Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on, but nobody in?

2014-02-19 Thread mike cook

Le 19 févr. 2014 à 01:05, Tom Knox a écrit :

 Thanks Tom and Bob, I have been thinking of contacting Agilent for some time. 
 I think they are a great company with some good products, but there are a few 
 real blind spots in some current products. I also have seen in the past a 
 genuine interest in listening. I would be willing to approach them if I could 
 enlist your help in addressing potential changes to improve the product. 
 Thanks;
 Thomas Knox
 
   
   If they are steering the VCXXO,OCXO from the Ext. Ref. , then they are in 
effect calibrating it. Why not remember the applied EFC when they get phase 
lock?  That can be applied when the internal timebase is selected. 
It couldn't be that they might lose the chance to sell a signal generator ;-), 
as calibration needs a square wave input, and the Ext. Ref In is ignored.

 
 From: li...@rtty.us
 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:00:17 -0500
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on,  
 but nobody in?
 
 Hi
 
 Well at least this got me digging a little. 
 
 If you grab a copy of the 53230A spec sheet and look under the external 
 reference input, it’s pretty well described. It will accept 1, 5,10 MHz as 
 an external reference. It will lock over a 1 ppm range with the XO option 
 and 0.1 ppm with the OCXO option. Based on that I’d guess they are still 
 using the same basic PLL approach as on the older counters (5335 era). 
 
 The “Microsoft Windows inside” sticker on the back of the counter was a bit 
 of a surprise ….

  No sticker on mine. 

 
 Bob
 
 On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Tom Van Baak (lab) t...@leapsecond.com wrote:
 
 TomK,
 
 If anyone has technical contacts deep within Agilent, let's see if this 
 issue can be resolved. I would have bought a 53230A when it came out a few 
 years ago but my eval units showed this clock noise problem. That plus the 
 poor quality of the ref out made me think the designers were cutting 
 corners, or had little experience in metrology, or maybe they thought this 
 was ok for a bench instrument.
 
 Otherwise it's a really nice counter; the first one from Agilent than can 
 actually do ADEV properly (since it is a time stamping counter).
 
 I should dig out my old data and send it to you. Maybe as group we can help 
 them fix the problem.
 
 /tvb
 
 On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:10 AM, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
 I have asked Agilent 
 if stock versions of the 53230A and 53132A switched the internal 
 oscillator out of circuit with an Ext Ref signal 
 applied. I thought 
 Agilent's engineer was intentionally vague but said the oscillators were
 indeed switched out of circuit on the counter with Ext Ref signal applied. 
 These questions were related to several 53132A's I have seen configured 
 with a small board back near the Ext Ref input (OPT H01 I think) that 
 appeared to Switch the internal reference out of circuit. Agilent would 
 not share information on the option. My question to Agilent is why sell an 
 option and be unwilling to say what it does or how your stock unit 
 functions?
 Thomas Knox
 
 
 
 From: t...@leapsecond.com
 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:38:28 -1000
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on,   
  but nobody in?
 
 Bob,
 
 I'm wondering if you (or any else) has measured the PLL performance of 
 the 53230-series?
 
 I agree it will clean up the crud but this assumes the ext ref is 
 dirtier than the internal osc.
 
 What I found instead was that if you use a good external ref the PLL 
 actually makes it worse. This was very disappointing. The XO version of 
 the counter performed worse than the OCXO version even with a maser as 
 the ext reference. Did your reading of the schematic show a way to 
 directly use the ext ref, bypassing the noisy PLL?
 
 The other thing I found was that the ref out signal was a very polluted 
 copy of the ref in.
 
 /tvb (i5s)
 
 On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:04 AM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 If you dig into the schematics (when they supplied them … ):
 
 The external reference goes into a phase detector. It’s one of those 
 digital ones that can lock up to many inputs. You could feed 3. 
 MHz in as a standard input as well as 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 MHz. The 
 internal oscillator (or an internal oscillator) is phase locked to the 
 external input through a fairly narrow analog loop. The idea is to clean 
 up the crud on the standard line. 
 
 With no external reference, the PLL drops out and you go back to what 
 ever the local reference is. 
 
 Yes there’s a little more to it than that and no the circuit is not 
 exactly the same on every counter HP ever made. 
 
 Bob
 
 On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:55 AM, wb6bnq wb6...@cox.net wrote:
 
 Hi Mike,
 
 The most likely answer is when you select external time base for an 
 input, it disables the connection for the internal oscillator.  The 
 external input signal is probably also routed straight 

Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on, but nobody in?

2014-02-19 Thread Said Jackson
Mike,

They are already giving you another way to calibrate the unit, different from 
how you think they should have done it and you are pulling out the statist card 
and accusing them of being greedy capitalists?

Come on, thats backseat driving. Be happy they invested millions of their own 
money and put out a more or less affordable new counter in a market flooded 
with good low-cost used counters.

