[tw] Re: New and making a lot of mistakes

2016-04-03 Thread Hegart Dmishiv
Hi Christopher, Thanks for sharing a little more about your project. I see the distinction now: fantasy vs reality. Even so, your solution does give me pause for thought, and the answers you've been getting to your questions may well have application for what I'm doing as well. Also, your

[tw] Re: New and making a lot of mistakes

2016-04-03 Thread Christopher Londrie
I think that's partly because my end goals are slightly different. I need the ability to generate these while half-distracted and from specific and custom lists, and then have them instantly available. Most time I won't need to generate in bulk. This means a button I can press and dump out a

[tw] Re: New and making a lot of mistakes

2016-04-03 Thread Christopher Londrie
Most excellent and many thanks! With those new knowledge bits I can move on to construct the entire thing. On Sunday, April 3, 2016 at 8:06:12 AM UTC-5, Knut Franke wrote: > > On Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 11:49:29 PM UTC+2, Christopher Londrie wrote: >> >> 1) If I remove the field[corpname]

[tw] Re: New and making a lot of mistakes

2016-04-03 Thread Knut Franke
On Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 11:49:29 PM UTC+2, Christopher Londrie wrote: > > 1) If I remove the field[corpname] I'm able to successfully pull the > titles of the GenSource: tiddler(s), however with it, I get null as a > result, I've made absolutely sure that I've made no spelling mistakes and

[tw] Re: New and making a lot of mistakes

2016-04-02 Thread Hegart Dmishiv
Hi Christopher, Sorry, I don't have any answers for your questions, but I just wanted to say that I was impressed with what you've done here. I've spent the last week or two trying to achieve something similar, except I'm using a Google Sheets spreadsheet

[tw] Re: New and making a lot of mistakes

2016-04-02 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
Does it work better if you use "get[corpname]" instead of "field[corpname]" ? Mark On Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 2:49:29 PM UTC-7, Christopher Londrie wrote: > > I'm able to do this at all thanks to Tobias Beer's really easy to use > "Random" plugin.