[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-20 Thread steve
Tobias It worked just fine on my initial test case. I will also try some of the other features that you described in your announcement. Thanks Steve Wharton On Monday, December 19, 2016 at 2:11:16 PM UTC-5, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > >> I think that could work very nicely. >> > > Ha

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-19 Thread Tobias Beer
Hi Steve, > I think that could work very nicely. > Have a look at: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/tiddlywiki/D8wD1gkUWJI Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this grou

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-12 Thread steve
Tobias I think that could work very nicely. Thanks Steve Wharton. On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 1:04:52 PM UTC-5, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > I could extend: > > http://tobibeer.github.io/tw5-plugins/#contains > > with an option that goes: > > contains: $exactly[] > > In other words,

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-12 Thread Tobias Beer
Hi Steve, I could extend: http://tobibeer.github.io/tw5-plugins/#contains with an option that goes: contains: $exactly[] In other words, give me all tiddlers where the field contains exactly and only the titles specified via . Would that help? Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this m

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-11 Thread Tobias Beer
Hi Steve, Thanks for your reply. I still have no idea why you want a list of tiddlers that are "only tagged foo" but not any other tag ...about the process you imagine where this would be useful. Since I have you "on the line" so to speak is there any way to combine the > contains and count m

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-09 Thread steve
Tobias I'm glad you asked... My use case is to be able to do a quick visual scan of the tags for a particular subcategory of my wikis. For example, the attachment from my Nov 29 email shows the tagging patterns for music related tiddlers. I could do the same thing for action items, event logs,

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-09 Thread Tobias Beer
Hi steve, May I ask, other than: because I wanted to see if I can, what's the point of this "[taggedOnly[foo]]" exercise? Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving ema

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-09 Thread steve
All The listViaContains macro shown in an previous post does not identify exact matches. The xMatchTags macro listed below does return exact matches. It uses the "contain and "count" macros from Tobias Beer. My thanks to Tobias and the folks that kindly responded to my question. Steve Wharto

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-09 Thread steve
Cmari Yes there is and I somehow managed to not include it. Here it is ... Steve Wharton ``` \define listViaContains() <$list filter="[contains:tags $all]"> <$link><$view field="title"/>, \end <$set name=currentTags filter='[tags[]sort[]]'> <> ``` On Thursday, December 8, 2016 at 4:1

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-08 Thread cmari
Hi Steve, Is there another tiddler that contains the macro <>? Sorry if I overlooked something in your post. The table is really useful - thanks! cmari On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 5:45:28 AM UTC-8, steve wrote: > > An Update: > > Thanks to everything that has responded. Alas, thus far, I have

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-08 Thread cmari
Hi Stephen, Is there another tiddler that contains the <> macro? Even without it, the table is useful - thanks! (Sorry if I overlooked something in your post.) cmari On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 5:45:28 AM UTC-8, steve wrote: > > An Update: > > Thanks to everything that has responded. Alas, th

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-05 Thread steve
An Update: Thanks to everything that has responded. Alas, thus far, I have been unable to find or develop an exact match function. Here is the macro I promised that generates a table which lists tiddlers in order of their respective tags field. Each unique set of tags is listed on a separate li

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-12-01 Thread steve
PMario I will get to work to setup an TiddlySpot instance to compare the various solutions that have been suggested. Thanks everybody! My ultimate use case would be to have a macro, that given the name of an InputTiddler, lists all of the tiddlers that have the exact set of tags as the Input T

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-11-30 Thread PMario
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 7:02:25 PM UTC+1, steve wrote: > > Although I can't say that I understood the use of prefixes, the example > appeared to perform a similar action as a [tag[A]tag[B]] filter. It also > found the additional test tiddler tagded with A, B, and C. > Matabele's examp

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-11-30 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
I think there's a way to do this easily assuming: - You don't mind pressing a button to update results. - None of your tags has a space (this may not be essential) - You don't mind hand crafting the tag/label you're looking for. See below See code below. I added "About" and "Wid

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-11-30 Thread steve
Mario No quarrel from me that the all combinations functionality would be a reasonable github request. Steve Wharton On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 2:19:32 AM UTC-5, Mat wrote: > > Steve, I'd agree with PMario that it is a reasonable github request even > if you personally don't need all p

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-11-30 Thread steve
Matabele Thanks for the example. I tried out "Checklist Example -- Select by ANDing Tags". Although I can't say that I understood the use of prefixes, the example appeared to perform a similar action as a [tag[A]tag[B]] filter. It also found the additional test tiddler tagded with A, B, and C.

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-11-30 Thread PMario
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 8:56:41 AM UTC+1, Matabele wrote: > > There are a few examples of selecting by tag combinations here > . > thats interesting. thx for sharing. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "T

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-11-29 Thread Matabele
Hi There are a few examples of selecting by tag combinations here . regards On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 05:00:06 UTC+2, steve wrote: > > Hi: > > Does anyone know of a way to do an exact tag match, i.e., there is a one > to one correspondence between the tags

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-11-29 Thread Mat
Steve, I'd agree with PMario that it is a reasonable github request even if you personally don't need all possible combos in this case. To be able to get an exact tag match seems like a general enough need. I'm surprised such a request hasn't come up before, even if I'm sure the need for it has.

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-11-29 Thread steve
Jed, PMario To clarify, what I am trying to do is to list all of the unique sets of tags actually present in the wiki, not all possible combinations. Perhaps an example would help. I have uploaded a file called "listAsTableSortedByTags Example Output.pdf" that shows an example output showing a

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-11-29 Thread PMario
Hi Steve, I think, this could be a feature request (github issue) for a new filter operator. since the number of possible combinations rises non linear. So having nested lists will be not very convenient. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "

[tw] Re: How to do an exact match of tags

2016-11-28 Thread Jed Carty
I wrote a thing about how filter expressions can be represented as logic statements that may help you but I don't have the link on this computer. The quick answer is that you can use this: <$list filter='[tag[TableOfContents]]'> <$list filter='[is[current]tags[]]-[[TableOfContents]]' emptyMessa