Re: [time-nuts] Looking for KS24019 & WP-9066L10?

Hi, I purchased a pair of L105A & L106A units from you (via Ebay) a month or so ago. I understand you also have the mounting frame (or chassis) for them, are these listed on Ebay?? If the price is right, I might be infested in buying one frame with the interconnecting cables, please specify if t

Re: [time-nuts] Lucent RFTG-m-XO

I had the exact same problem as yours. I discoverd that my 106B had a 6-channel board in it vs. the 8-channel that is supposed to be in there. I put a 8-channel board in and the fault and GPS lights went out. - Original Message - From: "Robert E. Martinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Di

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 31, Issue 21

Christopher Hoover wrote: >> Those who maintain that its OK to use 75 ohm GPS antenna >> cable should read: >> http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/1380.pdf >> > > (I think you pasted the wrong URL.) > > While I provided the quote from the Thunderbolt manual that said, according > to Trimbl

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 31, Issue 21

> Those who maintain that its OK to use 75 ohm GPS antenna > cable should read: > http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/1380.pdf (I think you pasted the wrong URL.) While I provided the quote from the Thunderbolt manual that said, according to Trimble, that 75Z coax is fine, I have Times LMR-4

[time-nuts] RFTG-m-XO experiences

Hi All; I'll give my experiences with my RFTG unit. I bought it ($$$) last fall from an ebay seller who moves a lot of time and frequency related items, it won't take much imagination to figure out who I'm speaking of. I believe he is an honest seller, and I've bought from him several times and

Re: [time-nuts] Lucent RFTG-m-XO

On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:24 PM, Robert E. Martinson wrote: > No, I was running the XO unit all by itself. My guess is that the > XO should > be able to run all by itself??? Perhaps they can, perhaps they can't, but why not prove them in their intended configuration before attempting to use a non-

Re: [time-nuts] Lucent RFTG-m-XO

Thanks for the quick responses, Jim & Phil! No, I was running the XO unit all by itself. My guess is that the XO should be able to run all by itself??? I have previously run with the XO & the RB interconnected (J5 & 10 MHz Ref). Not for 24 hours, but at least over night, but No GPS stayed ON o

[time-nuts] Importance of matching antenna cable for GPS timing receiver

Those who maintain that its OK to use 75 ohm GPS antenna cable should read: http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/1380.pdf Bruce ___ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

Re: [time-nuts] Lucent RFTG-m-XO

On Feb 6, 2007, at 11:27 AM, Robert E. Martinson wrote: > I'm about to conclude that I have a defective unit and will order > another unless anyone has any further suggestions (PLEASE)? Did you have the RB connected via the crossover cable and 10 MHz cable as described in previous emails? Jim

Re: [time-nuts] Re; Lucent RFTG-m-XO

On Feb 6, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Phil Staton wrote: > data on pin 9 (&5) :10020032f3ac52E109cc > starts with a colon > cc seems to be a checksum > the first 2 changes to a 1 if gps ant disconnected and reconnected, > at the same time the no gps led comes on > the zero after the 1st 2 changes to 4

[time-nuts] Digital divider phase noise

For those who would like to improve the phase noise of the output of a digital divider or who would like a good reason to using DDS instead see: http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/1380.pdf Bruce ___ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https

Re: [time-nuts] Getting the most out of your rubidium standard

Christopher Hoover wrote: >> Those who like tinkering with their rubidium standards >> may find the following paper of interest >> > > >> http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/1013.pdf >> > > This is very interesting, indeed, and a very nice practical, follow-on work > from the theor

[time-nuts] Re; Lucent RFTG-m-XO

Finally found my notes (hint: look on both sides of the page!) 24V 410mA RS485 / 1PPS socket (F) pin 1 +ve going 1PPS ~4v pin 6 -ve going 1PPS ~4v pulses ~4mS wide data (same connector) pin 9 and 5 pin 9 and gnd works for serial input to a terminal 9600 8 N 1 my 15MHz was low to start with ~0.51Hz

Re: [time-nuts] Getting the most out of your rubidium standard

> Those who like tinkering with their rubidium standards > may find the following paper of interest > http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/1013.pdf This is very interesting, indeed, and a very nice practical, follow-on work from the theory paper by Audoin et al. It wasn't clear to me how muc

Re: [time-nuts] Lucent RFTG-m-XO

Over the weekend I left the XO unit running for 38 hours, with it installed in its "house" (No probing). The GPS receiver was tracking satellites at the start and also at the end of the run as verified by monitoring J5-2 w/VisualGPS. The Fault & No GPS LEDs never went out. I'm about to conclude

[time-nuts] Getting the most out of your rubidium standard

Those who like tinkering with their rubidium standards may find the following paper of interest http://tf.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/1013.pdf You can potentially drop the Allan deviation of a rubidium package by a factor of ten using the modification detailed in the paper. Bruce __

Re: [time-nuts] 75Z vs 50Z for GPS receivers

From: Brooke Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] 75Z vs 50Z for GPS receivers Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:20:53 -0800 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi Didiere: > > There's also an app note at Linear Technology for making pulses so fast > they are used to calibrate sampling scop