$set name=tid value= default=currentTiddler/
So, there's an empty string being passed as the attribute value. There's
no way for the set widget to distinguish that empty string as a missing
value that needs to be defaulted unless it regarded all empty strings as
missing values. The
have a look at:
http://tiddlywiki.com/#%24%3A%2Fcore%2Fui%2FTiddlerInfo%2FTagging
-m
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWiki group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Thanks Mario,
Not sure what you're trying to say as it basically does the same, only that
mine is not working.
Or are you suggesting I should use a transclusion template rather than an
actual macro?
Best wishes, Tobias.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Or are you suggesting I should use a transclusion template rather than an
actual macro?
Using a transclusion template appears to work, see...
- $:/templates/tagging
http://taggly5.tiddlyspot.com/#%24%3A%2Ftemplates%2Ftagging
- Class B http://taggly5.tiddlyspot.com/#Class%20B
\define tagging()
$list filter=[all[current]tagging[]]/
\end
This works, because it uses the default fallback template.
see this description quote from: http://tiddlywiki.com/#ListWidget
The content of the $list widget is an optional template to use for
rendering each tiddler in the list.
Le lundi 17 novembre 2014 13:41:26 UTC+1, Tobias Beer a écrit :
I was trying to create a simple tagging macro tagged $:/tags/Macro , so
I thought.
http://taggly5.tiddlyspot.com/#%24%3A%2Fmacros%2Ftagging
\define tagging()
$list filter=[all[current]tagging[]]
/$list
\end
Any reason
Thanks, Evolena, of course.
Because you defined your macro tiddler to be *plain/text* type, so it is
not interpreted.
Although, I'd quite like macro code to be displayed.
Any hints on how I could make tagging tiddler X work?
Best wishes, Tobias.
--
You received this message because
There must be a smarter solution, but you can try this macro definition:
\define tagging(title:currentTiddler)
$set name=myTitle value=$title$
myTitle
$list filter=[titlemyTitletagging[]]
/$list
/$set
\end
However for it to work with a title, you need to use a trick:
All content for current
(you can get rid of the myTitle line, it was here for investigating
purposes)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWiki group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Thanks Evolena,
However for it to work with a title, you need to use a trick:
All content for Class B...
tagging 'Class B'
The parameter with the title of the tiddler also contains ticks, so that
the value of the set widget is interpreted correctly (it should be
value=currentTiddler
You may want to try this for tags with spaces:
As a user, I'd probably like to define a list with ul or ol ... similar
to list-links
\define tagging(title, type:ul)
$type$
$list filter=[[$title$]tagging[]]li$linkcurrentTiddler/
$link/li/$list
/$type$
\end
tagging a b
tag a tiddler with: ab
Hi Mario,
You may want to try this for tags with spaces
Thanks for your reply. I believe, this leaves the problem of not being able
leave out the tiddler parameter and just do...
tagging
Best wishes, Tobias.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Monday, November 17, 2014 7:43:21 PM UTC+1, Tobias Beer wrote:
Hi Mario,
You may want to try this for tags with spaces
Thanks for your reply. I believe, this leaves the problem of not being
able leave out the tiddler parameter and just do...
tagging
Best wishes, Tobias.
Yes,
Yes, I thought about this. ... but the tiddler where you don't have a
parameter is the tag.
You can use list-links filter:[all[current]tagging[]]
Of course, that is possible and using the list widget or a transclusion
template too, but that was not the purpose of the exercise. ^_^
Best
Hi Tobias
If I understand correctly, the goal is to write a macro that lists the
tiddlers that are tagged by a specified tiddler, and you'd like the ability
to specify the the target tiddler, or leave it unspecified and default to
the current tiddler.
The obvious way to accomplish it doesn't in
The reason is that it is not possible to transclude a default macro
parameter value; the default value has to be specified as a string.
javascript:
I was wondering how difficult it might be to extend the set widget to allow
fora default fallback to be defined for when value is actually
The reason is that it is not possible to transclude a default macro
parameter value; the default value has to be specified as a string.
I was wondering how difficult it might be to extend the set widget so as to
allow a default value as a fallback for when the value is actually
undefined:
Hi Tobias
I was wondering how difficult it might be to extend the set widget so as
to allow a default value as a fallback for when the value is actually
undefined:
The trouble is that in many situations an empty string is a valid value
that shouldn't be defaulted; what we really want here
Hi Jeremy,
Bear in mind that macro parameters are processed with text substitution,
so passing Hello There as a title gives you value=Hello There, which
won't work as expected. The fix is to use quotes; triple quotes are
recommended because that allows titles to contain single or double
This example wouldn't work for a title containing spaces.
Ok, so let's consider the hypothetical syntax fixed...
\define tagging(title)
$set name=tid value=$title$ default=currentTiddler/
$list filter=[[tid]tagging[]]/
\end
The trouble is that in many situations an empty string is a
20 matches
Mail list logo