Bye,
Said

Sent From iPhone

On Feb 19, 2014, at 0:33, mike cook michael.c...@sfr.fr wrote:

 
 Le 19 févr. 2014 à 01:05, Tom Knox a écrit :
 
 Thanks Tom and Bob, I have been thinking of contacting Agilent for some 
 time. I think they are a great company with some good products, but there 
 are a few real blind spots in some current products. I also have seen in the 
 past a genuine interest in listening. I would be willing to approach them if 
 I could enlist your help in addressing potential changes to improve the 
 product. 
 Thanks;
 Thomas Knox
 
   If they are steering the VCXXO,OCXO from the Ext. Ref. , then they are in 
 effect calibrating it. Why not remember the applied EFC when they get phase 
 lock?  That can be applied when the internal timebase is selected. 
 It couldn't be that they might lose the chance to sell a signal generator 
 ;-), as calibration needs a square wave input, and the Ext. Ref In is ignored.
 
 
 From: li...@rtty.us
 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:00:17 -0500
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on,
 but nobody in?
 
 Hi
 
 Well at least this got me digging a little. 
 
 If you grab a copy of the 53230A spec sheet and look under the external 
 reference input, it’s pretty well described. It will accept 1, 5,10 MHz as 
 an external reference. It will lock over a 1 ppm range with the XO option 
 and 0.1 ppm with the OCXO option. Based on that I’d guess they are still 
 using the same basic PLL approach as on the older counters (5335 era). 
 
 The “Microsoft Windows inside” sticker on the back of the counter was a bit 
 of a surprise ….
 
  No sticker on mine. 
 
 
 Bob
 
 On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Tom Van Baak (lab) t...@leapsecond.com 
 wrote:
 
 TomK,
 
 If anyone has technical contacts deep within Agilent, let's see if this 
 issue can be resolved. I would have bought a 53230A when it came out a few 
 years ago but my eval units showed this clock noise problem. That plus the 
 poor quality of the ref out made me think the designers were cutting 
 corners, or had little experience in metrology, or maybe they thought this 
 was ok for a bench instrument.
 
 Otherwise it's a really nice counter; the first one from Agilent than can 
 actually do ADEV properly (since it is a time stamping counter).
 
 I should dig out my old data and send it to you. Maybe as group we can 
 help them fix the problem.
 
 /tvb
 
 On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:10 AM, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
 I have asked Agilent 
 if stock versions of the 53230A and 53132A switched the internal 
 oscillator out of circuit with an Ext Ref signal 
 applied. I thought 
 Agilent's engineer was intentionally vague but said the oscillators were
 indeed switched out of circuit on the counter with Ext Ref signal 
 applied. These questions were related to several 53132A's I have seen 
 configured with a small board back near the Ext Ref input (OPT H01 I 
 think) that appeared to Switch the internal reference out of circuit. 
 Agilent would not share information on the option. My question to Agilent 
 is why sell an option and be unwilling to say what it does or how your 
 stock unit functions?
 Thomas Knox
 
 
 
 From: t...@leapsecond.com
 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:38:28 -1000
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on,  
   but nobody in?
 
 Bob,
 
 I'm wondering if you (or any else) has measured the PLL performance of 
 the 53230-series?
 
 I agree it will clean up the crud but this assumes the ext ref is 
 dirtier than the internal osc.
 
 What I found instead was that if you use a good external ref the PLL 
 actually makes it worse. This was very disappointing. The XO version of 
 the counter performed worse than the OCXO version even with a maser as 
 the ext reference. Did your reading of the schematic show a way to 
 directly use the ext ref, bypassing the noisy PLL?
 
 The other thing I found was that the ref out signal was a very polluted 
 copy of the ref in.
 
 /tvb (i5s)
 
 On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:04 AM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 If you dig into the schematics (when they supplied them … ):
 
 The external reference goes into a phase detector. It’s one of those 
 digital ones that can lock up to many inputs. You could feed 3. 
 MHz in as a standard input as well as 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 MHz. The 
 internal oscillator (or an internal oscillator) is phase locked to the 
 external input through a fairly narrow analog loop. The idea is to 
 clean up the crud on the standard line. 

Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on, but nobody in?

2014-02-19 Thread mike cook
That was a wink, Said, not a howl... 


Le 19 févr. 2014 à 17:25, Said Jackson a écrit :

 Mike,
 
 They are already giving you another way to calibrate the unit, different from 
 how you think they should have done it and you are pulling out the statist 
 card and accusing them of being greedy capitalists?
 
 Come on, thats backseat driving. Be happy they invested millions of their own 
 money and put out a more or less affordable new counter in a market flooded 
 with good low-cost used counters.
 
