Stanford Research is a rip-off any way you turn. Their support ethic is just crap.
YMMV, -John ================ > Hi guys, > > need some help with a cal on my SR-620 counter. > > In frequency measurement mode the unit always has an offset of up to > +/-2E-010 after auto-cal when feeding the same 10MHz to the (A) input and > to the > external reference. It should not have any offset of course. > > Stanford says "the accuracy spec is +/-3.5E-010, so your unit is within > spec". Sigh. that's a crappy spec I should say.. > > Is this normal? On the Agilent counters I get 0.0 perfectly when averaged > when doing that test with the carrier subtracted, no matter what gate > time > I use. > > Any help would be great, as I have to decide if I pay Stanford to do the > cal, and they won't guarantee that the unit will perform any better > whatsoever after spending $500 for the calibration.. > > Thanks, > Said > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
