Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Bruce Griffiths
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY Neon John wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:08:11 +1300, Bruce Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > >> The opposite effect is sometimes desirable to force a browser to display >> an image (usually a JPEG) to display on

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544Aand10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Don Collie
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY So, what *is* the input impedance? Cheers,...Don. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 6:30 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] EFC Inp

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread SAIDJACK
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY In a message dated 10/28/2007 21:04:25 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >My more general solution for viewing and printing high res images is to right click >on the image, "copy image" to the clipboard an

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Neon John
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:08:11 +1300, Bruce Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The opposite effect is sometimes desirable to force a browser to display >an image (usually a JPEG) to display on whatever resolution screen is in

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Bruce Griffiths
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY Tom Van Baak wrote: >>> http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/10544/10544-3.gif >>> >>> >> I scanned that as a 3200x1600 high-resolution GIF file. If you >> use modern versions of IE, you have to click on the image to >>

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP10544A and10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread John Miles
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY > The opposite effect is sometimes desirable to force a browser to display > an image (usually a JPEG) to display on whatever resolution screen is in > use. > Any suggestions? Firefox does a pretty reasonable job at that. Whe

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544Aand10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Mike Feher
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY Thanks Tom - I never realized that clicking on the image will magnify it. Now I can see it just fine. - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PR

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Bruce Griffiths
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY Tom Van Baak wrote: >> http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/10544/10544-3.gif >> > > I scanned that as a 3200x1600 high-resolution GIF file. If you > use modern versions of IE, you have to click on the image to > put it back to

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Tom Van Baak
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY > http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/10544/10544-3.gif I scanned that as a 3200x1600 high-resolution GIF file. If you use modern versions of IE, you have to click on the image to put it back to original scale (IE shrinks large im

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Bruce Griffiths
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY Bruce Griffiths wrote: > Mike Feher wrote: > >> While it is difficult to read the resistor values on that schematic (and as >> Bruce points out not really relevant as the diodes are reverse biased), it >> appears that since t

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Bruce Griffiths
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY Mike Feher wrote: > While it is difficult to read the resistor values on that schematic (and as > Bruce points out not really relevant as the diodes are reverse biased), it > appears that since the varicap is referenced to groun

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Mike Feher
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY While it is difficult to read the resistor values on that schematic (and as Bruce points out not really relevant as the diodes are reverse biased), it appears that since the varicap is referenced to ground, the 10544A's EFC is a

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and 10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Bruce Griffiths
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY xaos wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Does anyone know the input resistance of the EFC pin for the > HP 10544A and 10811-6011 OCXO's? > > I have the spec sheet but it is not listed. > > Can I assume something like 50K? This the the

Re: [time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and 10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread Mike Feher
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY According to the schematic in the 10811A manual, the EFC goes to a 100K ohm resistor, then the varicap, and then the other side of the varicap through another 100K ohm resistor to the reference of 6.4 volts. The manual does not

[time-nuts] EFC Input pin impedance for the HP 10544A and 10811-6011

2007-10-28 Thread xaos
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY Hello everyone, Does anyone know the input resistance of the EFC pin for the HP 10544A and 10811-6011 OCXO's? I have the spec sheet but it is not listed. Can I assume something like 50K? This the the value for Crystek device

[time-nuts] Fury GPDSO

2007-10-28 Thread SAIDJACK
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY Hi guys, it's been some time that we sent out the Fury GPSDO PCB's to everyone. Is there anyone out there still waiting for their unit? Has anyone got their unit up-and-running with their OCXO yet? bye, Said