 Bye,
 Said
 
 Sent From iPhone
 
 On Feb 19, 2014, at 0:33, mike cook michael.c...@sfr.fr wrote:
 
 
 Le 19 févr. 2014 à 01:05, Tom Knox a écrit :
 
 Thanks Tom and Bob, I have been thinking of contacting Agilent for some 
 time. I think they are a great company with some good products, but there 
 are a few real blind spots in some current products. I also have seen in 
 the past a genuine interest in listening. I would be willing to approach 
 them if I could enlist your help in addressing potential changes to improve 
 the product. 
 Thanks;
 Thomas Knox
 
  If they are steering the VCXXO,OCXO from the Ext. Ref. , then they are in 
 effect calibrating it. Why not remember the applied EFC when they get phase 
 lock?  That can be applied when the internal timebase is selected. 
 It couldn't be that they might lose the chance to sell a signal generator 
 ;-), as calibration needs a square wave input, and the Ext. Ref In is 
 ignored.
 
 
 From: li...@rtty.us
 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:00:17 -0500
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on,
 but nobody in?
 
 Hi
 
 Well at least this got me digging a little. 
 
 If you grab a copy of the 53230A spec sheet and look under the external 
 reference input, it’s pretty well described. It will accept 1, 5,10 MHz as 
 an external reference. It will lock over a 1 ppm range with the XO option 
 and 0.1 ppm with the OCXO option. Based on that I’d guess they are still 
 using the same basic PLL approach as on the older counters (5335 era). 
 
 The “Microsoft Windows inside” sticker on the back of the counter was a 
 bit of a surprise ….
 
 No sticker on mine. 
 
 
 Bob
 
 On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Tom Van Baak (lab) t...@leapsecond.com 
 wrote:
 
 TomK,
 
 If anyone has technical contacts deep within Agilent, let's see if this 
 issue can be resolved. I would have bought a 53230A when it came out a 
 few years ago but my eval units showed this clock noise problem. That 
 plus the poor quality of the ref out made me think the designers were 
 cutting corners, or had little experience in metrology, or maybe they 
 thought this was ok for a bench instrument.
 
 Otherwise it's a really nice counter; the first one from Agilent than can 
 actually do ADEV properly (since it is a time stamping counter).
 
 I should dig out my old data and send it to you. Maybe as group we can 
 help them fix the problem.
 
 /tvb
 
 On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:10 AM, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
 I have asked Agilent 
 if stock versions of the 53230A and 53132A switched the internal 
 oscillator out of circuit with an Ext Ref signal 
 applied. I thought 
 Agilent's engineer was intentionally vague but said the oscillators were
 indeed switched out of circuit on the counter with Ext Ref signal 
 applied. These questions were related to several 53132A's I have seen 
 configured with a small board back near the Ext Ref input (OPT H01 I 
 think) that appeared to Switch the internal reference out of circuit. 
 Agilent would not share information on the option. My question to 
 Agilent is why sell an option and be unwilling to say what it does or 
 how your stock unit functions?
 Thomas Knox
 
 
 
 From: t...@leapsecond.com
 Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:38:28 -1000
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on, 
but nobody in?
 
 Bob,
 
 I'm wondering if you (or any else) has measured the PLL performance of 
 the 53230-series?
 
 I agree it will clean up the crud but this assumes the ext ref is 
 dirtier than the internal osc.
 
 What I found instead was that if you use a good external ref the PLL 
 actually makes it worse. This was very disappointing. The XO version of 
 the counter performed worse than the OCXO version even with a maser as 
 the ext reference. Did your reading of the schematic show a way to 
 directly use the ext ref, bypassing the noisy PLL?
 
 The other thing I found was that the ref out signal was a very polluted 
 copy of the ref in.
 
 /tvb (i5s)
 
 On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:04 AM, Bob Camp li...@rtty.us wrote:
 
 Hi
 
 If you dig into the schematics (when they supplied them … ):
 
 The external reference goes into a phase detector. It’s one of those 
 digital ones that can lock up to many inputs. You could feed 
 3. MHz in as a standard input as well as 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, and 
 10 MHz. The internal oscillator (or an internal oscillator) is phase 
 locked to the 

Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on, but nobody in?

2014-02-19 Thread Tom Knox

I hope I have not come off sounding like that Said, I simply would like to see 
a great product better,  I am hoping/committed to work with Agilent toward a 
better product if they are interested. And in the past I have found they are 
interested in our feedback. The 53132A was revolutionary in it's day, but with 
advances in time and freq there is now a market for a 14 or 15 digit counter. 
I am still attempting to individually characterize each item in my time and 
freq system and understand their strengths and weaknesses. And hope to learn 
more about the 53230A in the coming weeks. But TVB's comments in particular 
seemed consistent with my impressions so far.
I would welcome your thoughts on the 53230A.
Thanks;l
Thomas Knox



 CC: time-nuts@febo.com
 From: saidj...@aol.com
 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:25:28 -0800
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on,   
 but nobody in?
 
