On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:37:49 -0500
DRC wrote:
> This change makes absolutely no sense. Please understand that this code
> took hundreds of hours to develop and test. Any change to it will
> require significant re-testing. Unless you are willing to do that
> re-testing, please do not touch it w
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:50:13 -0500
DRC wrote:
> If you're referring to doc/rfbtight.odt, then I'm not quite sure how to
> edit it. It appears to be TEX code embedded in an OpenOffice document.
> If we're meant to be maintaining that file, then it probably needs to
> be converted to a proper ODT
On 9/9/11 3:28 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Chill. Saying that people cannot do any changes without first getting
> your seal of approval and/or spending hours of testing even for small
> changes is not a constructive way to encourage development on this
> project.
With respect to the Tight encoder,
