template? How do you imagine using the sub-sections? Personally, I don't like solutions that clutter tag-space with single-use tags. To me tags seem

[tw] Re: [NOOB] Transclusion, Templates, Filters and Tags vs Fields

2016-05-06 Thread Mat
Hi wolfsong - I think you'll like TW What pmario says is (of course) correct but here's for a perhaps smaller first piecemeal start: What you want to do is pretty simple; What you do is to create a separate tiddler per each article and per each subsection. Tag the subsections with the name of

[tw] Re: [NOOB] Transclusion, Templates, Filters and Tags vs Fields

2016-05-06 Thread PMario
Hi Cristov, TiddlyWiki is great, if you use tags to "combine" your content tiddlers. transclusions are described here: http://tiddlywiki.com/#Transclusion list-links macro is one of the simplest macros to start with and get the feeling: http://tiddlywiki.com/#list-links%20Macro tabs macro is

[tw] Re: [NOOB] Transclusion, Templates, Filters and Tags vs Fields

2016-05-05 Thread wolfsong
I forgot to mention TW5. On Thursday, May 5, 2016 at 1:18:56 PM UTC-5, wolfsong wrote: > > I'm looking through the documentation and trying to grasp a few concepts > but I think I need more information. > > I want to setup a knowledge base with articles on a variety of subjects. > I'd like to