 Mike,
 
 They are already giving you another way to calibrate the unit, different from 
 how you think they should have done it and you are pulling out the statist 
 card and accusing them of being greedy capitalists?
 
 Come on, thats backseat driving. Be happy they invested millions of their own 
 money and put out a more or less affordable new counter in a market flooded 
 with good low-cost used counters.
 
 Bye,
 Said
 
 Sent From iPhone
 
 On Feb 19, 2014, at 0:33, mike cook michael.c...@sfr.fr wrote:
 
  
  Le 19 févr. 2014 à 01:05, Tom Knox a écrit :
  
  Thanks Tom and Bob, I have been thinking of contacting Agilent for some 
  time. I think they are a great company with some good products, but there 
  are a few real blind spots in some current products. I also have seen in 
  the past a genuine interest in listening. I would be willing to approach 
  them if I could enlist your help in addressing potential changes to 
  improve the product. 
  Thanks;
  Thomas Knox
  
If they are steering the VCXXO,OCXO from the Ext. Ref. , then they are in 
  effect calibrating it. Why not remember the applied EFC when they get phase 
  lock?  That can be applied when the internal timebase is selected. 
  It couldn't be that they might lose the chance to sell a signal generator 
  ;-), as calibration needs a square wave input, and the Ext. Ref In is 
  ignored.
  
  
  From: li...@rtty.us
  Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:00:17 -0500
  To: time-nuts@febo.com
  Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on,   
   but nobody in?
  
  Hi
  
  Well at least this got me digging a little. 
  
  If you grab a copy of the 53230A spec sheet and look under the external 
  reference input, it’s pretty well described. It will accept 1, 5,10 MHz 
  as an external reference. It will lock over a 1 ppm range with the XO 
  option and 0.1 ppm with the OCXO option. Based on that I’d guess they are 
  still using the same basic PLL approach as on the older counters (5335 
  era). 
  
  The “Microsoft Windows inside” sticker on the back of the counter was a 
  bit of a surprise ….
  
   No sticker on mine. 
  
  
  Bob
  
  On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Tom Van Baak (lab) t...@leapsecond.com 
  wrote:
  
  TomK,
  
  If anyone has technical contacts deep within Agilent, let's see if this 
  issue can be resolved. I would have bought a 53230A when it came out a 
  few years ago but my eval units showed this clock noise problem. That 
  plus the poor quality of the ref out made me think the designers were 
  cutting corners, or had little experience in metrology, or maybe they 
  thought this was ok for a bench instrument.
  
  Otherwise it's a really nice counter; the first one from Agilent than 
  can actually do ADEV properly (since it is a time stamping counter).
  
  I should dig out my old data and send it to you. Maybe as group we can 
  help them fix the problem.
  
  /tvb
  
  On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:10 AM, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote:
  
  I have asked Agilent 
  if stock versions of the 53230A and 53132A switched the internal 
  oscillator out of circuit with an Ext Ref signal 
  applied. I thought 
  Agilent's engineer was intentionally vague but said the oscillators were
  indeed switched out of circuit on the counter with Ext Ref signal 
  applied. These questions were related to several 53132A's I have seen 
  configured with a small board back near the Ext Ref input (OPT H01 I 
  think) that appeared to Switch the internal reference out of circuit. 
  Agilent would not share information on the option. My question to 
  Agilent is why sell an option and be unwilling to say what it does or 
  how your stock unit functions?
  Thomas Knox
  
  
  
  From: t...@leapsecond.com
  Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:38:28 -1000
  To: time-nuts@febo.com
  Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light 
  on,but nobody in?
  
  Bob,
  
  I'm wondering if you (or any else) has measured the PLL performance of 
  the 53230-series?
  
  I agree it will 

Re: [time-nuts] TIC model

2014-02-19 Thread Bob Stewart
Hi Bruce,

What are the tradeoffs with using different values for R1?  I have no practical 
experience at this, so all I can do is rely on the models.  Does the fact that 
R2 is in the PIC, and C1 is so tiny, make the value of R1 of less importance?  
On my PIC, they list C1 as 5pf, R2 as effectively about 7K, and C2 120pf.

Bob






 From: Bruce Griffiths bruce.griffi...@xtra.co.nz
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com 
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:35 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] TIC model
 

The attached circuit schematic illustrates how this might be implemented.
Faster logic devices can be substituted.

R2, C2 approximate the equivalent input circuit of the ADC.
R2, C2 values will vary for each ADC.

The Shift register which acts as a synchroniser and produces various trigger 
signals is clocked at 10MHz (assumed to be the uP instruction cycle clock rate)

The RC network charge time varies between 1 and 2 shift register clock periods 
( ie a charge time from 100ns to 200ns).
Sampling a time stamp counter clocked at the same frequency as the shift 
register is only required if the GPSDO local oscillator has a potential 
initial offset of  100ppb or more.
If missing PPS detection is required then a PPS time stamp counter with a 
range of several seconds is desirable.

