Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread jimlux
Ulrich Bangert wrote: Jim, pardon if I correct you: The reciprocal counters were an intermediate thing between the counting only and the subclock interpolating ones. A reciprocal counter would notice when a frequency measurement would be too imprecise due to an arkward relationship between that

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread Steve
Hi Bob, I took a look at the 10MHz output. The unit had been unpowered on my bench for an hour or so. It took about 10 minutes to stabilize at 1.9Hz on the high side of 10MHz as measured on a GPS-referenced counter. Oscilloscope indicates a level of about +12dBm and a clean looking sine wave.

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I suspect that the unit puts out an ok 10 MHz signal. That would suggest that the +12 and likely the +5 supplies are ok. If the monitor software can talk to it, that's another indication that the +/-12 and +5 are fairly close to working. I think that a problem with the GPS front end / ante

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread Steve
The voltages I measure are 11.8, -12.3 and 4.9VDC. Those measurements are with the unit operating and the power supplies under normal load. There is 4.7VDC on the feed to the antenna, that is with the coax attached to the Thunderbolt. Arthur's suggestion that something is amiss in the RF sect

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread Didier Juges
The TB has an error flag if there is no antenna connected (open) or if it is shorted. The tboltmon PC software reports these flags, and so does my GPSMon firmware in the fluke.l monitor. It is possible but unlikely that there would be something wrong with the bias circuit that would not be repo

Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread John Miles
> Warren, can you please clarify. From what I can see it actually > uses a Minicircuits phase detector, right? That suggests what is > being observed is a phase difference between the DUT and the > REF, not a frequency difference. > > That analog phase measurement is then filtered and amplified >

Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread Tom Van Baak
Where does the "1e-15" figure come from? Is that phase and are the units seconds or radians? Or is that relative frequency at the mixer, if so over what tau does it refer to? I'm curious how you measured or calculated the 1e-15 number. Saying "very nearly zero" doesn't mean much to me. In science

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread Didier Juges
My understanding is that you have the older red box. Manual for the red box is there: http://www.ko4bb.com/Manuals/05%29_GPS_Timing/Trimble/Trimble_-_Thunderbolt/ ThunderBolt_Datasheet_%28red_box%29.pdf The power spec is 24V nominal, 18V min to 36V max Mine has been running off a small open fram

Re: [time-nuts] Reciprocal Counters

2010-06-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Yup, 10 neons in a column for readout of each decade. Lots of mercury vapor triodes in each decade. Even back 40 years ago the triodes weren't all that common. Today .. who knows. Bob On Jun 10, 2010, at 7:32 PM, Leigh L. Klotz, Jr. WA5ZNU wrote: > There will likely be one of these at the

Re: [time-nuts] Reciprocal Counters

2010-06-10 Thread Leigh L. Klotz, Jr. WA5ZNU
There will likely be one of these at the Electronics Flea Market in Cupertino, CA this Saturday. I saw it last month with a $20 price tag, but my guess is that if you can lift it it's yours. it's the one with the stack of neon blubs for each digit. (Somewhere I have one in a garage as well...) L

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread GandalfG8
In a message dated 10/06/2010 20:14:40 GMT Daylight Time, stev...@suddenlink.net writes: Input voltage to the poor performing unit is about 28VDC. I did the tboltmon.exe Factory Reset with no discernible difference in performance. It is the Thunderbolt model in the aluminum housing with

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread Arthur Dent
It may or may not tell you what's wrong but a quick check of the Thunderbolt would be to put a tee in series with the antenna and see if the unit is supplying +5 volts under load to the antenna.You have verified that the antenna works with a second unit so you can rule that out. Where you are

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I would certainly check the solder connections to the RF and power connectors on the PC board. Some of them apparently didn't get a real good solder job when they were new. Bob On Jun 10, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Steve wrote: > Hi all, > > I have used a Trimble Thunderbolt for several years as

Re: [time-nuts] High reverse isolation amplifier

2010-06-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Any idea what the phase noise floor is on them? Bob On Jun 10, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Corby Dawson wrote: > I have purchased a few of the Z1B base kits from Clifton Labs, Jack > Smith and am very impressed by them. > > I am using them as isolation amps in a DMTD unit. > > At 5Mhz the rever

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread Steve
Hi all, I have used a Trimble Thunderbolt for several years as a source for accurate 10MHz signals for counters and signal generators. I have occasionally looked at the Thunderbolt with a laptop and Lady Heather, but have largely treated the Thunderbolt as a plug-and-play-and-forget-about-it

Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread WarrenS
Tom The ADC is measuring the EFC averaged voltage signal. I think all understand that the EFC controls the Frequency of the Ref OSC. This EFC voltage (freq) is what the external S/W uses to convert the two oscillator differences into ADEV. The Phase difference at the phase detector output is h

Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread WarrenS
Ulrich posted: "I know you like my software" an understatment, I love your "PLOTTER" software, without it I could of not, or at least would not, of done much of this. Thanks for you comments. I hope you do not take my poor communication skills and direct ways, wrong or personal. Hopeful we ca

