I know I may not get this but...
I get furious with this kind of security thinking, they are going to be more
exposed to risk because no one knows how to use modern tools and protection.
So I understand you did this ! Rename the HTML file to a txt file or Open
your preferred and up to date
The next step is starting the compare
You could try diff'ing the two files (if you don't have access to a good
diff tool, you could use some wiki engine with revision control).
My guess is that will not be too useful though, as the changes are
presumably extensive.
-- F.
Good idea - if I had access to both versions on the same computer!
This is going to be a paper, pen and highlighter project. That's why
I was looking for some kind of recommendations on a priority listing
(first things first).
On Jun 15, 12:06 pm, FND f...@gmx.net wrote:
You could try diff'ing
Well, I opened the current version in Linux Kedit and printed it out
(196 pages, printed 4-up - 49 sheets). The next step is starting the
compare, and deciding what changes can be made in what order. I will
be using a backup copy of the destination file (burned enough times
for that!). Wish me
A contract I work on is similar. The 'normal people' are fearful of
the 'IT' people. Its not a software issue, its about the people. If
only 'IT people' were like TwPeople ...
Your company sounds like an interesting case study for an
organisational change project.
ALex
2009/6/9 AlanBCohen
the version is 1.06 per the Version tiddler. The current version at
the GtD TW website is 2.1.3 (from 1/2007)
That's a pretty ancient version then. (Though I'm not sure whether the
Version tiddler there reports the TiddlyWiki version or that of the GTD
adaptation.)
I agree it isn't very
I appreciate the thoughts; but I really can.'t argue with their
reasons for not allowing outside programs and data - in this
situation, it is reasonable on their part. BTW, I am consulting in
one of the IT groups, but they are highly silo'ed (also for good
reasons). I will, however submit a
Is there any capability to scan documents into your systems? Still may
not be practical, but stands a better chance than typing the changes
in.
I sympathize with the circumstances, not long ago I declined to renew
a contact largely because of an even more ridiculous situation: we had
NO access
On Jun 9, 2009, at 2:17 AM, Alex Hough wrote:
Your company sounds like an interesting case study for an
organisational change project.
Hmm. Perhaps -- if the interest is in organizations that are
impervious to change.
Regards,
Sorry for the confusion guys. Yes I meant GTD TiddlyWiki and the
version is 1.06 per the Version tiddler. The current version at the
GtD TW website is 2.1.3 (from 1/2007)
No, I can't get email of any kind from outside the organization; with
or without attachments.
I agree it isn't very
There is an older version of GdTiddlyWiki [...] It is legal for me to
bring in paper with words printed on it; I'm looking for some guidance
as to how to bring this older version up to date by comparing current
versions of CSS and tiddlers to the versions currently inside security
So
Can you get e-mail attachments? Mail a TW?
Do you mean 'GTD TiddlyWiki'?
ALex
2009/6/6 Alan Cohen alanbco...@gmail.com
I recently started a long-term project at a client that doesn't allow ANY
media to be brought in or any saving/downloading from the internet. They do
however have an
12 matches
Mail list logo
