Re: [tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

> > [all[current]] doesn't iterate each tiddler (as all[missing] or > all[orphans] do) That's exactly the kind of inconsistency I'm talking about. Personally I have very low confidence on my memory, and this kind of situation, where 99% of the times things behaves one way and there is an 1%

[tw] Re: [TW5] Introducing my Plugin Library

Ciao Andrew Its nice to see your Plugin Library (even though I had to wear polaroid sunglasses to cope with the 1965 psychedelics). You have made some really neat things! Some of which I was not aware of till now. So, thanks! On a slightly broader point -- Plugin Libraries are good news for e

Re: [tw] Re: Sort tiddlers tittles chronologically

Hi all. On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:32 AM, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki < tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com> wrote: > You're overworking the title field ​Maybe it is an easiest approach to use an introductory tiddler as ​index, linking its references to the corresponding content tiddler. Do you agree? Sor

Re: [tw] Re: Export each tiddler plugin?

Wow Mark! I have other stuff on my plate today but I will soon give that a go! Thank you so much for your help. David Gifford Resonate Global Mission, Mexico City On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:19 PM, 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki < tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > Ok, here we go. If you have you

Re: [tw] Re: Sort tiddlers tittles chronologically

That's an easy way to start. But if you expect to have lots of tiddlers some day, it might be good to think about how to leverage TW5's various tools for listing and editing. When your list becomes large, maintaining all those links by hand will become harder. If you apply a date field, then us

Re: [tw] Re: Is there a way to close a modal together with another button action within the modal?

Hi Jed Thanks a lot. I did try a lot and Could not imagine it was so easy... Yours Jan Jed Carty schrieb am Mi. 28. Juni 2017 um 08:54: > Yes, in the context of the modal you just need to close the tiddler, so > adding this action widget to any button in the modal will do it: > > <$action-sendmes

[tw] Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

The metaphorical matrix of TiddlyWiki has a peculiarity. We spend an awful lot of time re-creating "Mother" in a fitter form. We spend very little time assessing whether Mother's Children succeeded. I would like to think that Our Daughters were doing well, but there seems to be no posts home to

[tw] Re: [TW5] List indirectly-related Tiddlers

Thanks Eric for the pointer. It confused me at first because it didn't work out of the box but it definitely led me down the right path! After adjustments, this is the final code that worked for me: Products: <$list filter="[is[current]tagging[]tag[Products]]"> <$view field="title" /> Awa

Re: [tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

You shouldn't think of the all operator as "iterate over all tiddlers to find the one corresponding to the operand", but as "select all tiddlers corresponding to the operand" (as the name "selector operator" suggests). That the implementation does or does not iterate over every tiddler is a com

Re: [tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

A question from an idiot. WHICH of the options should I USE? I'm really not interested in how we got here, only in what works best, NOW. Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving em

Re: [tw] Re: Performance comparision between [is[current]] and

Based on the discussion, "all[current]" or "" but not "is[current]". Mark On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 10:47:12 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > A question from an idiot. > > WHICH of the options should I USE? I'm really not interested in how we got > here, only in what works best, NOW. >

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Hi, I have absolutely no clue, what you are talking about here!? -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To po

[tw] Re: TiddlySmile ...

*As I look up at the stars, wondering about the beautiful incandescence of Venus I realise I need to put a roof on this TiddlyWiki field toilet.* --* April Mackenzie* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

To take your question literally, you are asking about forks and spinoffs of Tiddlywiki. Are there any that are active? On Jun 28, 2017 15:15, "PMario" wrote: > Hi, > I have absolutely no clue, what you are talking about here!? > -m > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to

[tw] Realistic use cases for Tiddlywiki multiuser

Hello all, I find the idea of having a tiddlywiki hosted online that anyone can edit quite intriguing. But I am wondering what use cases would there be for that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and st

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Lol. I'm obscure, I guess. I kinda mean that we do much work in this group helping get a TW to work (using the baseline of the standard release) ... but we RARELY see the results in completed TWs. I do think its an issue for wider uptake. I don't think most users want to have to create a TW,

Re: [tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Ciao Arlen It could include that. But I was mostly thinking about the contradiction between the "bespokeism" that we, in practice, strongly encourage, contrasted with a paucity of tangible completed TWs to look at. Given ALL the work that is going in daily to help folk solve issues there is NO

[tw] Re: Realistic use cases for Tiddlywiki multiuser

the issue would be about control of the multi-users, I think. Their delegated rights would matter to running something real. I could do with it on a project around the novel Great Expectations where I have multiple participants already. Right now I do it through email. If I could do it directly

[tw] Re: Realistic use cases for Tiddlywiki multiuser

I'd love to have such a feature, but for an ordinary tiddlywiki hosted on a local company file server. This way, the members of a team could collaborate without the need for a hosted service or a web server. The wiki could e. g. be used to write a booklet or manual, to collect information for a

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Hello Josiah, Well, if you're looking for examples of Tiddlywikis. Helped a friend create a couple. They don't quite follow standard TiddlyWiki design, they grew bigger than I initially envisioned. (They also need some updating.) They were meant to be downloaded for reference off-line. They inc

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

They work well on standard widescreens (in portrait not so good as your get bleed form the menu). Its good to see them though! The MAIN point is they do what the user needs. I wish we got to see these everyday. Everyday they are used. Josiah On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 22:29:32 UTC+2, Greg Dav

