I have two wikis that have made extensive use of
http://tiddlytools.com/#NestedSlidersPlugin
I'm unclear on the conclusion of this discussion -- is there a macro in TW5
that will enable my tiddlers with +++[x] ... === syntax to render correctly
without any changes?
--
You received this messag
>
> Recently, I've noticed that in some cases this works as expected, indeed.
> However, a while ago I've been trying trees of nested sliders and got
> different syntax bugs in each situation -- that's probably why I remembered
> that as "not supported". Unfortunately, I don't have a consistent
Hi Eric,
понедельник, 18 ноября 2013 г., 12:59:29 UTC+4 пользователь Eric Shulman
написал:
>
> I guess one would hardly need "tabs" with one tab; and, at least in Eric's
>> implementation, nested sliders can't be used one inside another
>>
>
> Yes they can... that's why they are called *nested*
That's also fixed in alpha.15
Best wishes
Jeremy
—
jeremy.rus...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Stephan Hradek
wrote:
> GREAT! Thanks, Jeremy.
> What I additionally noticed: As soon as I click inside such a revealed
> section, it is hidden again. Is this intended?
--
You
GREAT! Thanks, Jeremy.
What I additionally noticed: As soon as I click inside such a revealed
section, it is hidden again. Is this intended?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
Hi Stephan
>
> Of course the "*" don't render as a bulleted list, while o.t.o.h.
> [[advantage]] does link to a tiddler.
>
All that's going on is that the DIV containing the $text$ doesn't have a
newline after the opening tag, and so the content of the DIV is being
parsed in inline mode, which me
>
> I guess one would hardly need "tabs" with one tab; and, at least in Eric's
> implementation, nested sliders can't be used one inside another
>
Yes they can... that's why they are called *nested* sliders!
+++[click this]>
content
+++[second level slider]>
more content
+++[
Hi Jeremy!
I started to use this macro, which I adopted from your example:
\define Comment(text)
<$button class="note" popup="$:/state/Comments">
<$reveal type="nomatch" text="" default="" state="$:/state/Comments"
animate="yes">
$text$
\end
It is called like this:
<>
(example on skeeve.tid
Hi Jeremy,
среда, 3 июля 2013 г., 23:16:39 UTC+4 пользователь Jeremy Ruston написал:
>
> Hi Yakov
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I'm keen to add syntax for some higher level
> constructs like sliders, and have been thinking along similar lines. I
> would like to throw in some related open question
I personally prefer text that can be read without needing to click buttons.
..and.. text "hidden" inside Tabs and Sliders can not be printed. So I'd
like to have something like this
ContentTiddler
! tab one
some text
! tab two
some more text
DisplayTiddler
<>
<>
So ContentTiddler can be nic
Hi Yakov
Thanks for the feedback. I'm keen to add syntax for some higher level
constructs like sliders, and have been thinking along similar lines. I
would like to throw in some related open questions that might be useful to
explore.
First, a bit of background. In TW5, sliders and several other i
Hello all, hi Jeremy,
I've got a small proposal for TiddlyWiki 5. Sorry, I haven't dug much, only
took a look at TW5 at the main site [1] to make sure what I propose is not
the case.
In TiddlyWiki classic, sliders have somewhat bulky syntax, especially when
a slider opens something in the same
12 matches
Mail list logo
