Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-users] Build from source

2013-11-04 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:39:21 -0400 Brian Hinz wrote: > > I don't follow you here. By "normal" do you mean foregoing the advanced > features of the viewer that depend on the patched fltk and dynamically > linking against the distribution supplied libfltk.so? Short of replacing > the system libf

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-users] Build from source

2013-10-31 Thread Brian Hinz
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:10:12 -0500 > DRC wrote: > > > The PNG issue is one I've pointed out on the tigervnc-devel list before, > > but the TigerVNC developers have not accepted my fix for some reason. > > The patch to fix it is attached > >

[Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-users] Build from source

2013-10-30 Thread Brian Hinz
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:10 PM, DRC wrote: > The PNG issue is one I've pointed out on the tigervnc-devel list before, > but the TigerVNC developers have not accepted my fix for some reason. The > patch to fix it is attached (0001-Link-vncviewer-with-** > libpng-this-avoids-a-build-**error.patch).