Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

Josiah, How about building on top of SheepyWiki [1] and TweetWeaver [2] TiddlyTweeter can have a column, expanding on his /her Tweets In SheepyWiki I have built on a pre-release and expanded it prioritising cloning as main way. There are various versions SheepyWiki1, SheepyWiki2 ... get the

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

I think the idea of a TIMED FANZINE is really excellent. If you go ahead you can delegate me a topic. J, x AlexHough wrote: > > In the past I have tried to write a fanzine to accompany a new version. > The idea is simple > wrtite the fanzine on a prerelease. report on google groups activity,

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

In the past I have tried to write a fanzine to accompany a new version. The idea is simple wrtite the fanzine on a prerelease. report on google groups activity, twitter activity. Each zine is an edition relating the the version was in pre-release. Once released, a new issue of the zine would

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

Ciao Ste I looked at IFTTT. No interface with Google Groups that I can find. In any case you'd have a problem with the volume. What one needs is a heavily filtered version that concentrates on major, working innovations and stuff that adds to documentation. Most of the stuff written here is

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

I keep meaning to look but is there an IFTTT type solution to auto populate Reddit or something every time there is a post here... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

perhaps the solution is in the "people space" about helping the community develop its shared set of skills with a set of community led purposes in mind. I am a great believer in facilitation, i think it needs to come from outside Alex On 20 November 2017 at 13:33, @TiddlyTweeter

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

Cari tutti, & yeah Alex & Birthe. I am sure you are right that the serendipitous freedom in GG, combined with the nice people here, is a major factor in inertia to keep it. And a good one. AlexHough wrote: > I think we need to be careful about making changes, the unintended > consequence of

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

Do we need a TiddlySkunkWorks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skunkworks_project On 20 November 2017 at 08:13, Alex Hough wrote: > I think we need to be careful about making changes, the unintended > consequence of using google groups is that we get interactions which a

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

I think we need to be careful about making changes, the unintended consequence of using google groups is that we get interactions which a more streamlined system would design out. We may find that the social flavour might change. Alex On Thursday, 16 November 2017, Lost Admin

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

Josiah, I would host for free, or a sponsor add. I have being professionally involved in growing an online community from 2,000 to around 45,000 in enterprise social, yammer I would consider something like Yammer, myself which is both a chat, microblog and long running conversation platform,

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

I T A P P E A R S T H ET E L E G R A P H I S S T I L L W O R K I N G. S T O P. Mark S. wrote: > > Hmm, doesn't look dead: > > https://telegram.org/faq#q-how-is-telegram-different-from-whatsapp > > Dot-org, so hopefully not a company. > > Another interesting FAQ: "Will you have

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

Hmm, doesn't look dead: https://telegram.org/faq#q-how-is-telegram-different-from-whatsapp Dot-org, so hopefully not a company. Another interesting FAQ: "Will you have ads? Or sell my data? Or steal my beloved and enslave my children?" Mark On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 12:28:40 PM

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

Ciao Mark S., PMario & Lost Admin PMario in humour mode wrote ... > I'm on Telegram. So not for me. > Lost Admin wrote: > ... In my humble opinion, to get what TT wants, what this group needs is > proper forums... > Mark S. wrote: > > ... I'm sure we wouldn't want to re-invent every wheel. >

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

If we had a wiki would it be legal to import massive amounts of data from Tiddlywiki.com ? I'm sure we wouldn't want to re-invent every wheel. Mark On Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 6:48:51 AM UTC-8, Lost Admin wrote: > > In my humble opinion, to get what TT wants, what this group needs is >

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

In my humble opinion, to get what TT wants, what this group needs is proper forums instead of Google's attempt to replace nntp. We also probably need a wiki that can be edited by mutliple people. Forums would allow categorization of discussions easier. A wiki with multiple editors would allow

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

Ciao Jeremy Thanks for the reply. I was being more prodding than helpful. FRANKLY, though *GG is looking worse and worse over time*. Our major problem is it CANNOT cope with the sheer complexity of TW as it evolves. Right now is a very good phase in TW's history to know that, to see that

Re: [tw] Would this group be better on WhatsApp?

> > Just a thought. > > This group's Modus Operandi looks somewhat dated. WhatsApp is good for chat but it’s ephemeral: it doesn’t off permalinks or searchability. It might have a role alongside this group, but as a replacement I think it's a non-starter. Best wishes Jeremy. > > Best