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread d . seiter
Hi Steve, I don't know what the issue is, but my experience was very similar.  My Tbolt is the same (or very similar) to yours and worked fine for a few years off and on.  When Lady Heather became available, I took it out again.  It worked great with the antenna indoors in my lab for about

[time-nuts] Z3815A

2010-06-10 Thread Murray Greenman
Magnus, The Agilent Z3815A is a very nice unit, and fairly easy to get going. The main problem is software, which we had to specially write, although some versions of Ulrich's Z38XX work with it quite well. (The problem is subtle differences in the SCPI syntax). Yes, the backplane carries all th

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread GandalfG8
In a message dated 10/06/2010 23:34:05 GMT Daylight Time, hol...@hotmail.com writes: I'm not sure of the required power spec, but 28V may be too low. These were meant to run off a telco power bus (nominal 48V). I run mine at 40V (from a Tek PS503A mounted in a TM501 mainframe, unit con

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt not seeing satellites

2010-06-10 Thread Mark Sims
I'm not sure of the required power spec,  but 28V may be too low.  These were meant to run off a telco power bus (nominal 48V).   I run mine at 40V (from a Tek PS503A mounted in a TM501 mainframe,  unit connected across the + and - supply terminals,  outputs set to +/- 20V).  It won't run at 2

Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread Tom Van Baak
Fact #1) the TPLL uses Freq not phase, Warren, can you please clarify. From what I can see it actually uses a Minicircuits phase detector, right? That suggests what is being observed is a phase difference between the DUT and the REF, not a frequency difference. That analog phase measurement is

[time-nuts] High reverse isolation amplifier

2010-06-10 Thread Corby Dawson
I have purchased a few of the Z1B base kits from Clifton Labs, Jack Smith and am very impressed by them. I am using them as isolation amps in a DMTD unit. At 5Mhz the reverse isolation is -110db and at 10Mhz it's better than -100. Stringing two in series would be overkill but would give you

Re: [time-nuts] Loran C TOA change

2010-06-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi +/- 300 ns is doing quite well with a 2000C. How far are you from the SOUSTONS station? At least here in the US, they sometimes would do odd things to the slaves on a given chain. Chain masters always *seemed* to less likely to have strange jumps in them. Bob -Original Message- From

[time-nuts] Loran C TOA change

2010-06-10 Thread asmagal
Hello! Thanks to a smart member of this group, I am being able to receive consistently the SOUSTONS X-Ray slave of the European LESSAY (6731) chain with my Austron 2000C. After more than a week of continuous 1PPS phase comparaison between my TBolt and Soustons, with an absolute maximum deviation

Re: [time-nuts] Reciprocal Counters

2010-06-10 Thread Bob Camp
Hi You could always set up a Beckman EPUT meter to do period and get effectively the same sort of result. No solid state in them at all. Full of warm glowing stuff (some of it glowed yellow, some of it glowed purple). Bob -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-n

[time-nuts] Reciprocal Counters

2010-06-10 Thread gsteinba52
Hi Jim, You're showing your age (you young whippersnapper!). ?? "They've been around at least since the 80s,..." Well, my General Radio 1159 Recipromatic Counters are from 1968 - built using those new transistor thingies and with the warm glow of Nixie tube readout. Best, Jerry Message: 2

Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread Ulrich Bangert
Jim, pardon if I correct you: The reciprocal counters were an intermediate thing between the counting only and the subclock interpolating ones. A reciprocal counter would notice when a frequency measurement would be too imprecise due to an arkward relationship between that gate time and the freque

Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread Ulrich Bangert
Steve, I do not want to comment the whole of your posting because I am tired of the discussion myself too. But if I read things like: > The measurement of phase data is > taken over the current period of each waveform and therefore, > assuming the waveform contains noise, each measurement will

Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread jimlux
Ulrich Bangert wrote: The next improvement to the old fashioned pure counter was the invention of subclock interpolation schemes. A counter using this works so: After the beginning of the gate time it waits of the next zero crossing and then measures the time up to the last zero crossing wi

Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread Steve Rooke
Ulrich, May I please tackle some points here please. Regarding Warren's implementation of the TPLL, these points have been covered before, several times, but there is obviously an inability for either Warren or myself to communicate effectively on these matters. On 10 June 2010 22:36, Ulrich Bang

Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread Ulrich Bangert
Warren, I know you like my software and therefore please allow me to put my 50 cts. into the discussion: > The reason that the simple TPLL works so good > but is hard for some "experts" to accept, seems > to come down to the fact that this method uses > Frequency and not Phase to make the raw

[time-nuts] HP Z3815A hookup

2010-06-10 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi! I just got a HP Z3815A but it seems like it is a bit of a challenge to hook it up. I see one large connector for some bus-structure, but don't know the pinning. There is also an 8 coax connector, where I suspect the antenna, 10 MHz, PPS and other generated frequencies pop out. The RS-232

Re: [time-nuts] TPLL secret reveled

2010-06-10 Thread Steve Rooke
Bill, I think I have already shown my position on this whole matter from my previous posts and understand what Warren is alluding to but I'm just trying to assist him make his case in a way that is acceptable to other members on this list. On 10 June 2010 17:35, WB6BNQ wrote: > Steve, > > I have