Use the following adjustment sequence:
1. Set the Cal jumper to Cal Enable
2. Connect the reference to Ext Ref (rear) and Input A
3. Switch the counter to Ext Ref
4. Set the CalByte 50 for the best display (this is a very fine adjustement)
5. Switch the counter to Int Ref
6. Set the CalByte 4 for
I look forward to their demise then. Then Artek can make available what
SRS won't.
Pissing off users is not the way to attract more.
YMMV,
-John
> HI
>
> Simply put - they are so small they have to make money any way they can.
> Their setup is not very efficient. That leads to
HI
Simply put - they are so small they have to make money any way they can. Their
setup is not very efficient. That leads to high costs and trouble on the
balance sheet.
Bob
On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:11 PM, J. Forster wrote:
> Sorry Bob,
>
> That does not wash.
>
> They already have HC manuals
Sorry Bob,
That does not wash.
They already have HC manuals with schematics.
Dave at ArtekMedia is small too. If he can scan a manual and put it
on-line for <$25, so can SRS. And SRS probably already has it as a .pdf.
As the the "trade secret" rubrick, it's nonsense. If some Chinese outfit
want
Hi
SRS is a tiny little outfit making a handful of niche products. I'm amazed they
can make what they do, let alone support any of it. Rather than product lines
they have something here and something else over there. Very hard to train
people on.
That's not to excuse any of this, it just is no
Hi
My offer to take it to the land fill for you still stands.
They are indeed "unique" counters. We have a mix of different brands and
models. It's rare to find anybody who actually prefers the SR620.
Bob
On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:09 PM, saidj...@aol.com wrote:
> Hi Bob, John,
>
> Yeah, gettin
The point is that SRS "customer support is a sham. It might be OK for a
Fortune 100 customer or National Lab, but they clearly do not want or care
about support for anybody else.
If their attitude is "screw you", I believe in returning the favor.
Companies like HP generally make most support docu
Hi Bob, John,
Yeah, getting a "we take $500 no matter if we fix the issue or not"
response is not what I had hoped for..
I don't have the time to learn about and tweak registers myself
unfortunately, but at least there seems to be some hope now that this can be
improved..
bye,
Said
Stanford Research is a rip-off any way you turn. Their support ethic is
just crap.
YMMV,
-John
> Hi guys,
>
> need some help with a cal on my SR-620 counter.
>
> In frequency measurement mode the unit always has an offset of up to
> +/-2E-010 after auto-cal when feeding the sam
of the problem, depending on how far you want to go.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of saidj...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 5:41 PM
To: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: [time-nuts] SR-620 cal
Hi guys,
need s
Hi guys,
need some help with a cal on my SR-620 counter.
In frequency measurement mode the unit always has an offset of up to
+/-2E-010 after auto-cal when feeding the same 10MHz to the (A) input and to
the
external reference. It should not have any offset of course.
Stanford says "the a
11 matches
Mail list logo