Bruce


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Valentines Day Love Numbers

2014-02-19 Thread Brooke Clarke

Hi:

In the video about the Full Moon Curse (that's about measuring the distance to each of the 5 retro-reflectors on the 
moon to 1 mm) there's a plot showing the elevation change in the Apache Point Observatory of about 20 inches peak to 
peak.  It's exactly the type of change the effects pendulum clocks.


I asked Tom Murphy if he used GPS to get the elevation plot and the answer is that it came from the gravitymeter with 
the use of Love numbers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_number  - has links to papers on Earth tides
Also see patent 3449956 and GWR instrument link at:
http://www.prc68.com/I/Pendulums.shtml

This means that the concrete piers where many Cesium clocks and GPS reference stations are located are bobbing up and 
down as if they were on a ocean, although only tens of inches.
I think there was an earlier post saying this puts a limit (E-16?) on the ultimate quality of a clock because of it's 
movement.  I wonder if NIST has one of the GWR gravitymeters on a pier and uses that to discipline their fountain clocks 
for the elevation change of the pier or if that's done for the GPS reference antennas?


--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Valentines Day Love Numbers

2014-02-19 Thread Hal Murray

bro...@pacific.net said:
 I wonder if NIST has one of the GWR gravitymeters on a pier and uses that to
 discipline their fountain clocks for the elevation change of the pier or if
 that's done for the GPS reference antennas?

Radio astronomers pay serious attention to earth tides.  For VLBI, they need 
to know where their antennas are located down to a fraction of a wavelength.

An example, from google:

Tidal deformations of the earth from VLBI observations
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134%2FS1063773712050027
 

-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on, but nobody in?

2014-02-19 Thread Said Jackson
Sorry early morning rant,

There are counters out there already that can do 14/15 digits: tsc5125A and the 
Miles box for example. Very difficult to get a reference into that counter that 
can match and provide that type of stability.

I am sure Agilent would love to hear our feedback probably as long as we don't 
accuse them of leaving out features purely as a profit motive.

Heck Apple sells $160 production cost iPads for $800 and doesn't even include a 
calculator app for free. People don't care and they end up with $100+ billion 
cash in the bank. I'd rather have Agilent charge a bit more and have them still 
around 10 years from now.

Bye,
Said 

Sent From iPhone

On Feb 19, 2014, at 10:08, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote:

 
 I hope I have not come off sounding like that Said, I simply would like to 
 see a great product better,  I am hoping/committed to work with Agilent 
 toward a better product if they are interested. And in the past I have found 
 they are interested in our feedback. The 53132A was revolutionary in it's 
 day, but with advances in time and freq there is now a market for a 14 or 15 
 digit counter. 
 I am still attempting to individually characterize each item in my time and 
 freq system and understand their strengths and weaknesses. And hope to learn 
 more about the 53230A in the coming weeks. But TVB's comments in particular 
 seemed consistent with my impressions so far.
 I would welcome your thoughts on the 53230A.
 Thanks;l
 Thomas Knox
 
 
 
 CC: time-nuts@febo.com
 From: saidj...@aol.com
 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:25:28 -0800
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on,
 but nobody in?
 
 Mike,
 
 They are already giving you another way to calibrate the unit, different 
 from how you think they should have done it and you are pulling out the 
 statist card and accusing them of being greedy capitalists?
 
 Come on, thats backseat driving. Be happy they invested millions of their 
 own money and put out a more or less affordable new counter in a market 
 flooded with good low-cost used counters.
 
 Bye,
 Said
 
 Sent From iPhone
 
 On Feb 19, 2014, at 0:33, mike cook michael.c...@sfr.fr wrote:
 
 
 Le 19 févr. 2014 à 01:05, Tom Knox a écrit :
 
 Thanks Tom and Bob, I have been thinking of contacting Agilent for some 
 time. I think they are a great company with some good products, but there 
 are a few real blind spots in some current products. I also have seen in 
 the past a genuine interest in listening. I would be willing to approach 
 them if I could enlist your help in addressing potential changes to 
 improve the product. 
 Thanks;
 Thomas Knox
 
  If they are steering the VCXXO,OCXO from the Ext. Ref. , then they are in 
 effect calibrating it. Why not remember the applied EFC when they get phase 
 lock?  That can be applied when the internal timebase is selected. 
 It couldn't be that they might lose the chance to sell a signal generator 
 ;-), as calibration needs a square wave input, and the Ext. Ref In is 
 ignored.
 
 
 From: li...@rtty.us
 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:00:17 -0500
 To: time-nuts@febo.com
 Subject: Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on,   
  but nobody in?
 
 Hi
 
 Well at least this got me digging a little. 
 
