I disagree with this patch. As we discussed and agreed to in the bug
report, we cannot support arbitrary configurations in which a user tries
to set up their own version of FLTK with limited functionality. Either
it has the necessary functionality for TigerVNC or it doesn't.
If this patch is tru
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:28:40 -0600
DRC wrote:
> I disagree with this patch. As we discussed and agreed to in the bug
> report, we cannot support arbitrary configurations in which a user tries
> to set up their own version of FLTK with limited functionality. Either
> it has the necessary functio
On 1/23/12 3:16 PM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>> I disagree with this patch. As we discussed and agreed to in the bug
>> report, we cannot support arbitrary configurations in which a user tries
>> to set up their own version of FLTK with limited functionality. Either
>> it has the necessary functional
