Try
http://www.symmetricom.com/media/files/downloads/product-datasheets/DS_SA.22
c.pdf
Rob Kimberley
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Dr. David Kirkby
Sent: 23 May 2011 9:20 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and
How about a CSAC? Those pretty much are rubidium clocks, only with cesium
vapor.
-- john, KE5FX
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Rob Kimberley
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 1:32 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and
I see that part of the hyperlink got missed on last message.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Rob Kimberley
Sent: 23 May 2011 9:32 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts]
David,
Besides the Symmetricom SA22c unit which can be found here :
http://www.symmetricom.com/products/frequency-references/rubidium-frequency-standard/SA22c/
There is also the Frequency Electronics Inc. unit FE-5650 which is very much the
same size and can be found here :
Hi there,
I am looking for some advice on stability metrics for a slow oscillator.
The oscillator is used to do a measurement of another quantity which is
connected to the frequency of the Oscillator. I have taken generously
oversampled data of the oscillator voltage and now I have two
On 05/23/11 09:31 AM, Rob Kimberley wrote:
Try
http://www.symmetricom.com/media/files/downloads/product-datasheets/DS_SA.22
c.pdf
Rob Kimberley
Thank you. I don't have know what board area I have available, but I think think
its going to be considerably less than that size. I think the only
I believe thats because RB and CS have cavities that essentially establish
the operating size, because they work at a given frequency. You have to go
to a different technology method to reduce its size, like the new
Symmetricom CS oscillator. Still overall pretty darned amazing in size and
power
I couldn't resist commenting about how top posting annoys you.
Interestingly, I have always top posted ever since my first email way, way
back. Everyone else I dealt with in business did it that way. It wasn't
until I got involved with groups like this, that it apparently became a
problem.
It
Hear, hear, Perrier!
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Perry Sandeen sandee...@yahoo.com wrote:
List,
Wrote: Guys, I gotta ask, what does this have to do with time keeping? Am
I missing something?
Most definitely. In fact, I believe several things. It is the broadening
of one’s mind
On 5/23/11 6:07 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 05/23/11 09:31 AM, Rob Kimberley wrote:
Try
http://www.symmetricom.com/media/files/downloads/product-datasheets/DS_SA.22
c.pdf
Rob Kimberley
Thank you. I don't have know what board area I have available, but I
think think its going to be
On 05/23/11 02:20 PM, paul swed wrote:
I believe thats because RB and CS have cavities that essentially establish
the operating size, because they work at a given frequency.
That makes sense
You have to go
to a different technology method to reduce its size, like the new
Symmetricom CS
Rob,
I agree with you 100%, Top forever.
Had
K7MLR
At 06:29 AM 5/23/2011, you wrote:
I couldn't resist commenting about how top posting annoys you.
Interestingly, I have always top posted ever since my first email way, way
back. Everyone else I dealt with in business did it that way. It
With my old Eudora, I can see top postings and not bottom ones. Unless I hit
the details button and then I have to mine through the headers. Unless the
poster deletes the unwanted posts text below.
At 23-05-2011, you wrote:
I couldn't resist commenting about how top posting annoys you.
For what it is worth, I agree 100%. I have also been top posting for over 30
years.
A lot of times when I open a thread, and, do not see anything but previous
posts, I delete the whole thing. Why should I go all the way to the bottom
to see what someone may have said, or, to even see if there is
I also top post...
Consider the Symmetricom model X72 Rb. I can fit 2 each in my shirt pocket.
Some variants are programmable and spec'd for 12 VDC operation.
I did have problems with one unit that had microphonics when used
with a DEMI/N5AC microwave LO synthesizer in a DEMI 10 GHz
On 05/23/2011 03:07 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 05/23/11 09:31 AM, Rob Kimberley wrote:
Try
http://www.symmetricom.com/media/files/downloads/product-datasheets/DS_SA.22
c.pdf
Rob Kimberley
Thank you. I don't have know what board area I have available, but I
think think its going to be
See
http://orbitrax.com/?p=4468.
I quote from there:
Things looked pretty bleak earlier this month for Lightsquared when
Senator Charles E. Grassley (R) Iowa wrote FCC Chairman requesting the
detailed release of all internal/external communications, including email
between FCC personnel
Just came across this today.