 If you grab a copy of the 53230A spec sheet and look under the external 
 reference input, it’s pretty well described. It will accept 1, 5,10 MHz 
 as an external reference. It will lock over a 1 ppm range with the XO 
 option and 0.1 ppm with the OCXO option. Based on that I’d guess they are 
 still using the same basic PLL approach as on the older counters (5335 
 era). 
 
 The “Microsoft Windows inside” sticker on the back of the counter was a 
 bit of a surprise ….
 
 No sticker on mine. 
 
 
 Bob
 
 On Feb 18, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Tom Van Baak (lab) t...@leapsecond.com 
 wrote:
 
 TomK,
 
 If anyone has technical contacts deep within Agilent, let's see if this 
 issue can be resolved. I would have bought a 53230A when it came out a 
 few years ago but my eval units showed this clock noise problem. That 
 plus the poor quality of the ref out made me think the designers were 
 cutting corners, or had little experience in metrology, or maybe they 
 thought this was ok for a bench instrument.
 
 Otherwise it's a really nice counter; the first one from Agilent than 
 can actually do ADEV properly (since it is a time stamping counter).
 
 I should dig out my old data and send it to you. Maybe as group we can 
 help them fix the problem.
 
 /tvb
 
 On Feb 18, 2014, at 12:10 AM, Tom Knox act...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
 I have asked Agilent 
 if stock versions of the 53230A and 53132A switched the internal 
 oscillator out of circuit with an Ext Ref signal 
 applied. I thought 
 Agilent's engineer was intentionally vague but said the oscillators were
 indeed switched out of circuit on the counter with Ext Ref signal 
 applied. These questions were related to several 

Re: [time-nuts] strange behavior of 53230A or is the light on, but nobody in?

2014-02-19 Thread Magnus Danielson

On 2014-02-19 22:34, Said Jackson wrote:

Sorry early morning rant,

There are counters out there already that can do 14/15 digits: tsc5125A and the 
Miles box for example. Very difficult to get a reference into that counter that 
can match and provide that type of stability.

I am sure Agilent would love to hear our feedback probably as long as we don't 
accuse them of leaving out features purely as a profit motive.

Heck Apple sells $160 production cost iPads for $800 and doesn't even include a 
calculator app for free. People don't care and they end up with $100+ billion 
cash in the bank. I'd rather have Agilent charge a bit more and have them still 
around 10 years from now.


They won't be, not under that name at least. Unfortunatly they ended up 
with another name which will be hard to remember.


Cheers,
Magnus

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] New WWVB modulation format receivers (NOT)

2014-02-19 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist

It may be true that WWVB is sending out a new
format, but the receivers for it don't seem to
exist.  The exclusive rights are held by this
company, which is clearly on hold while it
tries to find a customer who will pay for a
wafer run:

http://eversetclocks.com/

I've seen this sort of thing many times before.
Don't be surprised if this goes the way of
AM stereo, etc.

Does anyone have any positive news about this?

Rick
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


[time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist

Can anyone recommend a atomic wall clock
that displays in digital 24 hour UTC?  Looking for largest
possible digits and LED preferred over LCD, under $100.
Any brands to avoid?

Rick
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New WWVB modulation format receivers (NOT)

2014-02-19 Thread J. Forster
Wouldn't that be nice!

They implement a new format which destroys much of the installed
infrastructure, then don't actually produce the 'better replacement'.

How very LORAN!

-John

==



 It may be true that WWVB is sending out a new
 format, but the receivers for it don't seem to
 exist.  The exclusive rights are held by this
 company, which is clearly on hold while it
 tries to find a customer who will pay for a
 wafer run:

 http://eversetclocks.com/

 I've seen this sort of thing many times before.
 Don't be surprised if this goes the way of
 AM stereo, etc.

 Does anyone have any positive news about this?

 Rick
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Larry McDavid
Most of the atomic WWVB clocks cannot be set to zero time zone offset. 
After considerable looking, I found one that can be set to GMT with DST 
disabled. Look for this one:


Lacrosse Technology
Model WS-8016U

It also has local and RF remote temperature.

I got mine at Fry's Electronics, several years ago.

Larry


On 2/19/2014 3:52 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:

Can anyone recommend a atomic wall clock
that displays in digital 24 hour UTC?  Looking for largest
possible digits and LED preferred over LCD, under $100.
Any brands to avoid?

Rick

...

--
Best wishes,

Larry McDavid W6FUB
Anaheim, California  (SE of Los Angeles, near Disneyland)
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Tim Shoppa
LaCrosse 8055 is one of the few wall clocks I know that allows UTC time
zone to be selected.

BTW, I have a Casio Waveceptor watch (the cheap $30 one) and it works
excellently, always acquiring WWVB signal at midnight to 2 AM here on East
Coast.


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist 
rich...@karlquist.com wrote:

 Can anyone recommend a atomic wall clock
 that displays in digital 24 hour UTC?  Looking for largest
 possible digits and LED preferred over LCD, under $100.
 Any brands to avoid?

