Hi Vincent...
I have posted a reply over at the TiddlyWikiDev group...
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywikidev/vNQi6i9lj-k/hWRi2o2QjUAJ
Cheers, Tobias.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Tobias,
On Thursday, March 7, 2013 3:30:27 AM UTC+8, Tobias Beer wrote:
> Thanks Vincent,
>
> Locally, I can now edit things. Quite a lot of functionality you've put
> in there, looking at all the options.
>
> What I do like...
>
>- being able to click and edit stuff right at the spot
>-
Thanks Vincent,
Locally, I can now edit things. Quite a lot of functionality you've put in
there, looking at all the options.
What I do like...
- being able to click and edit stuff right at the spot
- being able to trigger formatting using __, // and ''
- although you must know that
Tobias,
I agree with you that those flying buttons are annoying. Actually I have
planned to remove them in the near future. Now they are there for debugging
purposes.
I don't know why it doesn't work over the internet, it doesn't work for me
either. It works on my local copy, though. Did you t
Hi Vincent...
You example does not work for me at all, neither in Chrome, nor Firefox,
nor IE. Is that one of these Dropbox issues?
What I see is this CE jumping around all over the place but...
* not where the mouse is
* it's also not clickable
Personally, I woud prefer to not even have this C
I might have figured a way (by accident actually) to mimic the WYSIWYG
behavior. Although still in the primitive stage, you can try it here
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/23745840/pre_release-1.5.1%2B0.7.8.html.
The idea actually came from a careless bug that I recently created, and it
seems to work!
Yes, and it interesting the path that markdown editors are moving...
WysiwyM in fact - with an emphasis on have a rendering available - rather than
editing the rendered version-- and highlight as a typing assist.
Examples would be markdown composer, byword and marked.
U
I also use LyX a lot and
HI Jeremy,
I'd like to 2nd this. Like Yakov, I am also interested in using TiddlyWiki
for scientific notetaking. I think this make a terrific Log Book and
Journal.
In the past, I have really enjoyed using LyX for writing LaTeX. Instead of
taking a straight WYSIWYG approach, LyX takes a WYSIWYM
пятница, 1 марта 2013 г., 18:00:07 UTC+4 пользователь Jeremy Ruston написал:
>
> Hi Rocker
>
> I scrapped the WYSIWYG explorations I did back in the first beta of TW5 in
> 2010 for a number of reasons:
>
> * Marrying WYSIWYG with wikitext is a hard problem to solve, and I felt
> that my efforts w
Hi Rocker
I scrapped the WYSIWYG explorations I did back in the first beta of TW5 in
2010 for a number of reasons:
* Marrying WYSIWYG with wikitext is a hard problem to solve, and I felt
that my efforts were better spent elsewhere (see how long Wikimedia have
spent getting their new visual editor
A couple years ago the tiddlywiki people were working on a fully wysiwyg
tiddlywiki 5. But I saw today from the demo page that there's no wysiwyg at
all. Very disappointed. Anyone know why it's been scrapped?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyW
11 matches
Mail list logo
