Never mind. Figured out what was wrong and fixed it in CMakeLists.txt.
On 6/10/11 6:48 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:01:03 -0500
> DRC wrote:
>
>> Better. HAVE_FLTK_DEAD_KEYS still fails on both OS X and Linux, but
>> everything else works.
>>
>
> That's a start at least.
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:01:03 -0500
DRC wrote:
> Better. HAVE_FLTK_DEAD_KEYS still fails on both OS X and Linux, but
> everything else works.
>
That's a start at least. Could you send me your CMakeError.log so that
I can see why that test failed?
Rgds
--
Pierre OssmanOpenSource-ba
Better. HAVE_FLTK_DEAD_KEYS still fails on both OS X and Linux, but
everything else works.
On 6/7/11 4:39 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:03:40 -0500
> DRC wrote:
>
>> I am attempting to apply the FLTK patches linked to below, but some of
>> them do not apply cleanly to the l
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:19:18 -0500
DRC wrote:
> IMHO, it would be really convenient if you maintained a set of patches
> within the TigerVNC source tree for now. Obviously these could be
> removed once there is a release of FLTK with them incorporated, but for
> now, I am still confused about wh
IMHO, it would be really convenient if you maintained a set of patches
within the TigerVNC source tree for now. Obviously these could be
removed once there is a release of FLTK with them incorporated, but for
now, I am still confused about which of the patches on FLTK.org I need
to apply. I tried
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:03:40 -0500
DRC wrote:
> I am attempting to apply the FLTK patches linked to below, but some of
> them do not apply cleanly to the latest snapshot:
>
> http://www.fltk.org/strfiles/2599/fltk-1_v4.3.x-keyboard-osx.patch
I might have forgotten to update it. I'll have a look
Actually, there are additional problems as well that seem to be related
to my confusion over which versions of these patches are the right ones
(I have some undefined symbols, etc.) Would really appreciate it if you
could release one unified patch to this list which applies and builds
cleanly agai
I am attempting to apply the FLTK patches linked to below, but some of
them do not apply cleanly to the latest snapshot:
http://www.fltk.org/strfiles/2599/fltk-1_v4.3.x-keyboard-osx.patch
http://www.fltk.org/strfiles/2638/fltk-1.3.x-multimedia.patch
On 5/23/11 6:31 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> The
Hello,
I quickly tested new client and it seems fine for me, basic
functionality works. And it's GUI finally doesn't look like archaeologic
excavation! Good work.
Regards, Adam
On 05/23/2011 01:31 PM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> The new FLTK based client is coming along nicely and now has a rather
>
On Mon, 23 May 2011 22:07:58 +0200
Patrik Pira wrote:
>
> Looks good. Had to add "-lXft -lXinerama" in order for it to link with
> my libfltk (did not apply any of the above mentioned patches).
>
Yeah, I'm not entirely impressed with how CMake handles external
dependencies like this. I'll add
2011-05-23 13:31, Pierre Ossman skrev:
> The new FLTK based client is coming along nicely and now has a rather
> decent feature set. There are still a few regressions compared to the
> old client (biggest one being lack of full screen support), but I'd
> still say it is ready for some testing.
>
>
The new FLTK based client is coming along nicely and now has a rather
decent feature set. There are still a few regressions compared to the
old client (biggest one being lack of full screen support), but I'd
still say it is ready for some testing.
To build the new client you need some things:
- C
12 matches
Mail list logo