 Rick
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
 mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Richard Solomon

I bought the MFJ 121-B. Not LED, but I wasn't looking for that option.

73, Dick, W1KSZ


On 2/19/2014 4:52 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:

Can anyone recommend a atomic wall clock
that displays in digital 24 hour UTC?  Looking for largest
possible digits and LED preferred over LCD, under $100.
Any brands to avoid?

Rick
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Alex Pummer


Radio Shack used to have one, they may still have it,  I have one, it 
works fine it has cca 2 tall numbers for the time, and 0.75 tall for 
the datum and temperature, Fries Electronics is selling one for USD35.-- 
also

73
KJ6UJH
Alex


On 2/19/2014 4:10 PM, Tim Shoppa wrote:

LaCrosse 8055 is one of the few wall clocks I know that allows UTC time
zone to be selected.

BTW, I have a Casio Waveceptor watch (the cheap $30 one) and it works
excellently, always acquiring WWVB signal at midnight to 2 AM here on East
Coast.


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist 
rich...@karlquist.com wrote:


Can anyone recommend a atomic wall clock
that displays in digital 24 hour UTC?  Looking for largest
possible digits and LED preferred over LCD, under $100.
Any brands to avoid?

Rick
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New WWVB modulation format receivers (NOT)

2014-02-19 Thread paul swed
actually they are supposed to have general availability by the end of Q1.
Will see and have no idea about the cost.
Not keeping my fingers crossed at all.
Regards
Paul.


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:18 PM, J. Forster j...@quikus.com wrote:

 Wouldn't that be nice!

 They implement a new format which destroys much of the installed
 infrastructure, then don't actually produce the 'better replacement'.

 How very LORAN!

 -John

 ==



  It may be true that WWVB is sending out a new
  format, but the receivers for it don't seem to
  exist.  The exclusive rights are held by this
  company, which is clearly on hold while it
  tries to find a customer who will pay for a
  wafer run:
 
  http://eversetclocks.com/
 
  I've seen this sort of thing many times before.
  Don't be surprised if this goes the way of
  AM stereo, etc.
 
  Does anyone have any positive news about this?
 
  Rick
  ___
  time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
  To unsubscribe, go to
  https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
  and follow the instructions there.
 
 


 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to
 https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist

Thanks for the suggestions, but the MFJ121 does not
display the date and the Lacrosse 8055 and 8016
do not display seconds.  I need hour minutes seconds
day and date.  You wouldn't think that would be
so hard.  It looks like my only choice is this
smallish wall clock (more like a desk clock):

LaCrosse WS-8005U-W

The seconds are in rather small type.
I also do not need temperature, but I'm
stuck with it apparently.

All the really large clocks I have seen do not do GMT.
You know this right away when they have a time zone
map on the display.


Rick
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Robert Watzlavick
Definitely avoid BRG clocks.  They are reasonably priced and look really 
nice on the outside but look like a high school science project inside.  
Plus, with both versions I purchased (while at 2 different companies), 
the IRIG-B option just didn't work reliably.  It worked some of the 
time, just enough to make you think it was working.  Finally, the menu 
system is confusing at best.  Just say no...


-Bob

On 02/19/2014 05:52 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:

Can anyone recommend a atomic wall clock
that displays in digital 24 hour UTC?  Looking for largest
possible digits and LED preferred over LCD, under $100.
Any brands to avoid?

Rick
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.




___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Michael Perrett
I recently bought a La Crosse, See at ebay item 360752857574, that quickly
synced up to WWVB and, at least to my ability to mark a time tick, been
within the second of WWV. Total cost was $43.
Michael / K7HIL


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist 
rich...@karlquist.com wrote:

 Can anyone recommend a atomic wall clock
 that displays in digital 24 hour UTC?  Looking for largest
 possible digits and LED preferred over LCD, under $100.
 Any brands to avoid?

 Rick
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
 mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.

___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Chris Albertson
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist 
rich...@karlquist.com wrote:

 Can anyone recommend a atomic wall clock
 that displays in digital 24 hour UTC?


Any reason why it was to by WWVB?  What if it used some other means of
saying accurate?   The larger professional quality clocks generally don't
use WWVB.  If you can relax your requirements more options are open.

Someone asked for this a while back and I think the simplest solution was
to use a cell phone app.  You can buy a way-cheap android tablet, even a
used one and run a clock app on it.  Some of them even simulate the red
LEDs you are looking for.   It will remain accurate to better than your
eyes can detect.


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist



On 2/19/2014 6:35 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist 
rich...@karlquist.com wrote:


Can anyone recommend a atomic wall clock
that displays in digital 24 hour UTC?



Any reason why it was to by WWVB?  What if it used some other means of
saying accurate?   The larger professional quality clocks generally don't


Non technical reason.

