On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:39:21 -0400
Brian Hinz wrote:
>
> I don't follow you here. By "normal" do you mean foregoing the advanced
> features of the viewer that depend on the patched fltk and dynamically
> linking against the distribution supplied libfltk.so? Short of replacing
> the system libf
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:10:12 -0500
> DRC wrote:
>
> > The PNG issue is one I've pointed out on the tigervnc-devel list before,
> > but the TigerVNC developers have not accepted my fix for some reason.
> > The patch to fix it is attached
> >
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:10 PM, DRC wrote:
> The PNG issue is one I've pointed out on the tigervnc-devel list before,
> but the TigerVNC developers have not accepted my fix for some reason. The
> patch to fix it is attached (0001-Link-vncviewer-with-**
> libpng-this-avoids-a-build-**error.patch).