Definitely time-nuts material.
www.b-i-inc.com
3ps resolution
4 millions measurements/sec
Didier KO4BB
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless thingy while I do other things...
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
, version of virus
signature database 6146 (20110523) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
, version of virus
signature database 6146 (20110523) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time
Hi
If you have the power for a rubidium, there are some pretty small OCXO's out
there these days. The little guys will easily beat out a TCXO, but not their
larger OCXO cousins. For small size, indeed a TCXO is going to be your
choice, until it gets to big and you go to an XO.
Bob
David,
You should have said so in the first place. Unless you are sure that the
reference
oscillator is the base for all the generated frequencies, it would not make
sense to
install a Rb source in the radio. You are correct concerning most of the
so-called higher stability options in that
I also prefer top posting. It makes life a lot simpler.
Burt, K6OQK
From: Mike Feher mfe...@eozinc.com
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
time-nuts@febo.com
For what it is worth, I agree 100%. I have also been top posting for over 30
years.
A lot of times
I took a look at these boards at the IFCS/EFTF show a couple of weeks ago,
actually. Nice boards, but at $11,000 each they seem to be aimed at users
who would otherwise be looking for a new Wavecrest-class analyzer.
-- john, KE5FX
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com
To all,
Evidently my link did not work. Curse those bastard WEB site designers with
all modern
embedded garbage. So you will have to go to the main page of Analog Devices at
http://www.analog.com
and select Tools, Software ? Simulation models from the bottom middle of the
page. On
the next
On 05/23/11 06:17 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
On 05/23/2011 03:07 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 05/23/11 09:31 AM, Rob Kimberley wrote:
Try
http://www.symmetricom.com/media/files/downloads/product-datasheets/DS_SA.22
c.pdf
Rob Kimberley
Thank you. I don't have know what board area I have
-Original Message-
From: WB6BNQ wb6...@cox.net
Sent: May 23, 2011 2:17 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] smallest rubidium
David,
You should have said so in the first place. Unless you are sure that the
reference
Sometimes, though, interspersed responses are appropriate. For instance, if
you've got a long analysis or list of things, or a list of questions, then
answering interspersed is more appropriate. (with a note at the top saying
answers interspersed below)
Many mail clients facilitate the
http://designtools.analog.com/dtDDSWeb/dtDDSMain.aspx
That seems to work (don't drop the x on the end ;)
regards,
Fred
From: WB6BNQ wb6...@cox.net
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 11:34
Demian Martin
I was looking it up and ran across this link:
http://www.alstonpatlaw.com/files/FirmService/4871d8f2-6135-465b-8ad2-3829e4
21c91f/Presentation/ceServiceDocument/09-cv-5517%202009-11-20%20Complaint.pd
f
OK, at $11000 apiece, it's better to make your money with lawsuits rather
On 05/23/11 10:44 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
-Original Message-
From: WB6BNQwb6...@cox.net
Sent: May 23, 2011 2:17 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] smallest rubidium
David,
You should have said so in the first place.
At 05:24 PM 5/23/2011, Burt I. Weiner wrote...
I also prefer top posting. It makes life a lot simpler.
Then you should change your MUA so it puts your .sig at the top, too.
Right now, you're both top _and_ bottom posting.
___
time-nuts mailing
On 24 May 2011 11:57, Mike S mi...@flatsurface.com wrote:
At 05:24 PM 5/23/2011, Burt I. Weiner wrote...
I also prefer top posting. It makes life a lot simpler.
Then you should change your MUA so it puts your .sig at the top, too. Right
now, you're both top _and_ bottom posting.
Well
Shalom, Shalom (I simply could not resist, pardon me please)
Shalom Kattan \(BI\)
Mr. Latham,
Your question:
Are these kinda like a high-priced restaurant? If you have to ask the
price
you can't afford it?
:-)
Answer:
The BI200 is $9,800 and the BI220 is $2,950.
What is your
How about a GPSDO in 1 x 1 x 0.5 inch footprint?
Check out the new MtronPTI M9107 and M9107 GPSDOs.
Check out the press release about these on our Jackson Labs Tech website for
more info..
Better than 4E-013 over 100K seconds typically, beats most RBs.
Said
Sent from my iPad
On May 23,
35 matches
Mail list logo
