Hi Tobias
I'll never support TiddlyLock-type functionality with TiddlyFox. TiddlyLock
is broken; it tries to do something that is only possible if you've got
atomic file system operations. Using TiddlyLock for it's intended purpose
would lead to data loss under stress.
Best wishes
Jeremy
On F
Whomever maintains TiddlyFox,
Theoretically speaking, how far fetched would it be to have TiddlyFox
provide a read+write API allowing TiddlyWiki (i.e. its javascript
framework) to access the local filesystem? ...so as to be able to:
— manage backups (LessBackupsPlugin style)
— update lock files
I was afraid it might be something like that. Thanks for the info!
On Wednesday, November 6, 2013 6:50:36 PM UTC-5, Eric Shulman wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, November 6, 2013 1:56:36 PM UTC-8, Jeff Smith wrote:
>
>> I am trying to use the TiddlyLock plugin with the latest TiddlyWiki core
>> (2.8.1) a
On Wednesday, November 6, 2013 1:56:36 PM UTC-8, Jeff Smith wrote:
> I am trying to use the TiddlyLock plugin with the latest TiddlyWiki core
> (2.8.1) and it doesn't seem to be working. Have you been able to validate
> that it works with this core?
>
The problem you're having probably isn't di
Richard,
I am trying to use the TiddlyLock plugin with the latest TiddlyWiki core
(2.8.1) and it doesn't seem to be working. Have you been able to validate
that it works with this core?
Thanks,
Jeff
On Thursday, June 21, 2007 10:52:17 AM UTC-4, weta wrote:
>
> > Is that because
> > - the same
5 matches
Mail list logo