Re: [time-nuts] Interval Timer Recommendation

2013-01-14 Thread Jonatan Walck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-11 02:48, Bob Camp wrote: HI One thing missing from the list was the HP 53181. It's useless as a timing device and thus didn't get listed. If you are after frequency only, they occasionally show up for quite a bit less than the

[time-nuts] 5120A and PM singal

2013-01-14 Thread Filip Amator
Hello, I made a simple measurement using Symmetricon 5120A phase noise measurement set and a Marconi 2024 signal generator and I don't understand the results. I measured the phase noise of 10 MHz signal with 1 Rad phase modulation at 10 kHz, and I got from mesurement peak at 10 kHz with level

Re: [time-nuts] 5120A and PM singal

2013-01-14 Thread Azelio Boriani
Should the peak level be at 10MHz? Why 10KHz? 10KHz is the delta from the carrier: 10MHz plus or minus 10KHz. Moreover, 1Hz is 2*pi*Rad, 1Rad should be 1Hz/(2*pi). On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Filip Amator filip.ama...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, I made a simple measurement using Symmetricon

Re: [time-nuts] OT - USB to LPT Adapter - Does it exist?

2013-01-14 Thread Nathaniel Bezanson
I always feel guilty replying to off-topic threads, but this one just got interesting! At least most mailers make it easy to mute threads, so... J. L. Trantham wrote: My goal is to connect a BP Micro BP-1600, parallel port connected Universal Programmer, to a computer using USB. BP Micro

[time-nuts] Interval Timer Recommendation

2013-01-14 Thread Arthur Dent
The manual states that loosing the settings on a 6680 is no big problem , but on the 6681 you loose the interpolator calibtation. And it sounds like that's not a good thing. I didn't know you had to watch out for Battery on a PM6680/81. CFO - Tnut-Beginner Denmark The battery in the 6680

Re: [time-nuts] OT - USB to LPT Adapter - Does it exist?

2013-01-14 Thread J. L. Trantham
Nate, I, too, am hesitant to post an OT issue, and that is the reason I tried to ask just the bare essentials without clogging up the list with too much stuff. However, when I want to know something, I like to ask the smartest people I know, and this has certainly proven that point. I think you

Re: [time-nuts] 5120A and PM singal

2013-01-14 Thread John Miles
Remember that any instrument that displays phase noise as ℒ(f) is subject to the small-angle constraint, and that includes the 5120A and other gear in its category. Any amount of PM that shows up at -26 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz is definitely not a small angle effect. See page 40-43 of

Re: [time-nuts] OT - USB to LPT Adapter - Does it exist?

2013-01-14 Thread gary
I stayed out as well. I didn't want to get into this, but I suspect if you are using the parallel port, bit banging is how they did it. That hasn't worked well since win98. Every newer version of Windows made the ports harder to own, mostly because once there was multitasking, it became

[time-nuts] Trimble Thunderbolt E from ePay

2013-01-14 Thread James Tucker
If the buyer of the Thunderbolt-E (item # 221174961917) is a member of TimeNuts, or is know to a TimeNut, please contact me, on- or off-list (as suits one). I'd like to compare notes on operation WRT LH, and observed phenomenon. JimT ___ time-nuts

Re: [time-nuts] 5120A and PM signal

2013-01-14 Thread Grant Hodgson
Filip What exactly are you trying to measure? A phase-modulated carrier will have an infinite number of sidebands spaced at the modulating frequency, the amplitude of the sidebands gradually reducing away from the carrier. The amplitude of the 1st pair of sidebands (closest to the

[time-nuts] Counter OCXO behaviour

2013-01-14 Thread Fabio Eboli
Hello, recently I tried to trim the Racal Dana 1992 04E internal reference, using the GPS pps as a reference. I'd like to ask a pair of questions... - First is about the method. I'm using the counter TI to measure it's own OCXO. The GPS is starting the count, the internal reference 10MHz (on the

Re: [time-nuts] Counter OCXO behaviour

2013-01-14 Thread Ed Breya
Is it manually adjusted right at the oscillator? If so, just opening it up and sticking a screwdriver in there gives it a thermal shock, and the adjusted element will have mechanical stress that has to settle out too - the value can change for a while. Ed

Re: [time-nuts] Counter OCXO behaviour

2013-01-14 Thread David
The Racal Dana 1991/1992 OCXO has a big pair of pan head screws exposed on the back. One is coarse adjust and one is fine adjust. I have the TCXO version which also exposes the adjustment on the back so you do not have to open anything to get to it. You can see them here:

Re: [time-nuts] Counter OCXO behaviour

2013-01-14 Thread David
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:14:23 +0100, Fabio Eboli fabi...@quipo.it wrote: Hello, recently I tried to trim the Racal Dana 1992 04E internal reference, using the GPS pps as a reference. I'd like to ask a pair of questions... - First is about the method. I'm using the counter TI to measure it's own

Re: [time-nuts] 1970's flashback

2013-01-14 Thread paul swed
To the group I really enjoyed the dropbox content. Pretty good pix and can't imagine dragging that stuff around. That said its good that HP did spinoff TM otherwise it would be totally gone. Now look at HP what a mess. Financial mis-engineering. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:03

Re: [time-nuts] Counter OCXO behaviour

2013-01-14 Thread Charles P. Steinmetz
Ed wrote: Is it manually adjusted right at the oscillator? If so, just opening it up and sticking a screwdriver in there gives it a thermal shock, and the adjusted element will have mechanical stress that has to settle out too - the value can change for a while. The 04E standard used in the

Re: [time-nuts] Counter OCXO behaviour

2013-01-14 Thread Fabio Eboli
I answer here to all, thank Ed David and Charles for your thoughts. David, LOL, you posted the pic of the exact counter in question. Not a similar unit, I mean it's exactly *that* 1992 that is being measured ;) The pictures on eevblog show the early measurements I made with the counter. One of

Re: [time-nuts] Counter OCXO behaviour

2013-01-14 Thread Fabio Eboli
Il 2013-01-15 00:08 Fabio Eboli ha scritto: Trying to be more clear: 10MHz period error (vs. GPS) changed from -0.8x10^-10 soon after the trim, to +1x10^-10 after two days (top right). Top right is change of phase in time, i.e. period error measured using GPS as reference. The OCXO period