I want to use WWVB because I want to be able to
mention to visitors that the clock links to an ensemble
of 5071A cesium standards, and I was one of the designers
of the 5071A, the actual atomic clock.  I do also
want to use the clock for my ham station.

Rick
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Valentines Day Love Numbers

2014-02-19 Thread Tom Van Baak (lab)
Brooke,

See old posting: 
http://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2011-January/053478.html

The effect is too small (~5e-17 over 6 hours) to affect GPS time transfer. 

/tvb

 On Feb 19, 2014, at 8:24 AM, Brooke Clarke bro...@pacific.net wrote:
 
 Hi:
 
 In the video about the Full Moon Curse (that's about measuring the distance 
 to each of the 5 retro-reflectors on the moon to 1 mm) there's a plot showing 
 the elevation change in the Apache Point Observatory of about 20 inches peak 
 to peak.  It's exactly the type of change the effects pendulum clocks.
 
 I asked Tom Murphy if he used GPS to get the elevation plot and the answer is 
 that it came from the gravitymeter with the use of Love numbers.
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_number  - has links to papers on Earth 
 tides
 Also see patent 3449956 and GWR instrument link at:
 http://www.prc68.com/I/Pendulums.shtml
 
 This means that the concrete piers where many Cesium clocks and GPS reference 
 stations are located are bobbing up and down as if they were on a ocean, 
 although only tens of inches.
 I think there was an earlier post saying this puts a limit (E-16?) on the 
 ultimate quality of a clock because of it's movement.  I wonder if NIST has 
 one of the GWR gravitymeters on a pier and uses that to discipline their 
 fountain clocks for the elevation change of the pier or if that's done for 
 the GPS reference antennas?
 
 -- 
 Have Fun,
 
 Brooke Clarke
 http://www.PRC68.com
 http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
 
 ___
 time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
 To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
 and follow the instructions there.
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist

CORRECTION:

The 8005 series (with indoor temperature) does not support GMT

Only the 8115 and 8119 series (with indoor and outdoor
temperature) support GMT.

On 2/19/2014 5:47 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:


so hard.  It looks like my only choice is this
smallish wall clock (more like a desk clock):

LaCrosse WS-8005U-W


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Valentines Day Love Numbers

2014-02-19 Thread Jim Lux

On 2/19/14 10:24 AM, Brooke Clarke wrote:

Hi:




This means that the concrete piers where many Cesium clocks and GPS
reference stations are located are bobbing up and down as if they were
on a ocean, although only tens of inches.


My GPS friends comment when you start getting to sub-meter precision for 
non-differential measurements, there's a whole lot of effects that start 
getting in the way. ionosphere, multipath, solid earth tides, etc. 
They're all in the centimeters but not meters bucket.




I think there was an earlier post saying this puts a limit (E-16?) on
the ultimate quality of a clock because of it's movement.  I wonder if
NIST has one of the GWR gravitymeters on a pier and uses that to
discipline their fountain clocks for the elevation change of the pier or
if that's done for the GPS reference antennas?



___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] Looking for WWVB digital wall clock with digital 24 hour UTC display

2014-02-19 Thread Andy
Rick wrote:

  Thanks for the suggestions, but the MFJ121 does not
   display the date

The MFJ-121 might not include the date, but some of their other large WWVB
clocks do.  Go to
http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Categories.php?sec=226(clock products)
and click on the ones that say ATOMIC.  I am not sure if
they all can be set to UTC but some of them say they can.  MFJ products are
made for radio amateurs, many of whom use UTC for 'talking around the
world'.

Be aware that MFJ has mixed reviews ... some of their products that they
themselves assemble in Mississippi can have QC issues.  Cold solder joints
is the one I hear most often.  Some people love 'em; others hate 'em.  They
are a successful business for 40+ years so I'd have to guess the lovers
outweigh the haters.

Andy
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New WWVB modulation format receivers (NOT)

2014-02-19 Thread John Marvin
I guess my question is who has the right to grant exclusive rights for 
the ability to decode a very simple protocol? Was a patent actually 
granted for this?


John

On 2/19/2014 4:49 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:

It may be true that WWVB is sending out a new
format, but the receivers for it don't seem to
exist.  The exclusive rights are held by this
company, which is clearly on hold while it
tries to find a customer who will pay for a
wafer run:

http://eversetclocks.com/

I've seen this sort of thing many times before.
Don't be surprised if this goes the way of
AM stereo, etc.

Does anyone have any positive news about this?

Rick
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to 
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

and follow the instructions there.


___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


Re: [time-nuts] New WWVB modulation format receivers (NOT)

2014-02-19 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist



On 2/19/2014 9:10 PM, John Marvin wrote:

I guess my question is who has the right to grant exclusive rights for
the ability to decode a very simple protocol? Was a patent actually
granted for this?

John



They have exclusive rights to the IP core for their IC.
I guess someone else could design their own IC...

Rick
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.