You shouldn't think of the all operator as "iterate over all tiddlers to find the one corresponding to the operand", but as "select all tiddlers corresponding to the operand" (as the name "selector operator" suggests). That the implementation does or does not iterate over every tiddler is a completely separate fact. Even if "select all current tiddlers" happens to result in only one tiddler, it has helped me to remind the semantic of the operator; first I select, then I filter.
Le mercredi 28 juin 2017 12:21:28 UTC+2, Danielo Rodríguez a écrit : > > [all[current]] doesn't iterate each tiddler (as all[missing] or >> all[orphans] do) > > > That's exactly the kind of inconsistency I'm talking about. Personally I > have very low confidence on my memory, and this kind of situation, where > 99% of the times things behaves one way and there is an 1% that behaves > differently really confuses me. I will always doubt and thing it works the > opposite it does (that is how my brain works, sorry). That's why having > something so clear as <currentTiddler> is important to me. Now that I know > it has the same performance I will always use it. > > Regards > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/21df3cb3-24ed-4f97-809e-b7d82877d77a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
