Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Build issues in trunk w/ some fixes suggestions

2013-01-22 Thread Peter Åstrand
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, DRC wrote: If you want, I can see if we can switch our internal FLTK build to CMake instead of Autotools, but I'm not sure what else we can do. Now done. I've also updated BUILDING.txt so that the list of patches is in sync. Rgds, --- Peter Åstrand ThinLinc

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Build issues in trunk w/ some fixes suggestions

2013-01-16 Thread Peter Åstrand
On 1/7/13 4:25 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: (3) CMakeLists.txt in the FLTK build system needs to be patched as follows: Otherwise, it will try to add -lpng to all of the subsequent function checks, which causes them to fail on some machines (including mine.) Have you reported this to the FLTK

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Build issues in trunk w/ some fixes suggestions

2013-01-16 Thread DRC
On 1/16/13 3:12 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: Sure, but we don't have the details. It's not very useful to submit a bug report that says it fails on some machines but not mine :-) Didn't I just supply the details? And a fix? No, because this is a bug introduced by the patches that Cendio made to

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Build issues in trunk w/ some fixes suggestions

2013-01-16 Thread Peter Åstrand
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, DRC wrote: On 1/16/13 3:12 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: Sure, but we don't have the details. It's not very useful to submit a bug report that says it fails on some machines but not mine :-) Didn't I just supply the details? And a fix? Yes, a fix, but I don't understand on

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Build issues in trunk w/ some fixes suggestions

2013-01-16 Thread DRC
On 1/16/13 6:08 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, DRC wrote: On 1/16/13 3:12 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: Sure, but we don't have the details. It's not very useful to submit a bug report that says it fails on some machines but not mine :-) Didn't I just supply the details? And a

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Build issues in trunk w/ some fixes suggestions

2013-01-16 Thread Peter Åstrand
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, DRC wrote: My suggestion is therefore that we start recommending building FLTK with Autotools instead. Ok with everyone? sigh No. Again, goes back to the eat your own dog food thing. If you ever actually tried to build TigerVNC on a real Windows platform, you would

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Build issues in trunk w/ some fixes suggestions

2013-01-16 Thread DRC
On 1/16/13 6:56 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: The two major sponsors of the TigerVNC project are Cendio and Red Hat, and we both are focusing on Linux, so it's quite natural that we favour build systems that works good on Linux. Few if any people have the resources to test things on more than a

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Build issues in trunk w/ some fixes suggestions

2013-01-07 Thread Peter Åstrand
On Sat, 5 Jan 2013, DRC wrote: (1) BUILDING.txt needs to be modified to indicate that fltk-xfixes-xcursor-cmake.2.patch should be applied with patch -p0, not -p1. Fixed. (2) It would be much more convenient if BUILDING.txt contained full links to the patches, rather than links to the

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Build issues in trunk w/ some fixes suggestions

2013-01-07 Thread DRC
On 1/7/13 4:25 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: (3) CMakeLists.txt in the FLTK build system needs to be patched as follows: Otherwise, it will try to add -lpng to all of the subsequent function checks, which causes them to fail on some machines (including mine.) Have you reported this to the FLTK