[tw] Re: Realistic use cases for Tiddlywiki multiuser

Danielo on NoteSelf seems pretty close on this. Partly because he can offload much of the issue to a remote database, leaving the TW only to have to cope with negotiation. I think that is smart & lightweight. Josiah On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 21:36:53 UTC+2, Arlen Beiler wrote: > > Hello all, >

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

I think if you toggle to the menu in the right sidebar, it is useable. At least appears to be when viewed in small portrait screen in Firefox's Redponsive Design Mode. Greg On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 3:42:12 PM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > They work well on standard widescreens (in port

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

rather than bleed it gets cut in portrait. its not a big deal. what ratio is the USER using? That is what matters unless they want folk reading it on mobile phones. On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 22:55:59 UTC+2, Greg Davis wrote: > > I think if you toggle to the menu in the right sidebar, it is

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Thanks Josiah, Intersting, at 320 by 480 and 360 by 640 and 768 by 1024 in "Reponsive Design Mode" it goes into TiddlyWiki's default "mobile mode" with menu over content. At least that happens on my PC. It has been awhile since discussions on designing for mobile (phone) use. I don't remember

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

Ciao Greg Its likely mostly because I use a format most people never do. I have three desktop screens. One always in portrait. Its very good for bringing out the devil you never thought you had :-). Josiah On Wednesday, 28 June 2017 23:23:32 UTC+2, Greg Davis wrote: > > Thanks Josiah, > > Int

[tw] Re: Realistic use cases for Tiddlywiki multiuser

My take on it, in very general terms: 1) Same use cases as with a personal TW but with input from multiple brains. 2) Same uses cases as most other

[tw] TW5 - I have no idea where i went wrong.

I Have a templated form for a gaming group i'm with. and i SWEAR it was working right, but now... The problem: I have a tiddler w/ transcludes a template that has macro calls in it. When i use the macros to save/edit fields on the tiddler, it is SUPPOSED to be saving the data to $:/Data/$(curre

[tw] Re: [TW5] Introducing my Plugin Library

> > Jeremy, Tobias and Jed created Libraries > ...and now @Andrew - very cool!! I would probably attempt(!) to add my name to this exclusive list if it weren't for the fact that plugin libraries, or at least the plugin library handler, needs a serious UX make over. Waaay to obscure given how i

[tw] Re: [TW5] Introducing my Plugin Library

Mat Seriously, you should go Library. And you have a Hooker waiting to do work. Josiah Mat wrote: > > I would probably attempt(!) to add my name to this exclusive list if it > weren't for the fact that plugin libraries ... needs a serious UX make > over. Waaay too obscure > -- You received

Re: [tw] Re: Realistic use cases for Tiddlywiki multiuser

Hi Arlen, A multiuser-Setting would vastly expand the possibilities for using TW in education. For example I would like to have a more automatized was of integrating the result of tasks into TW than the export-email-import I use now. Yours Jan Mat schrieb am Do. 29. Juni 2017 um 00:09: > My take

[tw] Re: TW5 - I have no idea where i went wrong.

On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 4:00:28 PM UTC-7, myst...@gmail.com wrote: > > I Have a templated form for a gaming group i'm with. > and i SWEAR it was working right, but now... > > The problem: > I have a tiddler w/ transcludes a template that has macro calls in it. > What syntax are you using t

[tw] Re: TW5 - I have no idea where i went wrong.

Solution found. What a MASSIVE difference 2 characters makes. My tiddler has '{{}}' Once i changed it to {{|| > I Have a templated form for a gaming group i'm with. > and i SWEAR it was working right, but now... > > The problem: > I have a tiddler w/ transcludes a template that has macro calls in

[tw] Re: TW5 - I have no idea where i went wrong.

Thanks Eric. I was looking at 'Transcluding with Templates' for like the 5th time, and it smacked me in the face. It was indeed the lack of '||' before the template tiddler. Such a small change, so easy to overlook time after time when debugging. On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 6:52:23 PM UTC-5

[tw] Re: Mother begats Mother -- Daughters are spawned anonomously

@TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > > We spend very little time assessing whether Mother's Children succeeded. > I agree with this and it is possibly a huge problem. One problem is that we don't know if it is a huge problem. One problem we *do* know is that we don't have the tools for such assessment. I

[tw] Quick Customize -- Save and restore key settings for multiple devices

This is a tool I came up with awhile ago. I don't use it as much as I hoped simply because TW5 is too slow on my ~5 year old devices. But it might work for others. One of the problems with customizing TW5 is that the entire page might disappear as you erase and type in new numbers for font's, w

[tw] Re: [TW5] Introducing my Plugin Library

Thank you all for your input. I will seriously work on that horrible background. Sorry for the headaches. This is why I love this group. Everyone is willing to pitch in and offer suggestions. Thank you. @Danielo, absolutely, this is open source stuff. I haven't yet got the license stuff in there

[tw] Re: TiddlySmile ...

Please do not make this a multi user version with automatic upload and sharing. Den onsdag den 28. juni 2017 kl. 21.30.16 UTC+2 skrev @TiddlyTweeter: > > *As I look up at the stars, wondering about the beautiful incandescence of > Venus I realise I need to repair the roof on this TiddlyWiki fiel