[tw5] Re: Is it easy to "port" a library into TW?

On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 7:13:38 AM UTC+2, Tony K wrote: > https://github.com/felixhayashi/TW5-Vis.js is a "conversion" or "port" or > whatever you wanna call it of vis.js to TW > Not a conversion, nor a port. ... Most of the time we only need a small "wrapper" function, that makes a TW

[tw5] Re: Is it easy to "port" a library into TW?

Thanks Joshua for the detailed response https://github.com/felixhayashi/TW5-Vis.js is a "conversion" or "port" or whatever you wanna call it of vis.js to TW I'd like to do the save for pixi.js https://github.com/pixijs On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 8:06:58 AM UTC+3, Joshua Fontany wrote: > >

[tw5] Re: Is it easy to "port" a library into TW?

It honestly depends on the what the library does, and your experience with tiddlywiki and javascript. I was fairly new to javascript, especially on node.js, but had background in other scripting and C#.net. The tiddlywiki architecture, i.e. the raw text -> parse tree -> widget tree -> final