To assist future visitors
The opposite, has field with any valueis simply [is[current]has[fieldname]]
But an older example given to me was something like this
<>
But I am not so clear on this.
Regards
Tony
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 11:54:01 AM UTC+10, TonyM wrote:
>
> I have answered
Hy Tony,
You know the Fold-bar button? See:
http://tw5custom.tiddlyspot.com/#Folding%20buttons
Cheers,
Ton
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Folks,
As documented here https://tiddlywiki.com/#field%20Operator the "has"
operator does not seem to have a way to filter that returns tiddlers with a
field, that is empty.
We can force it to return fields that are empty along with those that are
not empty,
but to get a list of tiddlers
I have answered my own question;
The filter will be
[has:field[fieldname]]+[!has[fieldname]]
It works on the basis that [has:field[fieldname]] returns all tiddlers with
fieldname blank or otherwise
and that [!has[fieldname]] only returns tiddlers without fieldname having a
value or even
Folks,
On a number of occasions I have panicked because I though I deleted the
content of an important tiddler but it was in fact only folded.
I usually keep the fold/unfold button behind more and would like to have an
indicator that the tiddler is folded visible.
Perhaps even a line like
Mario,
Thanks for reviewing this as far as being a fully integrated solution. I
think its complexity and performance issues you raise indicates this
"integrated case" not be done.
I am confident a solution I have will not have "link rot".
Personally the provision of links and transclusions
Joe,
I am not answering your question but possibly pointing you in another
direction.
TiddlyWiki comes with a set of Table Of Content Macros. TiddlyWiki itsself
is a great source of inspiration for building on top of tiddlywiki.
In fact you can possibly use the toc macro now.
The TOC macros
In part of my $list tree I display a $count of the children of a given
tiddler. Is there a way to hide or not display the <$count> element if it
returns 0?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Joe,
Try using count as a filter operator on a list
<$list filter="[yourfilter]count[]" variable=result>
<>
In the above case result will display the count, but nothing will show if
nothing or 0 items are in the result.
And you could extend this with the emptyMessage (not what you are asking
Thanks Mark! That does indeed work.
I'd also be interested to know if there's a way to take the depth field out
of the equation and use the level parameter instead, since I seem to keep
needing that kind of thing.
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 4:42:57 PM UTC-5, Mark S. wrote:
>
> I don't
It depends on what you're doing, and where the equivalent information of
"depth" is coming from. You might explain more about your set-up.
Instead of reveal, you might be able to use a listwidget
<$list filter="[...stuff I'm looking for
...count[]prefix[$level$]suffix[$level$]]"> WHEE
--
Hi,
There are a number of additional possibilities I have uncovered that could
help you with but if you can provide a bit more of a background it would
help.
One of the easiest methods would be to ensure you have a username always
set, and you can then at the end of the day list all tiddlers
Folks,
A friendly rant.
In any given structure, there tends to be an atomic smallest unit. In
tiddlywiki this is the tiddler. This unit is so practical we tend to operate in
this domain. In databases the minimum unit is a record, and people have to
build larger structures such as client
I should write sometime about how "software" can become more like music
playing. I.e. you have a vast system of "instruments" in play, each of
which has a history, a way of working.
The art is in the mastery, at which level you can construct the new, and
not repeat.
Software is still fairly
Mark S. wrote:
> ... If only I had some information system where to keep these things.
>
Agree. Right now its hard to build broader knowledge of TW because the
fragments stay fragments.
The result is an AWFUL LOT of repetition.
J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
It will also be a short era. Once the AI start writing code, there will be
no need for us coffee-fied wetware interfaces.
So enjoy the music while you may.
-- Mark
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 4:58:01 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> I should write sometime about how "software" can
The irony is if I "Up-Vote" that comment I will fall into its fallout.
On Wednesday, 25 July 2018 16:46:36 UTC+2, Mark S. wrote:
>
> It will also be a short era. Once the AI start writing code, there will be
> no need for us coffee-fied wetware interfaces.
>
> So enjoy the music while you may.
>
This looks very good.
Is there a way to add a caption and subtitle field to multiple existing
tiddlers or do they have to be edited individually.
JMC
On Friday, June 23, 2017 at 9:09:20 AM UTC+1, PMario wrote:
>
> News for https://wikilabs.github.io/editions/uni-link/
>
> V 0.2.0 ... 2017.12.15
I simply want to add an image to a tiddler.
Here is a copy of the code from the tiddlywiki main page that I can't seem
to figure out.
https://www.youtube.com/c/JeremyRuston; class="tc-btn-big-green"
style="background-color:#e52d27;" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
Currently using this filter in a tiddler from Tobias' filter wiki
<>
which seems to keep track of modifications to the wiki, even simple ones
like theme tweaks from the control panel. I'm also using the unique prefix
naming method suggested to things such as custom stylesheets being added to
This is a very short text case for a macro I want to use inside a larger
<$list>, so just using the default/currentTiddler won't work then.
\define test( level:3 base:{{!!title}} )
$level$, $base$
<$reveal type=gteq state="$base$!!depth" text=2>
WHEEE
\end
<>
The intent is to build a list
Those names are confusing, aren't they? The names of various system
tiddlers in TW *LOOK *like file paths, but they're not.
There's no directory /core/images/video. If you type (or copy) the text
$:/core/images/video into a tiddler and preview it, you will see a link to.
If you follow the
The question could be rephrased as "How do I use a Macro Parameter as the a
Reveal State?"
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:50:45 PM UTC-5, Joe Bush wrote:
>
> This is a very short text case for a macro I want to use inside a larger
> <$list>, so just using the default/currentTiddler won't work
Maybe something like:
<>
Which will show all system tiddlers that you have created in the last 100
days (change # of days per your needs). Note that this won't tell you if
you've added someone else's plugin unless that plugin has been modified in
the last 100 days.
-- Mark
On Wednesday,
I don't believe you can use a dynamic default as you are attempting in your
example.
Instead, try:
\define test( level:3 base )
$level$, $base$
<$reveal type=gteq state="$base$!!depth" text=2>
WHEEE
\end
<$macrocall $name="test" level=4 base={{!!title}}/>
-- Mark
On Wednesday, July 25,
25 matches
Mail list logo
