After looking at merging the code, I think it best that we wait until
you've finished with the VeNCrypt modifications and add the ability to
specify the remote username. In looking at our existing Java code,
those are actually the only two modifications that have occurred to it
since it was forked
Bug Tracker item #3290864, was opened at 2011-04-21 03:45
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dcommander
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3290864&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of th
Bug Tracker item #3290171, was opened at 2011-04-20 03:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dcommander
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126848&aid=3290171&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of th
New build is up:
http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases
This also fixes the Mac package uninstall issue as well as any other
issues that have been fixed since the official beta.
On 4/29/11 6:22 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
> I've just verified Xvnc based on xserver 1.6.5 works fine.
I had to make a small modification, which was to pass SHA1_LIB=-lcrypto
on the X server configure command line to keep it from trying to link in
all of OpenSSL when doing a static build. Apart from that, it seems to
work fine. I'm spinning a new build right now and will upload it to the
pre-relea
Sorry for late response, this mail got lost in my queue.
You are right that current LogWriter implementation will have problems
with your example. However your patch causes following compilation warnings:
In file included from CConnection.cxx:28:0:
../../common/rfb/LogWriter.h: In member function
I've just verified Xvnc based on xserver 1.6.5 works fine. Note you also
need to bump some modules to fix xserver requirements. Complete patch is
attached on
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3290864&group_id=254363&atid=1126848
Are you able to verify if it is possible to compile xse
On 4/29/11 3:04 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
> Additionally Xvnc built with xorg-build script can contain many bugs
> (yeah, also security bugs) which are already fixed; good example is
> infamous key-repeating bug in our prebuilt Xvnc...
What's the minimum version of the X server required to fix this?
-
Hello Martin,
as DRC stated build-xorg script should be used only on legacy platforms.
It will be big overhead for us to support "one-script-for-all" build.
As a quick hint how to determine what is "legacy" and what isn't, you
can check unix/xserver*.patch files.
When your distro contains xorg s
Hello,
With "identical" I meant that pieces of code which were modified (mostly
unix/vncviewer/* and unix/vncserver{,.man}) are same in 1_1 and trunk -
which means it is safe to commit changes there.
Note about new vncviewer - I think we should commit all patches for
vncviewer in 1_1 also into tr
10 matches
Mail list logo
